Health Journal Online

Category: Diseases & Conditions

  • How to Protect Your Health in the First 24 Hours After a Car Accident

    How to Protect Your Health in the First 24 Hours After a Car Accident

    The jarring reality of a vehicle collision is a frequent and tragic event across the United States. In fact, car accidents are responsible for an estimated 100 deaths each day and send 2.1 million people to the emergency room annually. In the moments following a crash, chaos, confusion, and a rush of adrenaline can easily take over, often masking the presence of serious injuries.

    Navigating this high-stress situation with a clear plan is essential for your long-term well-being. This guide provides clear, actionable steps to take within the first 24 hours to protect your most important asset: your health. By acting deliberately, you can prevent minor issues from becoming major complications and ensure you are on the right path to a full recovery.

    At the Scene: Your First Priority Actions

    What you do immediately at the crash site can have a significant impact on your health and safety. The priority is to secure the area, assess your physical condition, and gather essential information without putting yourself or others at further risk.

    Ensure Safety and Call for Help

    Your first action should always be to assess immediate danger. If it is possible and safe to do so, move your vehicle to the shoulder or out of the flow of traffic to prevent a secondary collision. Turn on your hazard lights to alert other drivers.

    Next, call 911 without delay, even if the accident seems minor. This summons both medical first responders who can provide immediate aid and law enforcement to secure the scene. A formal police report provides essential documentation of the accident, which is often required by insurance companies to process a claim.

    Perform a Quick Self-Check

    While waiting for help to arrive, conduct a brief self-assessment for any obvious injuries. Check for cuts, active bleeding, signs of head trauma, or potential broken bones. Pay attention to any sharp pain or inability to move a limb.

    It is critical to advise against moving if you suspect a neck or back injury, as this could worsen a potential spinal cord issue. If you are in pain or feel dizzy, try to remain still and wait for paramedics to assist you safely.

    A Step-by-Step Checklist for the Scene

    While waiting for first responders, there are several key steps you can take to document the incident, provided you are not seriously injured and can move safely.

    • Check on other passengers and individuals involved in the accident. Ask if they are okay, but avoid administering medical aid unless you are qualified; wait for professionals.
    • Use your phone to take photos of the scene from multiple angles. Document the damage to all vehicles involved, skid marks on the road, traffic signals, and any of your own visible injuries.
    • Exchange contact and insurance information with the other driver(s). Get their full name, phone number, address, driver’s license number, license plate number, and insurance policy details.
    • Avoid discussing fault or apologizing. Statements like “I’m so sorry” can be misinterpreted as an admission of guilt, which can complicate insurance and legal matters later.
    • If there are witnesses, get their names and phone numbers. Their impartial accounts of what happened can be invaluable for both medical and insurance purposes.
    • Cooperate with the police when they arrive. Provide a clear, factual account of the events leading up to the collision. Stick to what you know and avoid speculating.

    The Critical Hours After: Recognizing Hidden Dangers

    The 24-hour period after a car accident is a critical window for identifying injuries that may not be immediately apparent. Adrenaline can mask significant pain, and some of the most common collision-related injuries have delayed symptoms. Seeking prompt medical attention is non-negotiable.

    Why You Must See a Doctor, Even if You Feel Fine

    The surge of adrenaline during a car crash is a powerful painkiller. Many people walk away from an accident feeling fine, only to wake up in severe pain the next day. A medical professional can identify underlying issues like internal bruising, hairline fractures, or soft tissue damage that you may not feel yet. Getting immediate medical help can be life-saving.

    Furthermore, many serious conditions, such as cervical spine dysfunction, only become apparent after a professional evaluation. A thorough medical check-up creates a baseline record of your health post-accident, which is vital for proper follow-up care.

    Common Delayed-Symptom Injuries

    Some of the most serious injuries may not show symptoms for hours or even days. According to legal and medical experts, whiplash is a prime example of an injury that may not present symptoms until well after the collision. What initially feels like minor neck stiffness can develop into chronic pain and limited mobility if left untreated.

    Other common delayed-symptom injuries include concussions, which can manifest as headaches or confusion hours later; soft tissue injuries like sprains and strains; and even dangerous internal bleeding. Never dismiss minor aches or stiffness in the day following an accident, as they could be early indicators of a more significant musculoskeletal problem.

    Symptoms to Watch For: Immediate vs. Delayed

    Being vigilant about your body’s signals is crucial. Here is a comparison of symptoms that may appear immediately versus those that can surface hours or days later.

    Immediate Symptoms to Address Delayed Symptoms (Hours to Days Later)
    Visible cuts or bleeding Persistent headaches, dizziness, or confusion (Concussion)
    Suspected broken bones or fractures Neck, shoulder, or back stiffness and pain (Whiplash)
    Loss of consciousness, however brief Numbness, tingling, or weakness in limbs (Nerve damage)
    Difficulty breathing or chest pain Abdominal pain, deep bruising, or swelling (Internal injury)
    Obvious pain and discomfort Emotional changes like anxiety, irritability, or PTSD

    Safeguarding Your Recovery: The Power of Documentation

    Meticulous record-keeping is a powerful tool for managing your health after an accident. It helps your medical team track your progress and provides a clear, detailed history for any subsequent insurance or legal processes that may arise.

    Creating a Detailed Health Journal

    From the very first day, start a journal to document your health journey. Record every physical and mental symptom you experience, no matter how minor it seems. Note your pain levels on a scale of 1 to 10 throughout the day.

    Also, keep track of any medication you take, disruptions to your sleep patterns, and any daily activities you now find difficult or impossible to perform. This detailed log will be an invaluable resource for your doctor and can help illustrate the full impact of the accident on your quality of life.

    The Legal Importance of Prompt Medical Records

    From a legal and insurance standpoint, seeking an immediate medical evaluation creates an official record that links your injuries directly to the accident. This documentation is crucial for validating insurance claims and protecting your rights in a potential personal injury case. Insurance companies may argue that a delay in seeking care means your injuries were caused by another event, not the collision.

    Understanding the immediate steps to take after a car accident includes recognizing how proper medical and legal documentation safeguards your future. This is particularly important because the gap between a legal settlement and a person’s actual physical recovery can be significant if not managed correctly from the start.

    Don’t Forget Your Mental Health

    The impact of a car accident is not just physical; it is a traumatic event that can have a lasting psychological effect. It is common to experience anxiety, depression, or even post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the weeks and months following a crash.

    If you experience persistent emotional distress, flashbacks of the event, nightmares, or a new fear related to driving, it is important to speak with a mental health professional. Acknowledging and addressing the mental health impact is a critical component of a comprehensive recovery.

    Taking Control of Your Recovery Starts Now

    In the aftermath of a car accident, focusing on three critical actions can define your path forward: ensuring your safety at the scene, seeking a comprehensive medical evaluation without delay, and meticulously documenting every aspect of your physical and mental health journey. These steps are your first line of defense against long-term complications.

    While you couldn’t control the accident, you can take control of your recovery. By prioritizing your health from the very first day, you empower yourself to heal properly and build the strongest possible foundation for your future well-being.

    Source link

  • The Importance of Acadia Healthcare’s Partnerships With Healthcare Organizations

    The Importance of Acadia Healthcare’s Partnerships With Healthcare Organizations

    Although approximately 60 million Americans are experiencing behavioral health issues, the gap between need for behavioral health services and available treatment remains substantial.

    To address this treatment gap, Acadia Healthcare has developed a collaborative model built on partnerships with established healthcare systems across the country. These partnerships aim to expand access to specialized behavioral healthcare while maintaining clinical quality standards.

    Joint Venture Model

    Acadia Healthcare maintains equity partnerships with 21 healthcare systems that operate 22 behavioral health hospitals nationwide.

    Recent examples of Acadia’s affiliated network include partnerships with Intermountain Health in Westminster, Colorado, and Henry Ford Health in West Bloomfield, Michigan. The Intermountain Health partnership created West Pines Behavioral Health, a 144-bed facility, while the Henry Ford Health joint venture established a 192-bed hospital that became operational in early 2025. During the first quarter of 2025 alone, Acadia’s affiliated network added 378 new beds through both joint ventures and expansion of existing facilities.

    Acadia’s affiliated network now includes 260 facilities nationwide and added seven new comprehensive treatment centers during the first quarter of 2025, extending the company’s market reach to 170 locations across over 30 states. Additional recent openings include a de novo facility in Northport, Florida, which began operations in the first quarter of 2025.

    These joint ventures can help medical health systems meet population needs that their existing infrastructure often cannot address. For patients needing specialized mental health treatment, such as children and adolescents with complex conditions, the partnerships can create dedicated spaces that free capacity for medical patients in general hospitals.

    Breaking Barriers to Behavioral Care

    The National Council for Mental Wellbeing has highlighted significant barriers to behavioral health treatment. In a recent survey, they found that people who need mental health and substance use treatment face numerous obstacles, with cost-related issues, inability to find conveniently located providers, and difficulty getting immediate appointments cited as primary barriers.

    A study by the American Psychological Association found that 90% of the public believes there is a mental health crisis in the United States today. When Americans who felt they needed mental health services were asked about specific barriers to accessing care, 80% cited cost and more than 60% cited shame and stigma as the main obstacles. At the same time, 60% of psychologists surveyed reported no openings for patients.

    The partnership model that Acadia Healthcare has developed is aimed at addressing these structural barriers through collaborative approaches. Through combining the specialized behavioral health expertise of Acadia Healthcare with the established community presence and broader healthcare capabilities of its network affiliates, these partnerships can create more integrated care pathways.

    A 2024 American Health Law Association review of behavioral health mergers and acquisitions found that joint venture partnerships have become increasingly important in the mental health sector because they help traditional nonprofit health systems operate more efficiently while meeting the high demand for behavioral health services.

    The clinical advantages of these partnerships extend beyond increasing access. A study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine found that integrating behavioral health providers into broader healthcare teams “can enhance provider responsiveness to patients with complex clinical presentations and improve patient/family outcomes and satisfaction.” This integration can create opportunities for interdisciplinary cross-training, with behavioral health specialists sharing knowledge with primary care colleagues about early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of mental health concerns.

    This knowledge sharing can improve treatment approaches for patients with complex needs who might otherwise cycle through emergency departments without receiving appropriate mental healthcare.

    Serving Areas in Need

    According to a 2022 report from ABC News analyzing Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data, “75% of rural counties across the country have no mental health providers or fewer than 50 per 100,000 people” and there are “570 counties in the United States [that] have no providers”.”

    The Research and Action Institute found that “among nonmetropolitan counties, 65% had no practicing psychiatrist as compared with 27% of metropolitan counties.”

    Acadia Healthcare’s joint venture with East Carolina University to build a 144-bed behavioral health hospital in Greenville, North Carolina exemplifies how these partnerships can address regional gaps in care. North Carolina, like many states with large rural populations, has struggled with behavioral health access issues. North Carolina ranked 34th out of all states for adults with a mental illness who did not receive treatment (56.5%), according to Mental Health America.

    By collaborating with an established healthcare system that already serves the community, Acadia’s affiliated network can introduce specialized behavioral healthcare and increase the availability of care options.

    Technology integration is another significant benefit of these partnerships. While behavioral healthcare has historically lagged in technology adoption compared to other medical specialties, joint ventures can enable faster implementation of electronic medical records and other digital health tools.

    As Acadia’s Chief Medical Officer Dr. Stephanie Eken and Chief Quality Officer Dr. Navdeep Kang noted in a recent article, “The explicit exclusion of behavioral health facilities from the HITECH Act prevented incentives to adopt electronic medical records… and other technology advancements at inpatient psychiatric facilities.”

    But through partnerships with hospital systems that already have advanced EMR capabilities, Acadia Healthcare and its network of affiliates can accelerate technology adoption in behavioral health settings. This can improve clinical documentation and care coordination and can enable better measurement of outcomes — a critical factor in demonstrating the value of behavioral health interventions to payers and policy makers.

    Broader Impacts

    The impact of these partnerships extends beyond the participating organizations to benefit entire healthcare systems. Untreated mental health and substance use disorders can have significant downstream impacts on the healthcare system through increased emergency department utilization, higher rates of medical complications, and reduced workplace productivity. According to a 2019 Rand Corporation study evaluating the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration program, integrated care approaches that combine physical and behavioral healthcare can reduce total healthcare costs by 5% to 10% through earlier intervention and more appropriate treatment matching.

    Acadia’s network partnership model can help address workforce challenges plaguing behavioral healthcare. With shortages of psychiatrists, psychologists, and other mental health professionals nationwide, Acadia’s joint ventures with healthcare systems can create more attractive practice environments that can help with recruitment and retention of specialized staff. These collaborative arrangements can enable shared staffing models, training opportunities, and career advancement pathways that might not be feasible in standalone facilities.

    From a public health perspective, these partnerships can assist in normalizing mental healthcare as a fundamental component of overall health. By physically locating behavioral health facilities on or near general hospital campuses and integrating clinical protocols, these joint ventures can reduce stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment. This proximity can send a message that mental healthcare deserves the same attention and resources as other medical specialties.

    Source link

  • Medicine Nobel To Trio Who Identified Immune System’s ‘Security Guards’

    Medicine Nobel To Trio Who Identified Immune System’s ‘Security Guards’

    A US-Japanese trio on Monday won the Nobel Prize in Medicine for research into how the immune system is kept in check by identifying its “security guards”, the Nobel jury said.

    The discoveries by Mary E. Brunkow and Fred Ramsdell of the United States and Japan’s Shimon Sakaguchi have been decisive for understanding how the immune system functions and why we do not all develop serious autoimmune diseases.

    Sakaguchi, a professor at the Immunology Frontier Research Centre in Osaka, told Swedish broadcaster Sveriges Radio: “It’s an honour for me. I’m looking forward to visiting Stockholm in December” to receive the award in person.

    The Nobel committee was however unable to reach the two US-based laureates to break the news to them in person.

    “If you hear this, call me,” the head of the Nobel Assembly, Thomas Perlmann, joked at the press conference announcing the winners.

    The three won the prize for research that identified the immune system’s “security guards”, called regulatory T-cells.

    Their work concerns “peripheral immune tolerance” that prevents the immune system from harming the body, and has led to a new field of research and the development of potential medical treatments now being evaluated in clinical trials.

    “The hope is to be able to treat or cure autoimmune diseases, provide more effective cancer treatments and prevent serious complications after stem cell transplants,” the jury said.

    Sakaguchi made the first key discovery in 1995.

    At the time, many researchers were convinced that immune tolerance only developed due to potentially harmful immune cells being eliminated in the thymus, through a process called “central tolerance”.

    Sakaguchi, 74, showed that the immune system is more complex and discovered a previously unknown class of immune cells, which protect the body from autoimmune diseases.

    Brunkow, born in 1961 and a senior project manager at the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle, and Ramsdell, a 64-year-old senior advisor at Sonoma Biotherapeutics in San Francisco, made the other key discovery in 2001, when they were able to explain why certain mice were particularly vulnerable to autoimmune diseases.

    “They had discovered that mice have a mutation in a gene that they named Foxp3,” the jury said.

    “They also showed that mutations in the human equivalent of this gene cause a serious autoimmune disease, IPEX.”

    Two years later, Sakaguchi was able to link these discoveries.

    The trio will receive their prize — a diploma, a gold medal and $1.2 million split three ways — at a formal ceremony in Stockholm on December 10.

    Researchers from major US institutions typically dominate the Nobel science prizes, due largely to the US’ longstanding investment in basic science and academic freedoms.

    But that could change down the line following massive US budget cuts to science programmes announced by President Donald Trump.

    Since January, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has terminated 2,100 research grants totalling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch.

    Thomas Perlmann, secretary general of the committee that awards the Nobel Prize for Medicine, told AFP it was “no coincidence that the US has by far the most Nobel laureates”.

    “But there is now a creeping sense of uncertainty about the US’ willingness to maintain their leading position in research,” he said.

    Trump has meanwhile made no secret of the fact that he wants to win a Nobel himself — the Peace Prize.

    Nobel experts have however said his “America First” policies and divisive style give him little chance.

    “It’s completely unthinkable,” Oeivind Stenersen, a historian who has conducted research and co-written a book on the prize, told AFP.

    “(Trump) is in many ways the opposite of the ideals that the Nobel Prize represents,” he said, citing “multilateral cooperation” as an example.

    Trump “follows his own path, unilaterally,” Stenersen added.

    Sudan’s networks of volunteers Emergency Response Rooms (ERR) helping people survive war and famine — are seen as a possible contender this year, as are media watchdogs the Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters Without Borders, and Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny.

    Source link

  • What Is TikTok’s Benadryl Challenge? Teen Almost Dies After Attempting Viral Trend

    What Is TikTok’s Benadryl Challenge? Teen Almost Dies After Attempting Viral Trend

    A South Carolina teenager is lucky to be alive after trying TikTok’s dangerous ‘Benadryl Challenge’, a viral stunt that urges kids to swallow massive doses of the over-the-counter allergy drug.

    The incident occurred earlier this week in Horry County and left the teen hallucinating with a racing heart before being rushed to hospital in critical condition. The scare has reignited warnings from parents, doctors and regulators about the deadly risks of social media dares.

    What Is the Benadryl Challenge?

    The ‘Benadryl Challenge’ is a reckless trend spreading on TikTok and other platforms where users down alarming amounts of diphenhydramine, the active ingredient in Benadryl, to trigger hallucinations.

    Although diphenhydramine is safe when taken in correct doses to treat allergies or as a sleep aid, large quantities can act as a toxic hallucinogen.

    According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, overdosing can lead to confusion, seizures, psychosis, coma or death.

    The challenge first came to public attention in 2020 after several hospitalisations and deaths were reported in the United States. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warnings at the time, urging young people to avoid the trend and calling on TikTok to remove content that promoted it.

    The South Carolina case

    In the latest case, the mother of the South Carolina teenager discovered her daughter in distress with a heart rate near 200 beats per minute. The girl was hallucinating and later required urgent medical care.

    According to reports, pill bottles and missing tablets were found hidden under her pillow. At first the teen claimed to have taken only two pills, but a larger number was missing.

    Doctors at the hospital questioned whether the ingestion had been a suicide attempt. The girl denied this, saying she had been told by a friend that taking enough Benadryl could cause a ‘high’.

    The mother also reported finding TikTok videos about the challenge on her daughter’s phone. She said she attempted to report the videos to the platform but was informed they did not breach community guidelines.

    Previous Fatalities Linked to the Trend

    The dangers of the Benadryl Challenge have been highlighted in several previous cases. In 2020, a 15-year-old girl in Oklahoma died after taking an overdose of diphenhydramine. That same year, multiple teenagers in Texas were hospitalised following overdoses reportedly linked to the trend.

    In 2023, 13-year-old Jacob Stevens from Ohio died after consuming up to 14 Benadryl tablets while friends filmed the attempt. He suffered seizures, was placed on a ventilator and never regained consciousness. His death prompted calls from his family for tighter controls on access to the drug.

    Health Warnings and Platform Response

    Medical professionals caution that diphenhydramine overdoses can cause serious anticholinergic toxicity, producing symptoms such as delirium, rapid heart rate, seizures, memory loss and in severe cases, organ failure.

    The FDA has previously warned that even modest overdoses can be life-threatening. TikTok has said that dangerous challenges are not permitted on its platform and that it blocks related search terms.

    However, families affected by these incidents continue to argue that harmful videos remain accessible and that reporting mechanisms are inadequate.

    IBTimes UK carried out a keyword search on TikTok and found no visible content under the term ‘Benadryl challenge’.

    Instead, users are directed to a safety notice that states: ‘Your Safety Matters. Some online challenges can be dangerous, disturbing, or even fabricated. Learn how to recognise harmful challenges so you can protect your health and well-being.’

    Originally published on IBTimes UK

    Source link

  • Dolly Parton Scraps Vegas Shows Over Health Issues

    Dolly Parton Scraps Vegas Shows Over Health Issues

    Dolly Parton, 79, has postponed her upcoming Las Vegas concerts due to “health challenges,” the American country music legend announced, although she stressed she is not yet ending her glittering career.

    “As many of you know, I have been dealing with some health challenges, and my doctors tell me that I must have a few procedures,” the singer-songwriter posted on social media late Sunday, without disclosing specifics.

    The “Jolene” and “I Will Always Love You” hitmaker kept her trademark humor intact, quipping that “it must be time for my 100,000-mile check-up, although it’s not the usual trip to see my plastic surgeon!”

    “In all seriousness, given this, I am not going to be able to rehearse and put together the show that you want to see.”

    Parton was set to perform six nights of sold-out shows in December at Caesars Palace. She revealed that the new dates are set for September of 2026.

    She told her millions of followers that she would continue her projects in Nashville but would need “a little time to get show ready, as they say.

    “And don’t worry about me quittin’ the business because God hasn’t said anything about stopping yet.”

    Parton became a major star in the 1970s, with singles including “Coat of Many Colors,” and followed up with smash hits like “I Will Always Love You,” famously covered by Whitney Houston, and “9 to 5.”

    Source link

  • Dr. Rahul Bansal’s Journey from Clinical Care Provider to CEO in Redefining Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care

    Dr. Rahul Bansal’s Journey from Clinical Care Provider to CEO in Redefining Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care

    When Dr. Rahul Bansal left India to continue his research at one of the universities in Pittsburgh, he carried with him not only a passion for medicine but also a deep desire to make a positive impact in the world. That commitment has shaped his career as a respected child and adolescent psychiatrist and inspired him to create MindWeal, a company aiming to redefine how America responds to the growing mental health crisis.

    Dr. Bansal’s path has been rooted in both scholarship and service. Over the years, he has treated patients from diverse backgrounds. He has also worked at some of the nation’s leading hospitals. His wide-ranging experience across inpatient, outpatient, intensive outpatient, and residential care settings gave him unique insight into the systemic gaps in mental health delivery.

    “Everywhere I practiced, I saw the same problem: demand for child psychiatry was overwhelming, and supply was painfully limited,” Dr. Bansal explained. “We cannot bridge the gap unless we empower mid-level providers with the right training and tools.”

    That conviction became the foundation of MindWeal. Founded in 2020, the organization was born from Dr. Bansal’s earlier outpatient practice, BanCAPs, and has since evolved into a comprehensive platform that blends technology, training, and clinical care. At its core is the 1300-touch-point diagnostic tool designed to help nurse practitioners achieve the same level of diagnostic accuracy as psychiatrists. The tool has been used in clinical settings and has shown promising results in improving diagnostic consistency.

    But for Dr. Bansal, innovation is not just about numbers; it’s about people. “Families don’t come to me asking about the latest treatment trend,” he said. “They come asking what’s wrong with their child. Diagnosis is the first and most important step, and we built a tool to get it right.”

    Beyond technology, Dr. Bansal has also prioritized education and training. Recognizing that nurse practitioners often receive limited exposure to child psychiatry during their schooling, MindWeal developed structured rotations and mentorship programs. Providers are supported in learning how to use the tool and in developing confidence around prescribing, managing medications, and engaging with families in meaningful ways.

    “You cannot build a sustainable system without empowering providers,” Dr. Bansal emphasized. “Mid-level providers are the backbone of mental health care. By giving them the right resources, we give children and families better outcomes.”

    Dr. Bansal’s influence extends beyond the clinic. He has authored multiple papers in psychiatry and is known for his research in autism and developmental disorders. His academic background continues to inform his vision for MindWeal, where evidence-based practice is a guiding principle.

    Under his leadership, MindWeal has grown into four practices across Illinois and Missouri, with plans to expand nationally. The company offers in-person, hybrid, and virtual care, balancing local trust with scalability. Patients and families have responded positively to MindWeal’s approach.

    Despite his success, Dr. Bansal remains grounded in his mission. “My inspiration is simple, I want to make a positive difference every day,” he reflected. “If we can bring clarity to families, empower providers, and create better outcomes for children, then we are doing something that truly matters.”

    Colleagues and collaborators echo his impact. Dr. Bansal’s efforts have begun to draw interest from healthcare systems and insurers, who see the potential of the new tool and MindWeal’s ecosystem to transform psychiatric care delivery at scale.

    Looking ahead, Dr. Bansal is focused not only on expanding MindWeal’s reach but also on shaping the national conversation about mental health. He is a vocal advocate for closing the gap between traditional psychiatric care and the innovative solutions emerging from technology and training. “The system is fragmented,” he said. “But we have the opportunity to rebuild it in a way that prioritizes accuracy, accessibility, and compassion.”

    From his early days training in child psychiatry in Michigan to his current role as CEO and thought leader, Dr. Rahul Bansal’s journey has been defined by vision, perseverance, and a relentless commitment to children’s well-being. With MindWeal, he is demonstrating how individual determination can contribute to broader change, and that the future of mental health care can be both innovative and deeply human.

    Source link

  • Over A Dozen Sunscreens Pulled From Shelves After Watchdog Exposes Major Flaw

    Over A Dozen Sunscreens Pulled From Shelves After Watchdog Exposes Major Flaw

    The makers of over a dozen suncreams have halted sales in Australia after a consumer advocacy group analysis found many of them did not provide the sun protection factor their makers claimed.

    Long, hot days in the sun are a fixture of daily life in Australia, famous for its good weather and outdoors-loving lifestyle.

    But the country also has the highest rate of skin cancer in the world — almost 19,000 Australians were estimated to be diagnosed with melanoma in 2024, official data shows.

    And an investigation in June by consumer group CHOICE found that of 20 popular brands of suncream tested, only four accurately matched their Sun Protection Factor (SPF) claims.

    A follow-up investigation by the Therapeutic Goods Administration released on Tuesday identified 21 suncreams that may fall short of their protection claims.

    In some cases, products that claimed to have sun protection factors of 50+ “were unlikely to have an SPF greater than 21”, the authority said.

    Of the flagged suncreams, eight have been voluntarily recalled, 10 have suspended sales, two are being reviewed and one is not sold nationally, according to the authority.

    “You may wish to consider using an alternative product until the TGA completes its review,” the agency warned.

    AFP has reached out to a number of the firms named for comment on the claims.

    Under current testing standards, things like how much suncream is applied and the degree of skin redness observed can impact the variability of results.

    Australia classifies suncreams under therapeutic goods — health-related products for human use rather than cosmetics — and are therefore regulated to ensure their safety and efficacy.

    Firms can face heavy penalties for inaccurate labelling.

    Anne Cust, acting director of cancer research institute Daffodil Centre, said suncream was “just one of the forms of protection”.

    She said people should apply suncream “as a last resort” and use it alongside other protective measures like seeking shade and wearing long sleeves.

    “The most important thing with sunscreen is to apply enough of it,” she said. “What is important is to put enough on your skin and reapply after a couple of hours.”

    The issue was particularly pressing given the looming summer season, Vice President of the Australian Medical Association Julian Rait told national broadcaster ABC.

    “People should still have confidence in the vast majority of suncream products, and they should still provide adequate protection from the sun, especially if used frequently,” he said.

    Source link

  • Parents Express Concern After President Donald Trump Brings Back Presidential Fitness Test

    Parents Express Concern After President Donald Trump Brings Back Presidential Fitness Test

    President Donald Trump’s decision to bring back the Presidential Fitness Test has sparked intense debate among parents nationwide.

    The test, which was phased out in 2013 during former President Barack Obama’s administration, will once again require students to perform physical challenges, including the mile run, sit-ups, push-ups, and flexibility tests. Many parents remember their own experiences with the test and express serious concerns about its impact on their children’s mental health and self-esteem.

    The announcement came in July 2025 when Trump signed an executive order surrounded by professional athletes in the White House Roosevelt Room. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will oversee the program as part of the broader “Make America Healthy Again” initiative. The order states that declining physical fitness poses “a threat to the vitality and longevity of our country” and weakens America’s economy, military readiness, and national morale, according to Cronkite News.

    Concerns Among Parents

    Parents across the country are sharing their own childhood experiences with the test, and many memories are far from positive. “I remember how hurtful this program was when we were in school. Traumatic and bullying. Hopeless,” wrote Mike from Salem, New Hampshire, in response to media polls about the test’s return. Similar sentiments are echoing through social media platforms and parent groups nationwide.

    The original Presidential Fitness Test, which ran from 1966 to 2013, required students to meet specific benchmarks to earn awards. For example, a 14-year-old girl needed to run a mile in under eight minutes, complete 40 sit-and-reaches, shuttle-run in about 10 seconds, and do 47 curl-ups to qualify for recognition, among other things, 29News reported.

    Physical education expert Judy LoBianco, who worked in New Jersey schools for over two decades, believes the test can embarrass less athletic kids, make them anxious, and discourage them from pursuing fitness. She argues that modern physical education should focus on joy, social interaction, and life skills rather than competitive testing.

    Implementation Questions Remain

    Parents are also questioning the practical aspects of the revived program, as many wonder whether schools with lower-performing students will receive additional resources, better meals, and improved physical education equipment.

    The Trump administration has positioned the test as part of a broader focus on youth health, citing concerning statistics about childhood obesity and physical inactivity. Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” report highlights that more than 70% of children ages six to 17 fail to meet federal guidelines for daily physical activity, as per NPR.



    Originally published on parentherald.com

    © {{Year}} ParentHerald.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

    Source link

  • Did COVID Lockdowns Doom Britain’s Youth? Inquiry Reveals Childhood ‘Torn Apart’ – Lasting Harm Was No Secret

    Did COVID Lockdowns Doom Britain’s Youth? Inquiry Reveals Childhood ‘Torn Apart’ – Lasting Harm Was No Secret

    In a stark revelation shaking Britain’s pandemic response, the UK COVID-19 Inquiry on 29 September 2025 exposed how lockdowns inflicted grievous harm on children, tearing at the very fabric of childhood through school closures and enforced isolation.

    Witnesses detailed severe, long-lasting impacts on education, mental health, and social development, with government decisions prioritising adults over youth despite known risks. As testimonies unfolded, it became clear that lasting harm to Britain’s youth was no secret, yet officials proceeded, dooming a generation to profound consequences.

    Inquiry Exposes Grievous Harm

    The inquiry’s major research report, published 15 September 2025, drew from interviews with 600 children aged 9-22, highlighting disrupted routines and missed milestones as an ‘empty time‘ of pandemic effects.

    Participants described family tensions and emotional drain, with one noting: ‘That was, like, very difficult having my mum, my auntie, my uncle; my brother was there as well and my cousin. So it was a very crowded place. It was also very, like, emotionally draining with kind of like family stuff. So I did end up, like, developing anxiety… I was very sad a lot of the time…’ This underscores how COVID lockdowns amplified home-based vulnerabilities for Britain’s youth.

    School Closures Chaos

    Government planning for school closures began only on 17 March 2020, the day before the announcement, despite earlier focus on keeping schools open. Former education secretary Gavin Williamson described the shift as a ‘discombobulating 24-hour sea change,’ highlighting inadequate preparation across UK nations. This failure exacerbated education disruption, with children missing crucial learning and social interactions.

    Online learning challenges included limited device access, as one child said: ‘I learn best when I have a physical thing in front of me …’ Exam cancellations and grade frustrations affected university aspirations, compounding long-term impacts.

    Vulnerable children suffered most, with schools as ‘constant eyes‘ for safeguarding; closures led to declined referrals and increased exposure to harm. The National Crime Agency noted rises in online abuse due to more time spent digitally during lockdowns.

    Mental Health Crisis Unveiled

    Post-lockdown readjustment proved tough, with one participant stating: ‘Not leaving the house… and then having to try and get used to being in public again, and going to school… definitely contributed to, like, my anxiety being a lot worse.’ Mental health issues surged, including body image worries and first-time service access among secondary-aged youth.

    Inquiry counsel Clair Dobbin KC emphasised: ‘The reality is that there were children who suffered grievous harm at the hands of their carers during the pandemic. The carers of those children bear responsibility for the violence and neglect inflicted on children, and these children stand as the starkest examples of what adults are capable of doing to children behind closed doors.’

    This highlights how lockdowns removed protective layers, leading to abuse and neglect.

    In an X post from LBC, it was shared: ‘Some children suffered “grievous harm” at the hands of those who should have been caring for them in the pandemic, the UK COVID-19 Inquiry has heard.’ Such public reactions amplify the inquiry’s findings.


    Baroness Heather Hallett noted the impact was ‘severe and, for many, long-lasting,’ urging lessons for future crises. Children’s rights groups called for apologies and prioritisation of youth in decisions.

    The four-week hearings, starting 29 September 2025, probe physical health, long COVID, and high absence rates, revealing systemic oversights. Stories from parents like Aisha illustrate ongoing struggles, with her son lacking education and facing trouble post-lockdown.

    Originally published on IBTimes UK



    Source link

  • Cytotoxic Drug Exposure, Genotoxicity, and the Unseen Risk to Autism

    Cytotoxic Drug Exposure, Genotoxicity, and the Unseen Risk to Autism

    For more than two decades, Jim Mullowney has been sounding the alarm about a problem many don’t want to confront: the hidden risks associated with human waste from cytotoxic drugs. As the founder of Pharma-Cycle, a company dedicated to providing safe collection and disposal systems for the urine, feces, and vomit of patients containing cytotoxic drugs, Mullowney has devoted his career to preventing birth defects, including autism, childhood cancer, and others.

    “I first realized what we were dealing with when I saw syringes full of chemotherapy drugs being mishandled at a hazardous waste facility,” recalls Mullowney. “These were not ordinary chemicals; many of them are cytotoxic, designed to alter the DNA of rapidly dividing cells, such as a child being born. They are life-saving in the right medical context, but their second-hand exposure is disastrous.”

    Cytotoxic drugs are indispensable in cancer care. They aim to target rapidly dividing cancer cells. But their second-hand potency has an enormous duality. While essential in treatment, their genotoxic nature means they can affect other fast-growing healthy cells, such as those in hair, skin, or the reproductive system of men and women of childbearing age, a known risk to fertility. This presents a major public health challenge because these hazardous agents can be shed by patients not just in urine and feces, but also in sweat, vomit, and saliva. That duality, which is at the heart of their therapeutic power yet makes them hazardous outside strict controls, is the undeniable reality at the core of Mullowney’s mission.

    “The reality is that hospitals handle these substances with extraordinary caution,” he explains. “You will see pharmacists working behind multi-million-dollar systems with robots mixing doses in sealed environments. Nurses wear protective gear. But after a patient receives treatment, they go home, and just like the vitamin you took this morning, where your urine looks like you ate a highlighter, the drugs continue to leave their system. That’s where the oversight drops off.”

    Mullowney also raises questions about potential connections between environmental exposures and conditions such as autism. While autism is widely understood as a complex neurodevelopmental condition with both genetic and environmental influences, Mullowney believes the role of hazardous drugs in shaping DNA deserves closer examination. “If autism has a genetic component, and we know certain chemicals are designed specifically to alter DNA, then it’s at least worth asking what impact secondhand exposure to cytotoxic drugs could have,” he says. Although no definitive link has been established, he argues that the issue highlights the need for expanded research into how these substances may affect future generations.

    Scientific literature has documented for decades that cytotoxic drugs are hazardous even in small amounts. The United States Pharmacopoeia, known as USP800, has long recognized the risks to healthcare workers under USP Chapter 800 exposed during preparation or administration. Mullowney believes the same awareness needs to extend beyond the hospital walls.

    “We know these drugs are excreted in sweat, urine, and stool,” he says. “Once outside controlled settings, they don’t just disappear. They can end up in wastewater, septic systems, and even on household surfaces. That raises questions about who else could be exposed, and what the long-term consequences might be.”

    While research has shown increased rates of miscarriage and birth defects among healthcare workers exposed to cytotoxic drugs, the broader impact on families and communities is less well studied. “Nobody disputes the toxicity of these substances,” he notes. “The gap is in connecting that knowledge to how we manage drug waste once patients leave the hospital.”

    Pharma-Cycle was founded to address precisely that gap. The company develops collection systems that aim to safely capture hazardous pharmaceutical waste before it contaminates our families and future generations, as well as enters the environment. “The simplest way to put it,” Mullowney explains, “is that we can’t treat these drugs like ordinary trash. They need a closed-loop system, collected, contained, and destroyed in a way that protects public health.”

    The challenge, he admits, is not technological but political. “The science is there. Various well-known safety and health agencies have recognized the dangers of cytotoxic drugs for decades. What’s missing is the will to standardize and enforce proper collection. Too often, regulatory agencies pass responsibility back and forth, and the result is inaction.”

    Mullowney believes broader change requires public awareness. “Most people don’t know this issue exists,” he says. “Hazardous cytotoxic drug waste rarely makes headlines.”

    That’s why he continues to advocate, not only as a business owner but as a father. “I’m not doing this for money,” Mullowney says. “I’m doing it because I have seen what these chemicals are and how poorly they have been handled. If we know these drugs can be harmful in microdoses, why aren’t we taking every step to prevent unnecessary exposure?”

    For Mullowney, the path forward is clear: improve public understanding, strengthen regulations, and implement proven systems for safe disposal. “We put a car on the moon,” he says, “but we still have not figured out how to consistently keep cytotoxic drugs out of our environment. That needs to change.”

    The urgency of his message is not rooted in alarmism but in precaution. As he says, “These are lifesaving medicines, and we will always need them. But if we don’t handle the waste responsibly, we could risk creating problems for future generations, including autism and other birth defects. Prevention is always better than repair.”

    Source link