Category: Diseases & Conditions

  • Parents Express Concern After President Donald Trump Brings Back Presidential Fitness Test

    Parents Express Concern After President Donald Trump Brings Back Presidential Fitness Test

    President Donald Trump’s decision to bring back the Presidential Fitness Test has sparked intense debate among parents nationwide.

    The test, which was phased out in 2013 during former President Barack Obama’s administration, will once again require students to perform physical challenges, including the mile run, sit-ups, push-ups, and flexibility tests. Many parents remember their own experiences with the test and express serious concerns about its impact on their children’s mental health and self-esteem.

    The announcement came in July 2025 when Trump signed an executive order surrounded by professional athletes in the White House Roosevelt Room. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will oversee the program as part of the broader “Make America Healthy Again” initiative. The order states that declining physical fitness poses “a threat to the vitality and longevity of our country” and weakens America’s economy, military readiness, and national morale, according to Cronkite News.

    Concerns Among Parents

    Parents across the country are sharing their own childhood experiences with the test, and many memories are far from positive. “I remember how hurtful this program was when we were in school. Traumatic and bullying. Hopeless,” wrote Mike from Salem, New Hampshire, in response to media polls about the test’s return. Similar sentiments are echoing through social media platforms and parent groups nationwide.

    The original Presidential Fitness Test, which ran from 1966 to 2013, required students to meet specific benchmarks to earn awards. For example, a 14-year-old girl needed to run a mile in under eight minutes, complete 40 sit-and-reaches, shuttle-run in about 10 seconds, and do 47 curl-ups to qualify for recognition, among other things, 29News reported.

    Physical education expert Judy LoBianco, who worked in New Jersey schools for over two decades, believes the test can embarrass less athletic kids, make them anxious, and discourage them from pursuing fitness. She argues that modern physical education should focus on joy, social interaction, and life skills rather than competitive testing.

    Implementation Questions Remain

    Parents are also questioning the practical aspects of the revived program, as many wonder whether schools with lower-performing students will receive additional resources, better meals, and improved physical education equipment.

    The Trump administration has positioned the test as part of a broader focus on youth health, citing concerning statistics about childhood obesity and physical inactivity. Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” report highlights that more than 70% of children ages six to 17 fail to meet federal guidelines for daily physical activity, as per NPR.



    Originally published on parentherald.com

    © {{Year}} ParentHerald.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

    Source link

  • Did COVID Lockdowns Doom Britain’s Youth? Inquiry Reveals Childhood ‘Torn Apart’ – Lasting Harm Was No Secret

    Did COVID Lockdowns Doom Britain’s Youth? Inquiry Reveals Childhood ‘Torn Apart’ – Lasting Harm Was No Secret

    In a stark revelation shaking Britain’s pandemic response, the UK COVID-19 Inquiry on 29 September 2025 exposed how lockdowns inflicted grievous harm on children, tearing at the very fabric of childhood through school closures and enforced isolation.

    Witnesses detailed severe, long-lasting impacts on education, mental health, and social development, with government decisions prioritising adults over youth despite known risks. As testimonies unfolded, it became clear that lasting harm to Britain’s youth was no secret, yet officials proceeded, dooming a generation to profound consequences.

    Inquiry Exposes Grievous Harm

    The inquiry’s major research report, published 15 September 2025, drew from interviews with 600 children aged 9-22, highlighting disrupted routines and missed milestones as an ‘empty time‘ of pandemic effects.

    Participants described family tensions and emotional drain, with one noting: ‘That was, like, very difficult having my mum, my auntie, my uncle; my brother was there as well and my cousin. So it was a very crowded place. It was also very, like, emotionally draining with kind of like family stuff. So I did end up, like, developing anxiety… I was very sad a lot of the time…’ This underscores how COVID lockdowns amplified home-based vulnerabilities for Britain’s youth.

    School Closures Chaos

    Government planning for school closures began only on 17 March 2020, the day before the announcement, despite earlier focus on keeping schools open. Former education secretary Gavin Williamson described the shift as a ‘discombobulating 24-hour sea change,’ highlighting inadequate preparation across UK nations. This failure exacerbated education disruption, with children missing crucial learning and social interactions.

    Online learning challenges included limited device access, as one child said: ‘I learn best when I have a physical thing in front of me …’ Exam cancellations and grade frustrations affected university aspirations, compounding long-term impacts.

    Vulnerable children suffered most, with schools as ‘constant eyes‘ for safeguarding; closures led to declined referrals and increased exposure to harm. The National Crime Agency noted rises in online abuse due to more time spent digitally during lockdowns.

    Mental Health Crisis Unveiled

    Post-lockdown readjustment proved tough, with one participant stating: ‘Not leaving the house… and then having to try and get used to being in public again, and going to school… definitely contributed to, like, my anxiety being a lot worse.’ Mental health issues surged, including body image worries and first-time service access among secondary-aged youth.

    Inquiry counsel Clair Dobbin KC emphasised: ‘The reality is that there were children who suffered grievous harm at the hands of their carers during the pandemic. The carers of those children bear responsibility for the violence and neglect inflicted on children, and these children stand as the starkest examples of what adults are capable of doing to children behind closed doors.’

    This highlights how lockdowns removed protective layers, leading to abuse and neglect.

    In an X post from LBC, it was shared: ‘Some children suffered “grievous harm” at the hands of those who should have been caring for them in the pandemic, the UK COVID-19 Inquiry has heard.’ Such public reactions amplify the inquiry’s findings.


    Baroness Heather Hallett noted the impact was ‘severe and, for many, long-lasting,’ urging lessons for future crises. Children’s rights groups called for apologies and prioritisation of youth in decisions.

    The four-week hearings, starting 29 September 2025, probe physical health, long COVID, and high absence rates, revealing systemic oversights. Stories from parents like Aisha illustrate ongoing struggles, with her son lacking education and facing trouble post-lockdown.

    Originally published on IBTimes UK



    Source link

  • Cytotoxic Drug Exposure, Genotoxicity, and the Unseen Risk to Autism

    Cytotoxic Drug Exposure, Genotoxicity, and the Unseen Risk to Autism

    For more than two decades, Jim Mullowney has been sounding the alarm about a problem many don’t want to confront: the hidden risks associated with human waste from cytotoxic drugs. As the founder of Pharma-Cycle, a company dedicated to providing safe collection and disposal systems for the urine, feces, and vomit of patients containing cytotoxic drugs, Mullowney has devoted his career to preventing birth defects, including autism, childhood cancer, and others.

    “I first realized what we were dealing with when I saw syringes full of chemotherapy drugs being mishandled at a hazardous waste facility,” recalls Mullowney. “These were not ordinary chemicals; many of them are cytotoxic, designed to alter the DNA of rapidly dividing cells, such as a child being born. They are life-saving in the right medical context, but their second-hand exposure is disastrous.”

    Cytotoxic drugs are indispensable in cancer care. They aim to target rapidly dividing cancer cells. But their second-hand potency has an enormous duality. While essential in treatment, their genotoxic nature means they can affect other fast-growing healthy cells, such as those in hair, skin, or the reproductive system of men and women of childbearing age, a known risk to fertility. This presents a major public health challenge because these hazardous agents can be shed by patients not just in urine and feces, but also in sweat, vomit, and saliva. That duality, which is at the heart of their therapeutic power yet makes them hazardous outside strict controls, is the undeniable reality at the core of Mullowney’s mission.

    “The reality is that hospitals handle these substances with extraordinary caution,” he explains. “You will see pharmacists working behind multi-million-dollar systems with robots mixing doses in sealed environments. Nurses wear protective gear. But after a patient receives treatment, they go home, and just like the vitamin you took this morning, where your urine looks like you ate a highlighter, the drugs continue to leave their system. That’s where the oversight drops off.”

    Mullowney also raises questions about potential connections between environmental exposures and conditions such as autism. While autism is widely understood as a complex neurodevelopmental condition with both genetic and environmental influences, Mullowney believes the role of hazardous drugs in shaping DNA deserves closer examination. “If autism has a genetic component, and we know certain chemicals are designed specifically to alter DNA, then it’s at least worth asking what impact secondhand exposure to cytotoxic drugs could have,” he says. Although no definitive link has been established, he argues that the issue highlights the need for expanded research into how these substances may affect future generations.

    Scientific literature has documented for decades that cytotoxic drugs are hazardous even in small amounts. The United States Pharmacopoeia, known as USP800, has long recognized the risks to healthcare workers under USP Chapter 800 exposed during preparation or administration. Mullowney believes the same awareness needs to extend beyond the hospital walls.

    “We know these drugs are excreted in sweat, urine, and stool,” he says. “Once outside controlled settings, they don’t just disappear. They can end up in wastewater, septic systems, and even on household surfaces. That raises questions about who else could be exposed, and what the long-term consequences might be.”

    While research has shown increased rates of miscarriage and birth defects among healthcare workers exposed to cytotoxic drugs, the broader impact on families and communities is less well studied. “Nobody disputes the toxicity of these substances,” he notes. “The gap is in connecting that knowledge to how we manage drug waste once patients leave the hospital.”

    Pharma-Cycle was founded to address precisely that gap. The company develops collection systems that aim to safely capture hazardous pharmaceutical waste before it contaminates our families and future generations, as well as enters the environment. “The simplest way to put it,” Mullowney explains, “is that we can’t treat these drugs like ordinary trash. They need a closed-loop system, collected, contained, and destroyed in a way that protects public health.”

    The challenge, he admits, is not technological but political. “The science is there. Various well-known safety and health agencies have recognized the dangers of cytotoxic drugs for decades. What’s missing is the will to standardize and enforce proper collection. Too often, regulatory agencies pass responsibility back and forth, and the result is inaction.”

    Mullowney believes broader change requires public awareness. “Most people don’t know this issue exists,” he says. “Hazardous cytotoxic drug waste rarely makes headlines.”

    That’s why he continues to advocate, not only as a business owner but as a father. “I’m not doing this for money,” Mullowney says. “I’m doing it because I have seen what these chemicals are and how poorly they have been handled. If we know these drugs can be harmful in microdoses, why aren’t we taking every step to prevent unnecessary exposure?”

    For Mullowney, the path forward is clear: improve public understanding, strengthen regulations, and implement proven systems for safe disposal. “We put a car on the moon,” he says, “but we still have not figured out how to consistently keep cytotoxic drugs out of our environment. That needs to change.”

    The urgency of his message is not rooted in alarmism but in precaution. As he says, “These are lifesaving medicines, and we will always need them. But if we don’t handle the waste responsibly, we could risk creating problems for future generations, including autism and other birth defects. Prevention is always better than repair.”

    Source link

  • What Type of Cancer Was He Diagnosed With and Is He Still Sick?

    What Type of Cancer Was He Diagnosed With and Is He Still Sick?

    James Van Der Beek’s unexpected cameo during the Dawson’s Creek reunion concert has fans once again asking tough questions: what type of cancer is the actor battling, and is he still fighting the disease?

    The 48-year-old star, forever remembered as Dawson Leery in the hit ’90s teen drama, first revealed in 2024 that he was facing a serious health battle.

    Though he couldn’t join the live event in New York, his virtual appearance reignited speculation and worry among fans, many of whom took to social media to express both concern and support.

    What Does James Van Der Beek Have?

    In an interview with People in November 2024, James Van Der Beek confirmed that he is battling Stage 3 colorectal cancer.

    ‘I have colorectal cancer. I’ve been privately dealing with this diagnosis and have been taking steps to resolve it, with the support of my incredible family,’ the actor said.

    This form of cancer affects the colon or rectum and is often detected during routine screenings such as colonoscopies. According to Mayo Clinic, symptoms can include persistent changes in bowel habits, abdominal discomfort, and weight loss without trying.

    Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide, and early detection is considered key in improving survival rates. Van Der Beek’s openness about his illness has drawn attention to the importance of awareness, especially among younger adults who might overlook potential symptoms.

    James Van Der Beek’s Illness Timeline

    The actor first went public with his diagnosis in 2024, stating that he was undergoing treatment while continuing to focus on his family life. Van Der Beek and his wife, Kimberly, share six children, and he has often credited them as his motivation during his health struggles.

    In September 2025, Van Der Beek was due to appear at a one-night-only live reading of the Dawson’s Creek pilot script at the Richard Rodgers Theatre in New York. The event was organised as a reunion for fans and a fundraiser for the charity F Cancer. Just days before the reunion, Van Der Beek announced that he would not be attending in person after suffering from separate stomach viruses on top of his cancer battle.

    Although unable to take the stage, he surprised fans with a pre-recorded video appearance. In the clip, he thanked the audience, cast, and organisers, introducing Lin-Manuel Miranda as his understudy for the evening.

    @goss.ie #JamesVanDerBeek made an unexpected virtual appearance during the #DawsonsCreek reunion charity event on Monday night, after previously withdrawing due to illness. The star-studded charity event featured a live reading of the show’s pilot episode and brought together beloved Dawson’s Creek cast members including Michelle Williams, Katie Holmes, Joshua Jackson, Mary Beth Peil, John Wesley Shipp, Mary-Margaret Humes, Nina Repeta, Kerr Smith, Meredith Monroe, and Busy Philipps ❤️ Directed by Dawson’s Creek alum Jason Moore, the event supported F Cancer and also honored Van Der Beek, who was diagnosed with stage 3 colorectal cancer last year. 🎥 @backtoyoubobpod #dawsonscreekreunion ♬ original sound – Goss.ie


    Is James Van Der Beek Still Sick?

    The question ‘is James Van Der Beek sick?’ has become a trending search as fans follow his health updates. His absence from the reunion highlighted that he is still managing illness alongside treatment. While the actor has not disclosed specific details of his current medical regimen, his comments and public appearances confirm that his fight with cancer is ongoing.

    Support from his wife Kimberly and their children has been central to his journey. The family have shared glimpses of their life on social media, showing both the challenges and moments of hope as he continues treatment.

    Dawson’s Creek Reunion and Public Support

    The Dawson’s Creek reunion drew significant attention not only for nostalgia but also for its charitable cause. The event raised funds for F Cancer, an organisation dedicated to cancer education and early detection.

    Fans responded with strong messages of support for Van Der Beek after his video message was played at the theatre.

    Lin-Manuel Miranda’s appearance as Dawson Leery was also widely discussed, but it was Van Der Beek’s heartfelt words that left a lasting impression. Many fans took to social media to express admiration for his strength and resilience.

    Originally published on IBTimes UK



    Source link

  • First Successful Gene Therapy for Huntington’s Disease Slows Disease Progression by 75%

    First Successful Gene Therapy for Huntington’s Disease Slows Disease Progression by 75%

    An experimental gene therapy developed by uniQure has, for the first time, shown a dramatic slowing of Huntington’s disease progression in human patients, offering hope for a condition long considered incurable.

    How the Trial Worked

    The therapy, called AMT-130, was administered via a one-time neurosurgical procedure lasting 12 to 20 hours using a modified viral vector to deliver corrective DNA to regions of the brain affected by the disease. Patients treated with a high dose saw their disease progress 75% more slowly over a 36-month period compared to matched external controls. Secondary outcomes showed a 60% slower decline in functional abilities. The treatment was generally well-tolerated, with no major new safety concerns reported.

    Sarah Tabrizi, director of UCL’s Huntington’s Disease Centre, said these findings mark “We now have a treatment for one of the world’s more terrible diseases. This is absolutely huge. I’m really overjoyed.” uniQure now plans to submit a Biologics License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in early 2026.

    Regulatory Advances & Future Steps

    Earlier in 2025, the FDA granted AMT-130 Breakthrough Therapy designation, which may expedite review and regulatory pathways. In a regulatory update, uniQure disclosed that it is aligning key analytic and manufacturing plans with FDA guidance ahead of the BLA submission.

    The company intends to use external control data sets, like ENROLL-HD, for primary comparisons in its statistical analysis plan.

    Why This Breakthrough Is So Significant

    • Disease-modifying therapy: Until now, Huntington’s treatments have only addressed symptoms; AMT-130 indicates the possibility of altering disease trajectory.
    • One-time administration: Because it is delivered via a single surgical procedure, its benefits—if durable—could last years without repeated dosing.
    • High unmet need: In the U.S., about 41,000 people live with Huntington’s and over 200,000 carry risk alleles.
    • Scientific validation: The magnitude of effect in this trial is among the most convincing in neurodegenerative disease research to date.

    How AMT-130 Compares to Other Gene Therapies

    AMT-130’s approach—one-time neurosurgical delivery of a vector designed to suppress the mutant huntingtin protein—is somewhat unique among genetic therapies, in both delivery method and disease target.

    Here are some points of comparison:

    Therapy Mode of Delivery / Regimen Indication / Age Group Key Strengths Known Limitations / Risks
    AMT-130 (uniQure) Single stereotactic brain surgery (direct striatal infusion) Early-manifest Huntington’s disease Promising stabilization of function, one-time treatment, demonstrable biomarker improvements Surgical risks, inflammatory complications, durable long-term efficacy unknown
    Zolgensma (Onasemnogene abeparvovec-AVXS-101) Single intravenous or intrathecal in some trials Spinal Muscular Atrophy (infants and older children) Has shown dramatic improvements in survival, motor function; among best-known successful gene therapies Very high cost, immune reactions, limited age window, administration logistics
    Nusinersen (Spinraza) Repeated intrathecal injections (ongoing) SMA across age groups Reduces disease burden, extends life, widely used; well-understood safety profile Requires regular dosing, invasiveness, burdens on patients/caregivers, cost

    Cautions and Limitations

    • Not a cure: While the slowing is impressive, it does not reverse the disease or fully stop its course.
    • Surgery risk and cost: The invasive nature and complexity of delivery limit its applicability, especially in less capable surgical settings.
    • Long-term durability unknown: Whether the effect holds beyond three years remains to be seen.
    • Regulatory and access hurdles: Approval does not guarantee access, and pricing, reimbursement, and manufacturing scale remain major challenges.

    Source link

  • CDC Report Shows More Children Are Either Dying or Becoming Severely Ill With Flu Amid Declining Vaccination Rates

    CDC Report Shows More Children Are Either Dying or Becoming Severely Ill With Flu Amid Declining Vaccination Rates

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a report showing that more and more children are either dying or becoming severely ill with the flu amid declining vaccination rates in the United States.

    Now, cases of pediatric acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE) are on the rise, with 109 children being diagnosed during the 2024-25 flu season. This is a rare inflammatory brain disease caused by the illness.

    Rise in Flu-Related Deaths Among Kids

    A new report also showed that 84% of kids who have influenza-associated encephalopathy whose vaccination status was known were not vaccinated. This comes as the country recorded 280 pediatric flu deaths last year, which is the deadliest since the 2009-10 H1N1 pandemic.

    A pediatric infectious disease physician at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Dr. Buddy Creech, said that they do not always know how to predict which children are going to get the most severe forms of flu. This is why they recommend the vaccine for everyone, according to NBC News.

    ANE is considered a rare disease, as there are only a handful of cases recorded every year, and it has never been formally tracked. However, this year, doctors noted an increase in kids affected by the brain inflammation after suffering from the flu.

    A pediatric neurologist at Boston Children’s Hospital, Dr. Molly Wilson-Murphy, said that they are not yet sure if there really is an increase in real numbers. However, being on the ground as a physician, she was struck that it certainly is.

    The National Foundation for Infectious Diseases also underscored the crucial role that annual flu vaccinations play in preventing serious illness, particularly among children. The CDC recommends the shots for everyone aged six months and older yearly, KSTE reported.

    A Decline in Vaccination Rates

    Despite the decline in vaccination rates, the CDC continues to advocate for flu shots, saying these are the most effective way to protect kids from severe flu-related complications, as well as death.

    The situation comes after the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recently voted to change recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine. These recommendations must still be approved by the CDC director in order to become official guidance.

    Advice on the COVID-19 vaccine differs from the flu shots, as the CDC said parents of healthy children aged six months to 17 years should talk about the benefits with a health care provider. The CDC broadly recommends the vaccine for moderately or severely immunocompromised kids, as per CBS News.



    Originally published on parentherald.com

    © {{Year}} ParentHerald.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

    Source link

  • Where To Get Huntington’s Disease Treatment? Hope Flows As Doctors Claim First Patient Cured From Neuro Illness

    Where To Get Huntington’s Disease Treatment? Hope Flows As Doctors Claim First Patient Cured From Neuro Illness

    In a groundbreaking development, researchers in the UK have reported the first-ever successful treatment for Huntington’s disease, a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder previously deemed incurable. The experimental gene therapy, known as AMT-130, slowed disease progression by 75% over three years, offering renewed hope to patients and families affected by the condition.

    What Is Huntington’s Disease?

    Huntington’s disease is a progressive neurological disorder caused by a mutation in the HTT gene, leading to the production of a toxic protein that damages brain cells. Symptoms typically manifest in mid-adulthood and include motor dysfunction, cognitive decline, and psychiatric disturbances. The disease is fatal, with patients often succumbing within 15–20 years of symptom onset.

    The Breakthrough Treatment

    Led by Professor Sarah Tabrizi at University College London (UCL), the pioneering clinical trial utilised an innovative gene therapy approach. The treatment involves a one-time surgical procedure lasting up to 20 hours, during which a specially engineered, harmless virus is infused directly into the brain. This virus carries a DNA strand designed to deactivate the mutant huntingtin protein responsible for the disease.

    The results have been nothing short of remarkable. According to a press release from UCL, patients who underwent the treatment experienced a 75% reduction in the expected progression of the disease over a three-year period. Instead of the expected rapid decline, these patients maintained neurological function, effectively gaining years of quality life.

    Expert Insights

    Professor Tabrizi expressed her astonishment at the results, stating, ‘We never in our wildest dreams would have expected a 75% slowing of clinical progression.’ She emphasised that this breakthrough could pave the way for earlier interventions, potentially preventing the onset of symptoms altogether.

    Where to Access Huntington’s Disease Treatment in the UK

    For individuals seeking treatment or support for Huntington’s disease, the UK offers several renowned centres specialising in diagnosis, care, and research:

    • University College London (UCL) Institute of Neurology: A leading research and clinical centre focusing on Huntington’s disease, offering multidisciplinary care and conducting pioneering clinical trials.
    • Cardiff University Huntington’s Disease Centre: A prominent centre dedicated to research and coordination of Huntington’s disease studies across South Wales.
    • Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability: Specialises in providing care and support for patients with complex needs due to Huntington’s disease.
    • Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust: Offers follow-up services for individuals diagnosed with Huntington’s disease, including participation in clinical trials.

    These institutions are at the forefront of Huntington’s disease care and research, providing essential services to patients and families affected by the condition.

    Global Implications

    Approximately 6,000 to 10,000 individuals in the UK are affected by Huntington’s disease, with many more at risk due to family history. The success of this gene therapy trial has the potential to revolutionise treatment approaches globally.

    Biotechnology company UniQure plans to seek approval for the therapy in the United States, signalling a new era in the fight against this devastating disorder.

    Looking Ahead

    While gene therapy presents a promising avenue for treatment, the procedure remains complex and expensive. As the medical community continues to assess its long-term efficacy and accessibility, this breakthrough stands as a powerful testament to scientific innovation and its potential to transform lives.

    Originally published on IBTimes UK

    Source link

  • How MOA Reimagined Mental Health Support at the Traverse Academy

    How MOA Reimagined Mental Health Support at the Traverse Academy

    In a time where children face not just academic pressures but increasing mental health crises, from anxiety and depression to the unimaginable trauma of school shootings and suicide loss, architecture would rarely be the first thought in the conversation. But at MOA Architecture, it is more than just a structure. It is an intervention, backed by careful design.

    The Denver-based firm, known for its thoughtful, human-centered design, recently completed a pilot project with Cherry Creek School District: Traverse Academy, a day-treatment facility owned and operated by a public school district. The project wasn’t just another commission. For MOA, it was a mission. And for President and Director of Healthcare Design Katie Vander Putten, it was deeply personal.

    “After COVID, suicide became one of the leading causes of death among students in some districts,” she says. “And across Colorado, the number of facilities for youth mental health care has dwindled. We knew something had to change,” Vander Putten says.

    Traverse Academy is a therapeutic school environment for students in grades 4–12 experiencing acute mental health challenges, from severe trauma to transitional anxiety. It merges clinical treatment with education in a safe, supportive environment designed not just for learning, but for healing.

    Split into three tiers: Severe, Moderate, and Transitional, the building was designed with intention at every step. The severe wing supports students recently discharged from clinical facilities. The moderate level reintroduces academic routines alongside therapy. Transitional spaces help students reintegrate into their original school environments while still receiving ongoing support.

    What makes the academy so revolutionary isn’t just its purpose; it’s the way it was designed.

    MOA didn’t start with a traditional floor plan. Instead, they spoke directly to students and imagined a ‘day in the life’ walking through the doors for the first time, possibly after a traumatic experience.

    “Children wouldn’t want to walk into a cold waiting room with fluorescent lights,” Vander Putten explains. “Imagine them walking into a space that feels like a coffee shop, greeted with warmth. You can go outside, take a walk, or have an art class. It’s about regaining control of their surroundings, choices, and future.”

    The design team deeply considered two kinds of trauma responses in children: internalizers, who may withdraw and self-harm, and externalizers, who act out physically. To accommodate both, spaces include everything from calming corners with natural light to punching bags, climbing walls, and color-coded wings that visually signal progression and achievement.

    Every material, color, and layout was researched through a trauma-informed lens. “There’s data behind everything,” says Vander Putten, whose background is in healthcare and trauma-responsive environments. “Even down to the wood tones on the walls. If it doesn’t reflect what you’d find in nature, it actually agitates the nervous system.”

    One of the most powerful aspects of the project is its reimagination of how these spaces should be. “We wanted students to walk in and think: They built this for me. They care about me,” Vander Putten says. “When kids feel respected by their space, they’re less likely to act out. They feel proud, and that matters.”

    The facility also allows students to move fluidly between different learning and therapy modalities. Some may be there for a few weeks, others for a few months.

    Since the academy opened, MOA has been speaking nationally about the project: at education conferences, AIA events, and within architecture circles. But now, the team wants to go further: they want to help other schools adapt these principles. “We know not every district can build a facility from scratch,” Vander Putten says. “But with thoughtful adaptive reuse, you can create refocus rooms, therapy zones, and transitional spaces within existing schools. You can make meaningful change without starting from the ground up.”

    Despite the project’s success, funding models remain a barrier. Medicare and Medicaid restrictions complicate public-private partnerships, and many schools struggle to secure investment. Cherry Creek’s effort required the district to hire its own clinicians, develop its own malpractice coverage, and operate independently of traditional hospital systems. Still, the success of Traverse Academy is proving what’s possible and urgently needed.

    As Vander Putten concludes, “We want to honor them by making sure this doesn’t stay a one-off. If we can help one more district, in our own way, help save one more child, that’s worth everything.”

    Source link

  • Internet Reacts To Trump’s Unproven Claim Linking Tylenol Use During Pregnancy To Autism

    Internet Reacts To Trump’s Unproven Claim Linking Tylenol Use During Pregnancy To Autism

    US President Donald Trump, joined by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., recently claimed that the use of Tylenol (acetaminophen) during pregnancy is linked to a rise in autism, urging women to avoid it unless absolutely necessary. He also suggested re-evaluating vaccine schedules in children. Medical experts and pregnancy health authorities immediately criticised the statements as lacking credible scientific support.

    Online, reactions have been intense and varied. On X/Twitter, many users expressed frustration and fear, saying the claims could cause undue worry among pregnant women. Memes have spread too — some exaggerated the scenario, others sarcastically comparing Tylenol to ‘superpowers’ lost if avoiding it. There are also posts sharing personal stories: parents debating whether their own use of painkillers might have played a role, even though they acknowledge they weren’t doctors. Meanwhile, groups such as the National Autistic Society condemned the claim, calling it ‘anti-science’ and warning against the spread of misinformation.










    Medical experts emphasise that decades of research, including large-scale Swedish and US studies, have found no causal link between acetaminophen use in pregnancy and autism. Makers of Tylenol, Kenvue, issued statements opposing Trump’s claim, citing the drug’s record of safety. Health regulators in the UK and elsewhere also reaffirmed that Tylenol remains among the safest options for treating pain and fever in pregnant women, when used correctly.

    Originally published on IBTimes UK



    Source link

  • Trump to Discuss New Autism Findings After Hinting At Major Discovery During Kirk Memorial

    Trump to Discuss New Autism Findings After Hinting At Major Discovery During Kirk Memorial

    At Charlie Kirk’s memorial, President Donald Trump veered off-script to reveal his administration had uncovered new findings on autism. He hinted that an upcoming public health briefing will examine possible links between acetaminophen, widely sold as Tylenol, and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

    Reports suggest Trump’s remarks may also extend to cautioning pregnant women about routine acetaminophen use, signalling a controversial shift in health guidance that could spark nationwide debate.

    Trump’s planned comments are expected to highlight leucovorin, a medication traditionally used for anaemia and certain cancer treatments, as a potential therapy aimed at improving communication skills in children with autism.

    The briefing will be attended by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, and CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz.

    Background: Tylenol and Autism Research

    The announcement arrives amid rising public concern about environmental and pharmaceutical factors contributing to autism. Tylenol, or acetaminophen, is widely used during pregnancy to reduce fever and manage pain.

    Some studies have suggested a possible association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and developmental disorders, though findings remain inconclusive.

    Autism diagnoses in the United States have increased over the last two decades. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that 1 in 31 American 8-year-olds are now diagnosed with autism, compared with 1 in 150 in 2000.

    The administration cited environmental toxins as a possible contributor, while many experts emphasise that improved diagnosis and greater awareness are likely key drivers of the rising numbers.

    Leucovorin Highlighted as Potential Autism Treatment

    In addition to cautioning against Tylenol, the White House is expected to focus on leucovorin as a potential treatment. Early research suggests that the drug may improve communication and cognitive function in some children with autism.

    Leucovorin is a derivative of folic acid and has traditionally been used to treat certain forms of anaemia and to counteract side effects from chemotherapy.

    Experts emphasise that the research on leucovorin remains preliminary. Clinical trials are ongoing, and scientists stress that results must be interpreted cautiously before the drug can be widely recommended as a standard treatment for autism.

    Medical Community Raises Concerns

    The proposed guidance has prompted concern among health professionals. Many doctors argue that current evidence does not support a definitive link between acetaminophen use in pregnancy and autism.

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics continue to consider acetaminophen safe when taken as directed.

    Kenvue, the manufacturer of Tylenol, released a statement asserting that there is no conclusive evidence linking acetaminophen to autism.

    Experts warn that public confusion over these claims could lead to unnecessary avoidance of the medication and potential health risks, particularly when fever management is critical during pregnancy.

    Implications for Public Health

    Trump’s announcement represents a notable shift in messaging around acetaminophen use during pregnancy. While the guidance is not legally binding, it could influence public behaviour, prenatal care practices, and media coverage.

    Healthcare providers are encouraged to discuss risks and benefits with their patients and to stay informed about ongoing research.

    Further studies on both acetaminophen exposure and potential autism treatments, including leucovorin, are expected to provide clearer guidance in the coming years. Regulatory agencies, including the FDA, are monitoring the situation closely to evaluate any policy adjustments.

    Originally published on IBTimes UK

    Source link