Health Journal Online

Tag: Scientists

  • Scientists Develop Nasal Spray That May Help Reverse Brain Aging

    Scientists Develop Nasal Spray That May Help Reverse Brain Aging

    Source: Science Daily

    Sometimes, the simplest approach may be the most effective. Scientists at Texas A&M University have developed an experimental nasal spray that could one day help reverse brain aging and restore memory. The promising research is raising hopes for future treatments targeting dementia and age-related cognitive decline.

    The study found that the nasal therapy produced significant and long-lasting effects after just two doses. According to the researchers, the treatment showed highly promising results in brain activity, including reduced inflammation in the brain, improved memory performance, and restored cellular energy systems associated with aging.

    The nasal therapy works by delivering microscopic particles known as extracellular vesicles through the nostrils and into the sinuses. This approach allows the particles to bypass the brain’s protective barrier and travel directly into brain tissue. The spray contains microRNAs—tiny molecules designed by scientists to help regulate genes and cellular activity. These particles specifically target chronic brain inflammation, a condition long associated with aging, dementia, and neurodegenerative disease.

    To provide background on persistent low-grade brain inflammation associated with aging, often referred to as neuroinflammaging, it is an inflammatory process within the brain and spinal cord, primarily driven by immune cells such as microglia and astrocytes. Over time, this process may gradually impair memory, learning, and cognitive flexibility.

    The nasal spray appears to work by reducing and suppressing inflammatory pathways linked to this process while also reviving mitochondrial activity—the energy-producing systems inside cells that tend to weaken with age.

    Beyond reducing neuroinflammaging, researchers said the treatment helped brain cells regain their “spark.” This effect was achieved by lowering oxidative stress and restoring energy production. Behavioral testing also showed significant improvements in memory and object recognition tasks compared with untreated subjects.

    The findings, published in the Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, add to growing scientific interest in whether certain aspects of aging can be slowed—or even partially reversed—at the cellular level. Other recent studies have explored ways to target aging-related inflammation, senescent cells, and metabolic dysfunction to improve long-term brain health.

    Researchers believe the approach could eventually have applications beyond normal aging, including conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, stroke recovery, and other disorders linked to cognitive decline. They also noted that the therapy produced similar effects across both sexes, something that remains relatively uncommon in biomedical research.

    Humankind has long sought ways to reverse aging, both of the mind and the brain. With the development of this nasal spray therapy—and, hopefully, with more in-depth research, further findings, and additional testing—researchers may have taken a step toward addressing this long-standing challenge. While aging has long been considered unavoidable, this medical breakthrough presents an intriguing possibility: brain aging may not be as irreversible as once believed.

    Source link

  • Scientists Discover Why Bread May Cause Weight Even Without More Calories

    Scientists Discover Why Bread May Cause Weight Even Without More Calories

    Bread is a staple food in many households, yet researchers continue to study how certain types may influence body weight. While calories remain important, some studies suggest that bread weight gain may also be linked to how refined carbohydrates affect blood sugar, hunger, and fat storage. This may explain why some people gain weight even when calorie intake appears unchanged.

    The type of bread eaten, portion size, and overall diet pattern all matter. White bread and other refined options digest quickly, while whole grain versions often contain more fiber and nutrients. Understanding why bread causes weight gain can help people make smarter choices without cutting out bread entirely.

    Bread Weight Gain: High Glycemic Index Metabolic Mechanisms

    Many refined breads are considered high glycemic index foods, meaning they can raise blood sugar quickly after eating. Rapid digestion causes glucose to enter the bloodstream fast, which may trigger a stronger insulin response. Insulin helps move sugar into cells, but frequent spikes may also encourage fat storage when repeated often.

    According to the British Journal of Nutrition, higher intake of white bread and refined grain products has been associated with increased risk of overweight and abdominal fat gain in some population studies. Researchers noted that refined grains may affect appetite control and long-term weight trends differently than whole grains.

    This helps explain why bread causes weight gain for some people more than others. Bread made with refined flour often has less fiber, which means it may not keep people full for long. That can lead to snacking later in the day and higher total calorie intake over time.

    Why Bread Causes Weight Gain: Insulin Resistance Development

    When refined bread is eaten frequently in large portions, the body may need to release insulin more often. Over time, cells can become less responsive, a process linked to insulin resistance mechanisms. When this happens, the body may store more energy as fat while blood sugar control becomes harder.

    Based on information from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, diets high in refined carbohydrates may increase risk factors tied to type 2 diabetes and weight gain, especially when fiber intake is low. Whole grains, in contrast, are associated with better metabolic health and improved blood sugar balance.

    This does not mean bread alone causes insulin resistance. Overall eating patterns, inactivity, sleep quality, genetics, and stress also matter. However, replacing frequent refined bread intake with higher-fiber foods may support healthier metabolism.

    Calories and Weight Gain: Satiety Signaling Bread Disruptions

    Many people focus only on calories and weight gain, but hunger and fullness signals also affect body weight. Foods that digest quickly may satisfy hunger at first, then leave people hungry again soon after. This can lead to larger portions at the next meal or extra snacks.

    According to Healthline, white bread is often lower in fiber and digests faster than whole grain bread, which may reduce fullness and increase the chance of overeating. Fiber slows digestion, helps stabilize blood sugar, and can improve satiety after meals.

    Refined carbohydrate metabolism may also play a role. Fast-digesting starches can create a quick rise and fall in blood sugar, sometimes followed by cravings. Choosing breads with seeds, whole grains, and higher fiber may help reduce this cycle.

    Better Bread Choices to Reduce Bread Weight Gain

    Choosing the right type of bread can make a difference when managing bread weight gain and improving overall nutrition. Small changes in bread selection may help control hunger, blood sugar, and daily calorie intake.

    • Choose Whole Grain Bread: Look for bread made with whole wheat, oats, rye, or other intact grains for more fiber and nutrients.
    • Check the Fiber Content: Pick options with at least 3 grams of fiber per slice to support fullness and digestion.
    • Limit Added Sugars: Some packaged breads contain extra sugar that may increase unnecessary calorie intake.
    • Watch Portion Sizes: Two slices may fit many meals, but oversized servings can add calories quickly.
    • Pair Bread With Protein: Add eggs, tuna, chicken, peanut butter, or Greek yogurt to help improve satiety.
    • Avoid Highly Processed Options: Ultra-soft refined breads often digest faster and may not keep you full long.
    • Read Ingredient Labels: Choose products with simple ingredients and whole grains listed first.
    • Rotate Carb Sources: Alternate bread with oats, brown rice, quinoa, or sweet potatoes for variety.

    Smart Ways to Enjoy Bread Without Weight Gain

    Bread does not need to be eliminated for healthy weight management. Portion size, bread type, and meal balance often matter more than bread itself. Choosing whole grain bread, pairing it with protein, and avoiding oversized portions can make a meaningful difference.

    If you are concerned about bread weight gain, look at your total eating pattern rather than one food alone. Replacing refined options with higher-fiber choices, staying active, and managing overall calorie intake can support long-term health while still allowing bread in moderation.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    1. Does bread automatically cause weight gain?

    No, bread does not automatically lead to weight gain. Weight changes usually depend on total calorie intake, food quality, and lifestyle habits. Some breads are more filling and nutritious than others. Portion size also matters.

    2. Why does white bread make me hungry quickly?

    White bread is often lower in fiber and digests faster than whole grain bread. This can cause blood sugar to rise and fall more quickly. Some people feel hungry again sooner after eating it. Pairing bread with protein or healthy fats may help.

    3. Is whole grain bread better for weight control?

    Whole grain bread often contains more fiber, vitamins, and minerals. Fiber can improve fullness and slow digestion. That may help with appetite control and steadier energy levels. It can be a better option for many people.

    4. Should I stop eating bread to lose weight?

    You do not always need to remove bread completely. Many people lose weight while still eating moderate portions of quality bread. Focus on overall diet balance and activity levels. Sustainable habits usually work better than strict elimination.



    Source link

  • ‘Change Dramatically’ or Fed Scientists Will Publish Elsewhere

    ‘Change Dramatically’ or Fed Scientists Will Publish Elsewhere

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. threatened leading medical journals during a podcast appearance Tuesday, warning that government scientists could be barred from publishing in what he called “corrupt” publications.

    During an appearance on the “Ultimate Human” podcast, Kennedy targeted the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and The Lancet, accusing them of publishing studies aligned with pharmaceutical industry interests.


    “Unless those journals change dramatically, we are going to stop NIH scientists from publishing in them and we’re going to create our own journals in-house,” Kennedy said, referencing the National Institutes of Health.

    Kennedy’s remarks follow the release of a White House-backed report he led, warning that pharmaceutical overreach, overprescribed medications, and institutional fear may be contributing to rising rates of chronic illness in children. The report claims industry influence has discouraged open scientific inquiry into underlying health issues.

    Kennedy went on to claim that even the editors of the publications agreed with him.

    He accused NEJM editor-in-chief Marcia Angell of saying, in Kennedy’s words, “‘We are no longer a science journal, we are a vessel for pharmaceutical propaganda.’” In 2009, Angell actually said: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published.”

    The former presidential candidate also took liberty paraphrasing a 2015 quote from Lancet editor, Richard Horton. “‘We are not longer science journals, we are about promoting pharmaceutical products and that is what we do,’” Kennedy claimed Horton said.

    “Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue,” Horton said, acknowledging that published research is, “Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest.”

    The journals cited by Kennedy have not yet offered a response to his comments.

    Meanwhile, NIH director, Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary have launched their own alternative journal, The Journal of the Academy of Public Health.

    Originally published on Latin Times



    Source link

  • New Chemical Identified In U.S. Tap Water, Scientists Urge Investigation Into Its Toxicity

    New Chemical Identified In U.S. Tap Water, Scientists Urge Investigation Into Its Toxicity

    Scientists have identified a new chemical byproduct in tap water consumed by millions of Americans, solving a decades-long mystery. This compound, formed during water purification with chloramine, raises health concerns for roughly 113 million people and warrants further investigation into its potential toxicity.

    Chloramine is a disinfectant created by combining chlorine with ammonia. It is preferred over chlorine in many water treatment systems due to its greater stability, which results in lower levels of disinfectant byproducts compared to chlorine.

    Although researchers first noted the unidentified chemical byproduct in tap water treated with chloramine nearly 40 years ago, its exact details were not known. In a recent study published in Science, scientists used advanced analytical methods to uncover its structure, which is now officially named chloronitramide anion.

    The researchers detected chloronitramide anion in all 40 samples taken from 10 drinking water systems located in seven states. It was not seen in ultrapure water, or drinking water treated without chlorine-based disinfectants.

    “It’s well recognized that when we disinfect drinking water, there is some toxicity that’s created. Chronic toxicity, really. A certain number of people may get cancer from drinking water over several decades. But we haven’t identified what chemicals are driving that toxicity. A major goal of our work is to identify these chemicals and the reaction pathways through which they form,” Julian Fairey, first co-author on the paper said in a news release.

    The study represents a significant breakthrough, as it successfully identified chloronitramide anion and determined its structure.

    “It’s a very stable chemical with a low molecular weight. It’s a very difficult chemical to find. The hardest part was identifying it and proving it was the structure we were saying it was,” Fairey noted.

    Although the toxicity of chloronitramide anion remains uncertain, researchers have raised concerns due to its widespread presence and structural similarities to other toxic compounds. They stress the need for further investigation by academics and regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    “Even if it is not toxic, finding it can help us understand the pathways for how other compounds are formed, including toxins. If we know how something is formed, we can potentially control it,” Fairey added.

    Source link