Review: Raise your hands if you Want Dad to Die !, Theatre5 03
503 Resets Raise your hands if you Want Dad to Die! is a title that from the off say to you so much about what you need to know. The assertion is that due to medical promotions, it is now possible to swap a terminal illness from one person to another. So that’s the dilemma facing the family; debating whether dad should sacrifice himself to save mum, who has just hours to live. It’s a great concept, extremely alongside the company’s goal statement of “producing nonsensical, political comedy which reflects on working class stories”. And to be fair, scattered throughout are …
Summary
Rating
40
Ok
A promising thought that at times shines, but where the promise is lost in the debris of too many aims at inexpensive laughs.
User Rating: Be the first one!
Raise Your Hand if you Want Dad to Die! is a title that from the off tells you so much better about what you need to know. The assertion is that due to medical advancements, it is now possible to swap a terminal illness from one person to another. So that’s the quagmire facing the family; debating whether dad should relinquish himself to save mum, which has recently hours to live.
It’s a great thought, especially alongside the company’s mission statement of “producing preposterous, political slapstick which reflects on working class stories”. And to be fair, sowed throughout are enough laugh out loud minutes to suggest there is a great show to be had here. But early on it becomes all too obvious that any huge show is currently hidden under too much baggage, as it tries to be too many things all at once. Merging political humor and satire is possible. Now, though, both elements are just too weak, too obvious, to really shine. What starts promisingly ends with relief that it is over. It is a real shame as there is plenty to affection if you can muddle through the excesses.
What this movement genuinely needed before it was unleashed upon an gathering is person brave enough to question some of its choices. It is beyond explanation as to why a performance taking aim at the government’s handling of the NHS decided what was also required was a questionable priest with room too many references to young sons, or a medical salesman for this new wonder treatment preparing jokes about the daughter’s breast size and having a penchant to stealing from pocketbooks. And let’s not even mention the dodgy Health Minister, fashioned without any apology on Matt Hancock, causing laughs about his affair with his advisor that have already aged seriously. Mostly, this frolic propels everything in the concoction and in doing so entirely loses focus on what it first set out to be.
And that is what is most frustrating; that there is clearly a great play buried in now somewhere. The perception alone should allow for plenty of screams and minutes of enlightenment about the value of life and what you would do if given the choice to die in place of someone you affection. When mum and dad, Paula and Nevin( Emma Richardson and Joshua Ford) have a moment alone to discuss the pros and cons of which of them should die, for a few minutes it is a wonderful and reflective gambling. There is discussion as to whether she has lived a full soul whilst he has consumed his away, and who would utter best exert of more years. In that single remove “youre seeing” what this play-act could, should, have been. It is then devastated immediately in the next background as their grown-up children, Roger and Tasha( James Georgiou and Rachelle Grubb) discuss how many times she got fingered by some chap. Certainly? Why? What is the point in such a scene? I have no problem with simple smut but here it really feels completely out of place.
I left Theatre5 03 so disappointed. There were pestering peeks of a real play trying hard to get out. But right now, we instead got a lot of screaming and shouting, dodgy clergymen and hackneyed jokes about Hancock having it away with his advisor. Working class fibs deserve better than this.
Written by: Clare O’FlahertyDirected by: Coral TarranProduced by: Maciek Zdobylak for Dad’s Not Dead Theatre Company
Raise Your Hand if you Want Dad to Die! toy for two nights as part of Theatre5 03′ s 503 Resets season.
In July 2020, Facebook announced they would contributed descriptions to announces from politicians “to protect the holding of elections and promote healthy civic engagement.”1 The names were supposed to identify content Facebook thought was inflammatory, misinformation or lies, without removing the post.
Why Facebook felt they should “moderate” free speech that was not incendiary or promoted cruelty is a question for another time. Harmonizing to left-leaning Media Matters for America, 2 while the media giant continues to use labels on poles, a study of Trump’s announces found that those “thats been” labeled as possible misinformation had significantly more interactions than those that were not labeled.
In other paroles, the labels appeared to engage more books. Facebook began researching a new label in July 2021. These descriptions don’t precisely distinguish possible “misinformation, ” but go any further to stimulate readers — asking if their friends are becoming radicals. 3 Historically, extreme minds have proven to advance society or lag it back into the Dark Ages. Consider 😛 TAGEND
Book burning by the Nazis to ensure the next generation did not providing access to anticipates contrary to Hitler4
The project that humans can fly, leading to the Wright brethren inventing the airplane
That energy could be controlled, with dreamers like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Edison working to find ways to have lamp in the dark
That the medical establishment didn’t entertain the idea of handwashing to stop the spread of disease until 20 years of data evidenced the practice lowered paces of infection5
The thread that runs through these extreme ideas is that censorship influences the style culture fantasizes and therefore changes the results of the. Had the German people been allowed to think for themselves, an part country may not have been swayed by the propaganda of one human. If the medical community were open to the idea that their behavior was killing people, they may have saved thousands.
Of course, there are extreme suggestions that should not be entertained. People will never is the possibility of fly without succour or walk into fire without defence. Yet, without censorship, these sentiments die a natural fatality. It’s simply through debate and sharing information that the truth winnings out. And the truth is the only foundation on which culture can realistically and confidently continue.
Facebook Labels Gardeners as Possible Activists
CNN reported that Facebook causes are being shown to some individuals, prudence them that they may know someone who is becoming an extremist. Other promptings are letting people know they’ve been exposed to extremist content. This is part of Facebook’s Redirect Initiative. 6 Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone told CNN: 7
“This test is part of our large work to assess ways to provide resources and support to beings on Facebook who may have engaged with or were exposed to extremist content or may know someone who is at risk. We are partnering with NGOs and academic experts in this space and hope to have more to share in the future.”
In the past, Facebook has been criticized for not acting on content that encourages people toward brutality. Yet, these admonishes are also attached to berths sharing information about apparently innocuous topics, like buying nutrient. Harmonizing to CNET :8
“One of the notifies, shared on Twitter, asks:’ Are you concerned that someone you know is becoming an extremist? We care about preventing extremism on Facebook. Others in your statu has come forward with confidential support.’
Another alert speaks:’ Violent groups try to manipulate your indignation and disappointment. You can take action now to protect yourself and others.’”
As an likenes saved on archive.is from Reddit establishes, 9 Facebook is labeling those selling home-grown beef as “too prepared.” Compare the extremist contemplates of preparedness to the Forbes1 0 report August 17, 2021, that the Taliban would have control of the Afghan social media accounts.
However, it doesn’t stop there. Twitter affixes are reporting screenshots of canning and gardening radicals that are also being asked, “Are you concerned that someone you know is too prepared? We care about frustrating extremism on Facebook. Others in your place has come forward with confidential support.”
In other oaths, Facebook is labeling people who are preparing their food supply as potential fanatics, but in August 2021, the social monster was fine with activist radicals like the Taliban taking over Afghan social media histories. 11 Twenty-four hours later, though, Reuters1 2 reported Facebook had a ban on the Taliban posting on the social media stage. According to vice president of content policy Monika Bickert: 13
“They will not be allowed while they are prescribed by the U.S. law and even if they were not prescribed by U.S. ordinance, we would have to do a plan analysis on whether or not they nevertheless violate our hazardous organisations policy.”
Bickert is referring to the fact that the U.S. has soft-pedaled their posture on the group as they are not on the U.S. State Department’s list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. 14 Since the U.S. had not been able to classified them as gunmen, they can enter negotiations1 5 with working group whose wars historically have been less than trustworthy. 16,17, 18
Facebook’s definition of militant plans apparently conforms to the doctrines of the World Economic Forum( WEF ), of which Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder and CEO of Facebook, is a part of that. 19
For example, while some consider a guaranteed basic income paid by the government to all citizens as progressive and dystopian, according to a charismatic appearance Zuckerberg made during a inauguration addres at Harvard, 20 moving the financial scaffold “of the worlds” to universal basic income is not an extremist move.
Instead, it’s something to be explored and researched. As reported by the WEF, Zuckerberg explained that “too few people had the opportunity to try out new ideas — like house his world-conquering platform.”2 1 This is in line with the WEF’s mission to reinvent the future2 2 by resetting the global fiscal platform. 23
Facebook Act Called to Question in Early 2019
In late 2018, PBS’s “Frontline” liberated a two-part film announced “The Facebook Dilemma, ”2 4,25 in which James Jacoby probed the affected by the social media beings had over the democracy of commonwealths, and the lack of privacy parameters that allowed for tens of millions of users’ data to be siphoned and used to influence U.S. elections.
During 2019 Bloomberg2 6 reported Facebook was taping flecks of audio the government has recorded from users’ telephones. This explained how many were realizing targeted ads after just speaks with a product or service out loud. Further research exposed even more disturbingly, Android apps were taking screen shots of your smartphone and sending the information to third parties. 27
According to The Guardian, 28 in 2018 Facebook had 40 correspondents who worked as information checkers pinpointed across the globe. They were split in their opinion about their fact-checking relationship with Facebook. The Guardian mentioned one who said: 29
“Why should we trust Facebook when it’s drive the same rumors that its own fact checkers are calling fake news? It’s worth asking how do they consider narratives about George Soros on the platform knowing they exclusively compensate parties to try to link political enemies to him? Working with Facebook procreates us look bad.”
Some writers spoke with a reporter from The Guardian, who said they told him, 30 “Facebook’s hiring of a PR firm that used an antisemitic narrative to repudiate reviewers — fueling the same kind of propaganda fact checkers regularly debunk — should be a deal-breaker.”
The accusations into Facebook’s PR pleasures came after the European Parliament called for a privacy scrutiny when it was revealed that Facebook let Cambridge Analytica to misuse 87 million users’ data to influence election results. 31 The infraction penalty Facebook a mere $643,000 for the role it played, which they paid to the U.K.’s Information Commissioner’s office.
Facebook’s reported revenue for the first fourth in 2021 was $26.17 billion, up 48%, due in part from higher-priced advertising. 32 Although the fine was a drop in the barrel when compared against Facebook’s revenue, it was the maximum possible penalty that could be imposed under the Data Protection Act 1998. Under the new laws transferred in 2018, the maximum penalize have had an opportunity to $22 million. 33
The reporter from The Guardian wrote that one of the fact checkers, Brooke Binkowski, shared how Facebook affected the performance of their duties, sometimes to protect their advertisers, writing: 34
“ … it appeared that Facebook was pushing reporters to prioritize debunking misinformation that affected Facebook advertisers, which she contemplated swept a line: ‘You’re not doing journalism any more. You’re doing propaganda.’”
This is inline with current activities, since extremist content that shares preparedness, self-reliance, and evidence-based data about viral spread, masking or shot planneds may have an impact on the push towards the “Great Reset.”
Facebook’s Prepandemic Campaign Against Vaccine Information
Facebook’s campaign against parties sharing information about vaccination platforms had grown in strength even before the COVID-1 9 genetic rehabilitation shot planned. As I reported in early 2019, it was likely driven to protect the interests of their pharmaceutical advertisers. 35,36, 37
While many accept vaccination programs are not advantageous, consider Pfizer’s Prevnar 13 inoculation, which is supposed to protect against common sprains of pneumonia and performed three times more money than Viagra in 2015.38
The rising benefits from Prevnar 13 in 2015 were thanks to the U.S. government’s recommendation to start using it in adults over 65, and not only in children. 39 As noted in the Financial Times, 40 “ … the success of Prevnar demonstrates[ vaccines] can be as profitable as any drug.” So, if you have forums on Facebook sharing true experiences about vaccine side effects, you can see why Pfizer wouldn’t want those notes left there.
When you have a profitable business, you want to promote sustained growth. This wants fostering and protecting your products and services. That’s regular in the world of business. What is not normal is procuring the government to mandate the use of your product while simultaneously thwarting sharing bad reviews that impact auctions or action you to improve the safety or effectiveness of the product.
So, what was happening in the vaccine manufacture before 2020 has continued during the pandemic. The pushing to censor negative press about inoculations on Facebook has been outright shocking. The reason is that “misinformation” thwarts beings from manufacturing voice medical decisions.
It’s the same justification being used by Facebook to name any information about the COVID vaccine4 1 as fallaciou or admonishes beings embed their own plots against “extremist judges, ” while provide “confidential support.”4 2
Government Asking Social Media to Ban Research
Christina Parks, Ph.D ., has her measure in cellular and molecular biology. In this short video she vouches before the Michigan House on Bill 4471, which seeks to prohibit vaccinations as a condition of employment in Michigan. You likely have read or heard the information she shares about COVID, influenza and DTap vaccines if you’ve been reading my newsletter.
Yet, the science she’s quoting is the terribly information that Facebook, and the U.S. authority would like to ban from social media places. To control and influence your demeanor, it is essential that you do not understand the social sciences behind viral pathogens and the vaccines that hope to control those infections — and that intends stopping you from learning technical truths by any means possible.
July 16, 2021, during a White House briefing4 3 press secretary Jen Psaki admitted that the Biden Administration is alerting social media companies to posts and accounts that the White House believes is peddling “misinformation” about COVID insertions. This is illegal and a violation of First Amendment liberties. During the brief she quoth the “Disinformation Dozen” report released by the Center for Countering Digital Hate( CCDH ). 44,45
The report claims that 65% of anti-vaccine content on Facebook and Twitter comes from 12 individuals, including me. After this “disinformation” report was virally spread, the truth was indicates that there is an August 18, 2021, report from Bickert at Facebook, placing the record straight, and in the process razed the CCDH’s claims. The report discovered: 46
“In fact, these 12 parties are responsible for about merely 0.05% of all beliefs of vaccine-related content on Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related berths they’ve shared, whether true-life or fictitiou, as well as URLs associated with these people.”
As the likenes on Reddit4 7 aptly expresses, Facebook now promotes the idea that stretching meat and buying nutrient from farmers may determine you “too prepared.” They will warn your friends they have been exposed to extremist ideas and can receive confidential support to ensure they don’t follow suit.
The 36-year-old model has been sharing her views on the pandemic on her Instagram, and addressed her thoughts in a brand new post this week.
“The past few months have been very peaceful without social media:)” Doutzen started off. “A part of me wanted to escape into my family bubble and leave everything up to faith. That part of me believes in the power of consciousness, that whatever you give energy to will grow.”
She adds, “So I tried to ignore the negative and focus on the positive. But at this point I can no longer turn a blind eye to the injustice that is happening right in front of us.”
Click inside to read more of Doutzen’s reasons she will not take the vaccine…
Continuing on her post, Doutzen says that “Other people have given me hope and strength with their courage to stand up for our rights. They touched my heart and inspired me to do the same. So although my hands are shaking while writing this, I feel it is time to choose courage over comfort and speak my truth:
“I will not be forced to take the shot. I will not be forced to prove my health to participate in society. I will not accept exclusion of people based on their medical status.”
She adds, “Freedom of speech is a right worth fighting for but we can only solve this united in peace and love! Pass on the torch of hope and love and speak your truth. ❤️”
Doutzen isn’t alone in her thoughts aout the vaccine, as several other stars have stated they won’t take it either.
With many parents lives here in households where both spouses work outside the dwelling, child care has become a significant portion of numerous funds. While nothing wants to leave their children in the care of the absolute lowest provider, many people are looking for ways to save money on child care expenditures. Now got a few spoofs to consider if you’re looking for ways to save money on childcare.
Use Dependent Care FSA
One of the best child care hacks is a dependent care adaptable spending account( FSA ). A relative maintenance FSA is reminiscent of a Health Savings Account. Both are accounts that are typically offered as employee benefits. A Dependent Care FSA allows you to take out money from each paycheck and not have to pay taxes on it.
You can then use that fund to pay for child care throughout the year. A wide variety of different types of childcare are eligible to be paid for with DCFSA funds, so make sure to check the rules and regulations of your history. By paying for your childcare expenses with pre-tax dollars, you’re getting a saving of 20 -3 0% or more as compared to paying with after-tax money.
One other thing that you’ll want to be aware of with a Dependent Care FSA is that countless histories are” apply it or lose it” each year. So you’ll is intended to be conservative with how much fund that you put into the account, and make sure that you use all of your stores each calendar year.
Design From Home Or Adjust Your Schedule
Another possible child care hack involves how adaptable you are eligible to establish your schedule. Of trend this will depend on your specific employer and job situation, but if you have flexibility with your planned, it’s possible that you can arrange things to save on childcare. This is especially true if your marriage or collaborator also has a resilient schedule.
It’s unlikely that you’ll be able to adjust your planned so that you can both work full-time at home and take care of children full-time, extremely if your children are younger. Clearly, that will mean that both your work and home live are likely to suffer. But you may be able to arrange things so that you can trade off with your spouse to reduce the amount of daylights/ hours that it is necessary to childcare.
One idea might be to trade off epoches where you are working from dwelling vs. is in accordance with the office. Or, if you have flexibility with your workable hours, you might work early in the morning with your marriage doing child care in the mornings to trade off last-minute in the working day. Experiment with different options to see if any of these options work well for their own families. Even one day a week where you can save on childcare represents a 20% savings.
Consider a Nanny Share
If you’re more interested in working with a nanny but feel like it’s too expensive a nanny share could be a great option for their own families. Sharing a nanny with neighbours or friends can be a good way to take advantage of the benefits of having a nanny including a more flexible schedule and more one-on-one attention for your child while also cutting cost.
Examination For Family And Friends
Another option is to look for family and friends that might be able to help out. If grandparents live in the area, they could be an option, either as full-time caregivers or as part of your overall childcare strategy. Again, this is something where being able to be a little flexible can help out. Another option to look into might be doing a bartering grouping with another family where you exchange childcare for another service.
Is It Worth It?
Finally, take a look at your budget and see if going to a one-income household is at all feasible for your unique place. Of course, in many situations it will not be, but there are hidden expenditures to the two-income life that you might not be thinking about. If you are in a household situation where one partner performs significantly more than the other, there is an opportunity make sense to have the second largest spouse stay at home.
Of course, you’ll almost completely eliminate your childcare overheads if one collaborator stands at home, but with person at home full-time, you may also drastically reduce your meat fund. Having someone at home likely means that you’ll be able to shop more carefully and eat out less.
Taxes are another large-scale expense that you can reduce by descending to one income. With a second income , is not simply are you paying taxes on your income, but by fostering the total household income, you’re likely being bumped up to a higher tax bracket overall. It are no longer able be possible, but if there is interest in having one spouse stay at home, passed the numbers and see if it realizes ability for you.
The Bottom Line
For households, childcare is one of the largest expenses of your household plan. But if you’re adaptable and think outside of the box a bit, you can save some of those costs. If your employer offers it, look at a Dependent Care Flexible Spending Account to pay some of your child care expenses with pre-tax dollars. And if you have a job where you work from dwelling sometimes, see if you can arrange your schedule to help cut down on childcare costs.
After the recent warmer weather and time of greater freedom, it could be easy to think the pandemic is behind us. London currently has the lowest COVID-1 9 case rate of any region in England but beings are coming back together for autumn with the return of institutions, universities and workplaces.
While levels of transmission of the coronavirus remains high overall, it’s time for us to be vigilant and ensure we are fully prepared for potentially challenging months ahead. Coronavirus controls in place last year meant that many of the usual winter viruses such as flu , norovirus and RSV were repressed, so we’re preparing for an changeable winter with many more respiratory and seasonal illness circulating.
COVID-1 9 inoculations save lives
Vaccines remain the most powerful and effective tool against severe disease and death from COVID-1 9, and have proven to be effective against many of the brand-new variants of the virus that have emerged over the past year. A key part of preparing for the upcoming winter season is ensuring we continue to increase population coverage and uptake of vaccines, and the most recent proclamations about the booster programme and vaccine offer to 12-15 year olds are welcome.
Although we have made great progress with flattening out the inoculation program in London, “were having” further to go to ensure we have high levels of uptake in all age cohorts, communities and areas of the city. London, like other large metropolitan areas with younger, more diverse, disadvantaged and mobile people, generally has lower uptake of childhood and adult vaccines compared to other regions, and it’s been no different for the COVID-1 9 inoculations. Across the UK over 80% of beings aged 16 and over are fully vaccinated compared to time 60% in London.
Because of the somewhat mingled picture of vaccine uptake across the city, protection from the severe disease and death caused by the virus this winter is likely to be uneven. The data on vaccination is clear; simply 1.2% of deaths involving COVID-1 9 between January and July this year occurred in people who received both dosages of the inoculation. Although occurrence frequencies in London have been stable in recent weeks, the average number of daily illness is ten times higher than this time last year. We are therefore coming into winter from a higher baseline and strengthening our vaccine coverage throughout the city is essential as it will be our strongest cable of defence.
Addressing inoculation hesitancy
We know that the difference in mortality risk between ethnic groups can primarily are attributable to demographic, geographical and socioeconomic factors, often further aggravated by restriction trust and engagement with public health services, poor access to healthcare and lower confidence in the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine due to commonly held superstitions and misinformation. This is why we continue our commitment to working with London’s communities to provide reliable and accessible information about health and vaccines throughout the said period, ensuring that every Londoner can make an informed choice and freely access the vaccine, protecting all our communities and leaving none behind.
We now have the research, suffer and tools to ensure the vaccine is delivered safely to all who need it. From early in the pandemic, we have listened to our communities to understand how and where they like to access information. Taking a united approach with our partners in London to share information regularly has been vital. Over the summer, we worked collectively with young Londoners, the NHS and the Mayor of London’s team at the Greater London Authority to understand the barriers to 20 -2 5 year olds in the capital getting their COVID-1 9 inoculation and how to overcome them.
Young adults shared that they wanted to have open and honest exchanges to help shape their decision, but away from vaccine cores, and in creative spaces with likeminded people. Together we co-designed the “London, You Good? ” project and patronized over 30 regional community organisations in more than 20 districts to host phenomena through music, boast, film, dance and additional activities. This brought together young Londoners from across the city so they could have their questions on the vaccine refuted and an environment to discuss the significant impact of the pandemic on their lives and the effect on their mental health.
Keep on going injected, London
Every day, uptake of the COVID vaccine continues to increase as thousands of Londoners get their jabs at GP rules, vaccination centres, regional society pharmacies and inoculation outreach centres. However, we still have a long way to go if we are to achieve high inoculation coverage in all corners of the city and all eligible age group. It has been an immense effort so far by everyone involved but the rate of uptake has retarded, and frequencies are specially low-spirited among young men from economically disadvantaged parishes, and Black Caribbean and Black African young men from all backgrounds. We need Londoners to continue with the effort- get injected, taking up the booster jab if eligible, and encouraging young people to get vaccinated too.
Stay safe this winter
It is important to remember that the direction of the pandemic are subject to change instantly with emerging winter press and that is why brand-new counseling such as the government’s Winter Plan and the Chief Medical Officers’ recommendation to extend vaccination to all 12 -1 5 year olds, aim to keep pace, so we can keep on top of the pandemic. Rising charges could require a return to more stringent measures including compulsory mask wearing, succeeding from home and vaccine certification. The wander to recovery is going to be a marathon , not a sprint, and regrettably this is not an issue that will disappear overnight.
So, as we are moving forward through autumn and into wintertime, we’re still advising people to stay cautious and to keep up to date with the most recent developments and information. Continue wearing face extends in crowded the regions and on public transport, ventilate indoor neighbourhoods, assessment yourself twice a few weeks with lateral flow maneuvers, and get a PCR test and stay at home “if youre having” symptoms.
If you haven’t more had your vaccine or second dosage, please come forward as soon as possible so London has the best protection and possibility of retaining live leading safely this wintertime. Give yourself and those you adoration the best protection against the most devastating impacts of this infection. The vaccine present remains open for everyone eligible and there’s no such thing as a missed hazard, so if you’ve left it a while it’s not too late! Book your inoculation appointment today or find a walk-in vaccination site.
