For years, the national conversation around America’s physician shortage has focused on expansion. More medical school seats. More residency slots. A larger training pipeline. Yet increasing volume alone has not translated into equitable access to care.
The deeper issue may not be how many physicians the country trains, but where they ultimately choose to practice and whether they remain there.
The Association of American Medical Colleges projects a shortage of up to 86,000 physicians by 2036. As of September 2024, nearly two-thirds of primary care Health Professional Shortage Areas were concentrated in rural communities. The challenge is not only supply. It is distribution and retention.
Without structural intervention, expanding training capacity risks reinforcing existing geographic imbalances.
Residents Medical Center of Graduate Medical Excellence, known as RM GME, was built around that premise.
Reframing Workforce Strategy
RM GME develops and sponsors graduate medical education programs in partnership with hospitals and healthcare systems, with a strategic focus on rural and safety-net institutions. In 2024, the organization achieved accreditation as an ACGME sponsoring institution, allowing it to oversee residency programs under its own institutional framework.
“We recently became an ACGME-accredited sponsoring institution. Our first independently sponsored residency program launches in California, and our intention is to replicate that model in underserved markets nationwide — Dr. Michael Everest, founder of RM GME.
The organization positions itself not as a placement intermediary, but as a graduate medical education infrastructure model designed to align training with long-term community workforce needs.
The Overlooked Variable: Residency Churn
A persistent but under-addressed dynamic in healthcare workforce policy is residency churn. Physicians frequently train in underserved environments, only to relocate to larger metropolitan systems after graduation. Hospitals that invested in their development face renewed shortages. Communities lose continuity of care.
Research published in Health Affairs and the Journal of Rural Health has consistently shown that physicians are more likely to practice in the type of community where they complete their residency. Training location influences practice location. Yet many residency programs remain concentrated in already saturated urban centers.
“Workforce stability begins during training. If we want physicians to practice in underserved communities long term, we have to build programs that are rooted in those communities from the outset. — Dr. Everest”
RM GME-supported programs emphasize continuity through a guiding principle of post-training community engagement. Residents are encouraged to continue practicing in the same region for a period of at least three years following graduation, reflecting the program’s long-term community investment philosophy.
“This is not about coercion or compliance. It reflects institutional values and strategic intent. When a community invests in training physicians, the goal is lasting impact. — Dr. Everest”
Rather than relying on contractual retention mechanisms, the model focuses on designing programs where long-term practice aligns naturally with professional growth and community integration.
Infrastructure That Supports Sustainability
Retention is not secured by philosophy alone. Physicians training in rural and safety-net settings often operate with fewer academic resources than their counterparts in large academic medical centers. To address this gap, RM GME integrates AI-supported educational tools that provide adaptive knowledge assessment, conversational academic support, and personalized exam preparation.
For residents balancing demanding clinical schedules, structured academic reinforcement can influence confidence, performance, and long-term professional satisfaction. In RM GME’s framework, educational infrastructure is part of the workforce strategy.
If physicians feel supported during training, the likelihood of sustained engagement increases.
A Model That Tests a Larger Hypothesis
Loan forgiveness initiatives and financial incentives have attempted to address geographic disparities for decades. While they have produced incremental improvements, rural shortages persist.
RM GME’s approach tests a different hypothesis. Durable workforce reform may depend on embedding graduate medical education directly within underserved communities and aligning institutional design with continuity from the beginning.
“Our focus is long-term workforce alignment. Training physicians is essential. Ensuring they remain where they are most needed is what ultimately determines impact. — Dr. Everest”
If the physician shortage is fundamentally a distribution crisis, the future of workforce reform may depend less on expanding seats and more on rethinking where those seats are placed.
As RM GME scales its ACGME-accredited sponsorship model, its community-rooted approach will serve as a case study in whether structural GME design can influence where America’s physicians choose to build their careers.
