Tag: reports

  • New York City Reports First Severe Mpox Clade I Case — A More Dangerous Strain Now Showing Up Across America

    New York City Reports First Severe Mpox Clade I Case — A More Dangerous Strain Now Showing Up Across America

    New York City has confirmed its first case of mpox caused by clade I — the more dangerous variant of the virus — raising concern among public health officials as the more infectious and more severe form of mpox continues to arrive in major U.S. cities. The NYC Health Department issued a formal advisory noting that there is no known local community transmission tied to this case, but health commissioner Dr. Alister Martin confirmed the virus is now present in the city and urged residents to be aware of symptoms and vaccination options.

    As of May 9, 2026, the NYC Department of Health reported 79 mpox cases in New York City in 2026 alone, including at least a small number of clade I cases. Nationally, the CDC confirmed more than 20 clade I mpox cases in the United States as of June 2026, all linked to recent international travel or contact with travelers from affected regions in Central and Eastern Africa or Western Europe.

    Clade I vs. Clade II: Why This Strain Is More Concerning

    Most Americans became familiar with mpox during the 2022 global outbreak, which was caused by clade II — a less severe form of the virus with a survival rate above 99.9%. Clade I is different. According to Fox News senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel, “Clade I causes more severe symptoms and can be life-threatening.” In the ongoing outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, clade I has had a case fatality rate significantly higher than clade II. Complications can include severe skin lesions, pneumonia, brain inflammation, and bacterial superinfections.

    While clade I spreads through the same routes as clade II — primarily close physical contact, sexual contact, kissing, and contact with infected skin lesions or respiratory droplets at close range — it does not spread through casual airborne contact over long distances. The CDC has assessed the current risk to the general U.S. population as low, but characterizes the risk as low to moderate for men who have sex with men, who accounted for the majority of the 2022 U.S. outbreak.

    Who Should Get Vaccinated and What to Watch For

    The JYNNEOS vaccine, approved for mpox prevention, provides strong protection against both clade I and clade II. The CDC recommends the two-dose vaccine series for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men aged 18 and older with specific risk factors. Anyone who traveled to or had contact with someone from the DRC, neighboring African countries, or parts of Western Europe reporting clade I cases should consult their healthcare provider immediately.

    Symptoms of mpox typically appear 3 to 17 days after exposure and begin with fever, swollen lymph nodes, muscle aches, and exhaustion, followed by a distinctive rash that progresses through several stages of fluid-filled lesions. Anyone with a new or unexplained rash — particularly after recent travel or close physical contact — should contact a healthcare provider, mention any travel history, and avoid close contact with others until evaluated. NYC offers free mpox vaccination at multiple locations across the five boroughs.

    The arrival of clade I mpox in New York City — the nation’s most densely populated metro area — is a reminder that the city’s international connectivity, while a source of enormous economic and cultural vitality, also serves as an entry point for emerging infectious diseases. Whether the public health infrastructure put in place after 2022 remains fully operational under reduced federal staffing is a question officials have not fully answered.

    Source link

  • Penn Medicine Reports 30% Drop in Breast Cancer Risk with Ozempic and Wegovy

    Penn Medicine Reports 30% Drop in Breast Cancer Risk with Ozempic and Wegovy

    A landmark study published June 2, 2026, in JCO Oncology Practice and simultaneously presented at the 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine has produced findings that could reshape how America’s medical community thinks about GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs and how millions of women with obesity approach their own cancer risk.

    The study, led by Dr. Elizabeth McDonald, a professor of radiology at Penn and practicing breast radiologist at Penn’s Abramson Cancer Center, found that women using GLP-1 medications were approximately 30% less likely to develop breast cancer than women who were not taking these drugs. The finding comes from an analysis of 111,646 women, the largest study of its kind, and the protective effect held even after rigorous statistical matching to control for confounding factors.

    The scale and rigor of the Penn Medicine study are what elevate it above prior observational work in this area. Researchers used electronic health records from the University of Pennsylvania Health System, which includes both academic and community medical sites across Pennsylvania and New Jersey, to identify women aged 45 to 80 with a BMI of 25 or above who had undergone breast imaging between January 2022 and June 2025.

    Of the 111,646 women in the full cohort, 15,264 (13.7%) had documented GLP-1 medication prescriptions, and 96,382 (86.3%) had no documented GLP-1 exposure. The researchers examined cancer incidence in both the full cohort and a matched cohort of 30,528 women, pairing each GLP-1 user one-to-one with a control patient matched on age, race, ethnicity, BMI, breast density, and diabetes status.

    The result: 35.1% lower odds of breast cancer in the full analysis; 30.5% lower odds in the rigorously matched cohort.

    Why the 30% Reduction Is Scientifically Credible

    The breast cancer finding is consistent with what GLP-1 drugs do biologically. GLP-1 receptor agonists, the drug class that includes Ozempic (semaglutide), Wegovy (semaglutide), Mounjaro (tirzepatide), and Zepbound (tirzepatide), produce significant weight loss and improve key metabolic measures such as insulin sensitivity, inflammation levels, and sex hormone balance. Each of these changes is independently linked to lower breast cancer risk through well-established biological pathways.

    Body fat is not just storage tissue; it is hormonally active. It converts androgens into estrogens through a process called aromatization. In postmenopausal women who are overweight or obese, fat tissue becomes the main source of circulating estrogen. Most breast cancers, about 70 to 75 percent, are estrogen receptor-positive, meaning they grow in response to estrogen. When weight is reduced, fat tissue decreases, aromatization declines, estrogen levels drop, and the growth stimulus for these cancers is reduced. This mechanism is widely accepted and helps explain why obesity increases breast cancer risk and why weight loss lowers it.

    GLP-1 drugs also reduce chronic low-grade inflammation, measured through markers such as CRP, which can contribute to a tumor-friendly environment. In addition, they improve insulin resistance, lowering levels of insulin and IGF-1, both of which have been shown to directly promote breast cancer cell growth.

    “While our study was observational and does not definitively confirm an association,” Dr. McDonald said, “it does add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that it’s worth investigating these weight-loss drugs as potential cancer prevention tools.”

    The Philadelphia Context: Penn Medicine, Penn’s Abramson Center, and What This Means Locally

    The Penn Medicine research carries particular significance in Philadelphia, where the study was conducted. The Penn Abramson Cancer Center, consistently ranked among the top cancer hospitals in the United States, is home to a major breast imaging and breast oncology program. The health system spans Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and the electronic health records used in the study reflect a real-world patient population in the greater Philadelphia region, including a wide range of body weight profiles, cancer risk factors, and GLP-1 prescribing patterns.

    Philadelphia County has a breast cancer incidence rate above the national average, driven in part by higher obesity rates among women, especially in lower-income areas of North, West, and South Philadelphia. If GLP-1 drugs reduce breast cancer risk by 30% in overweight and obese women, the same group that accounts for much of the county’s burden, the public health impact could be significant. Access becomes the key issue. The women most likely to benefit are also those most likely to face insurance and cost barriers to GLP-1 treatment.

    What Women Should Discuss with Their Doctors Now

    The Penn Medicine study is observational — it does not prove causality and does not constitute a clinical recommendation to prescribe GLP-1 drugs for breast cancer prevention. Breast cancer prevention currently relies on lifestyle modification, screening adherence, chemoprevention with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors for high-risk individuals, and prophylactic surgical options for those with BRCA mutations.

    What the study does justify is a conversation: women aged 45 to 80 who are overweight or obese, who are considering GLP-1 therapy for obesity or diabetes management, should ask their provider whether the breast cancer risk data adds weight to the clinical rationale for their treatment. For women who are already on GLP-1 medications, this study provides additional scientific support for the value of continued treatment. For oncologists, this data adds a new dimension to the patient conversation about weight management as cancer prevention — one with a specific drug class and a quantified risk reduction.

    Source link

  • Influencer Urges Parents to Give Kids Bleach to Treat Autism Despite Reports of Vomiting, Suffering Seizures: Report

    Influencer Urges Parents to Give Kids Bleach to Treat Autism Despite Reports of Vomiting, Suffering Seizures: Report

    A social media influencer is under fire for promoting a dangerous and discredited chemical as a so-called “autism cure,” despite alarming reports of serious harm to children.

    Kerri Rivera, who has over 17,000 followers on Instagram, encourages parents to administer chlorine dioxide (CD)—an industrial bleach used in textile manufacturing and disinfection—orally and by enema to their autistic children. Rivera falsely claims this “protocol” rids the body of parasites she believes cause autism.

    Messages from Rivera’s private support group show parents reporting disturbing side effects, including vomiting, rashes, seizures, and chemical-smelling urine. Despite these symptoms, Rivera routinely reassures followers that these are signs the bleach is “working” and the body is “detoxifying.”

    Ingesting chlorine dioxide can result in severe vomiting, liver failure, respiratory problems, developmental delays and death.

    Tim Nicholls of the National Autistic Society called Rivera’s claims “sickening.”

    “This information is wrong, dangerous and harmful to autistic people and their families,” Nicholls told The Independent.

    “No autistic person, parent or carer should be told to ‘cure’ their child by administering a dangerous, potentially life-threatening chemical,” he continued. “Autism is a lifelong neurodivergence and disability, it is not a disease that can be ‘treated’ or ‘cured.’”

    TikTok has removed Rivera’s account, and Amazon removed her storefront where she earned commission on products she recommended to administer “protocols.” Her Instagram remains active.

    Advocacy groups are urging social media platforms and government agencies to take stronger action against the promotion of toxic treatments and to encourage parents to seek advice from trusted medical professionals.

    Rivera has not responded to the growing backlash.

    Originally published on Latin Times



    Source link

  • Indiana Doctors Go To Court To Keep Terminated Pregnancy Reports From Being Released To The Public

    Indiana Doctors Go To Court To Keep Terminated Pregnancy Reports From Being Released To The Public

    Two abortion providers in Indiana advocating against the release of individual terminated pregnancy reports have taken the matter to court, filing a lawsuit in Marion County to keep the records private.

    Licensed OB-GYN physicians Caitlin Bernard and Caroline Rouse filed the suit to prevent the Indiana Department of Health from releasing documents relating to terminated pregnancies under Indiana’s Access to Public Records Act, stating that such records are exempt and do not have to be divulged, Inside Indiana Business reported.

    If released, the reports would not reveal the names of the patients who terminated pregnancies, but would include other personal information such as age, race and county of residence. The reports would also list the name of the physician who performed the abortion.

    “We are once again in court defending our patients and their right to privacy,” Bernard and Rouse said in a joint statement, as reported by The Hill.

    “Everyone receiving medical care deserves to have their personal health decisions and pregnancy outcomes protected. There is no reason to release this sensitive information to the public. We will keep fighting to protect patients’ privacy and the trust between doctors and patients,” they continued.

    Bernard gained national attention after speaking out about a patient who she had helped to receive an abortion in 2022: a 10-year-old girl from Ohio who had reportedly been sexually assaulted.

    The Indiana Department of Health stopped releasing individual reports of terminated pregnancies following the state’s implementation of a near-total abortion ban, continuing only to release aggregate reports of terminated pregnancies within the state.

    From July to September of 2023, the IDOH reported 764 abortions. Only 17 of these were performed after August when abortion bans took effect. The agency then addressed concerns that identifying reports could be “reverse-engineered” to identify patients who terminated pregnancies due to the small number of abortions being carried out within the state.

    “Given that the report is populated with information that could be reverse engineered to identify patients — especially in smaller communities — (IDOH argues) that the required quarterly reports should suffice in terms of satisfying any disclosure and transparency considerations,” the December informal opinion from Public Access Counselor Luke Britt said.

    Pro-life advocacy group Voices for Life continued to sue the state of Indiana, demanding the release of individual reports. Voices for Life further stated it would file an appeal after the case was dismissed by a Marion County judge in 2024. However, in January 2025, Indiana’s newly elected Republican Governor, Mike Braun, demanded that the reports be publicized through executive order.

    IDOH, which settled and agreed to publicize the records, stated that they would make redactions to the reports that “adequately protect personal health identifiers and that do not inhibit examination of the terminated pregnancy reports to determine whether a physician performed an abortion in accordance with Indiana law,” per the Indiana Capitol Chronicle.

    The court has yet to set a hearing for the suit brought forward by Bernard and Rouse.

    Originally published by Latin Times.

    Source link