Tag: Means

  • NYC Defied Washington and Rejoined the WHO — Here’s What That Really Means

    NYC Defied Washington and Rejoined the WHO — Here’s What That Really Means

    On January 22, 2026, the United States officially completed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization — the culmination of an executive order signed by President Trump on his first day back in office. The U.S. halted all funding, recalled its personnel from Geneva, and ceased participation in WHO governance bodies.

    Less than two weeks later, New York City went the other direction.

    On February 5, 2026, the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene announced it had joined the WHO’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN) — becoming the first municipal health department in the United States to formally align with a WHO-affiliated body after the federal withdrawal. New York State, California, and Illinois have since followed with their own GOARN memberships.

    The move was framed as a public health necessity. Critics see it as something else: a city government using a bureaucratic workaround to defy a federal policy decision made by the elected president of the United States.

    What Is GOARN — And What Did NYC Just Sign Up For?

    GOARN is not the WHO itself, but it is coordinated by the WHO and operates as an arm of its global outbreak infrastructure. The network includes more than 360 technical institutions — national health agencies, UN bodies, academic institutions, and nongovernmental organizations — and its stated mission is rapid detection and response to infectious disease outbreaks worldwide.

    By joining, NYC’s health department gains:

    • Early-warning outbreak intelligence — weekly briefings on emerging global health threats before they reach American shores
    • Access to international laboratory networks — direct coordination with global health labs during active outbreaks
    • Workforce training through real-world international response deployments
    • Direct communication channels with global health partners during major health events

    NYC Acting Health Commissioner Dr. Michelle Morse framed it in practical terms: “New York City is a global city with 8.5 million residents and more than 12 million international visitors every year,”she said. “To best prevent disease outbreaks and public health emergencies and to protect New Yorkers and visitors from them, the NYC Health Department is joining hundreds of public health institutions worldwide that share critical public health information.”

    That logic has force. NYC is, in fact, a global disease entry point — as the city’s own 2026 measles cases (all linked to international travel) demonstrate.

    The Political Reality

    But the public health rationale doesn’t fully explain the timing or the tone.

    Mayor Zohran Mamdani — a Democratic Socialist inaugurated on January 1, 2026 — has been on a collision course with the Trump administration since before he took office. Trump openly backed his opponent, warned he would withhold federal funding if Mamdani won, and called the new mayor a “communist” on national television. Mamdani, for his part, has signed executive orders directly countermanding federal immigration enforcement, vowed to use “every tool of the law” against White House threats, and now — through his health department — has formalized a relationship with the very international body the president just paid $490 million in arrears to exit.

    The U.S. had committed to providing the WHO with $490 million in voluntary contributions for 2024 and 2025, which the Trump administration refused to pay before withdrawal — leaving the organization with a significant funding shortfall.

    Governor Hochul’s own statement on joining GOARN at the state level made the political intent explicit: “New York has always led in public health and safety and now we’re doing our part to protect lives while the federal government puts Americans’ health at risk.”

    That’s not a public health statement. That’s a campaign ad.

    What the Federal Government Actually Did — And Why

    The Trump administration’s HHS fact sheet on the WHO withdrawal cited three core reasons for leaving:

    1. The WHO’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic — specifically its deference to China in the early months of the outbreak
    2. Persistent refusal to adopt internal reforms
    3. Lack of accountability, transparency, and independence from political influence of member states

    These are not fringe complaints. They have been raised by public health experts across the political spectrum. As the WHO’s largest historical funder— contributing between $160 million and $815 million annually over the past decade — the U.S. had unique leverage to demand reform. Walking away, the argument goes, was the only credible threat left.

    The counter-argument: without U.S. participation, countries like China, Russia, India, and Saudi Arabia now have greater influence over WHO’s priorities and guidelines. That has real consequences for how global health crises are managed — and what information the U.S. receives in the early hours of an emerging outbreak.

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup Factor

    There is one genuinely nonpartisan reason NYC’s move to GOARN carries urgency: the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

    Matches will be played across North America this summer, with the final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. Greater New York alone is expected to draw more than one million international visitors in a matter of weeks. The city’s health infrastructure will need to track disease threats from dozens of countries simultaneously — exactly the kind of scenario GOARN was designed for.

    This is the one context where the “we need global intel” argument for GOARN membership is hardest to dismiss on partisan grounds.

    What This Means for New Yorkers

    In practical terms, day-to-day healthcare in New York City is not changing. GOARN membership does not give the WHO authority over NYC’s public health policy, vaccination mandates, or healthcare system. It is an information-sharing and coordination arrangement — not a governance transfer.

    What it does represent is a growing patchwork of sub-national governments — cities and states — making independent foreign health policy decisions, in direct contrast to the federal government. That trend, if it accelerates, raises legitimate questions about who actually sets American public health priorities when Washington and major population centers are pulling in opposite directions.

    For New Yorkers, the immediate question is simpler: does having earlier access to international outbreak intelligence make the city safer? The data suggests yes. Whether the political theater surrounding it helps or hurts is a separate question entirely.

    Breaking This Week: The WHO Assembly the U.S. Isn’t Attending

    The stakes of NYC’s GOARN move come into even sharper focus this week. The 79th World Health Assembly is currently underway in Geneva, Switzerland (May 18–23, 2026) — and for the first time in nearly 80 years, the United States has no seat at the table.

    The assembly is moving forward without Washington on several fronts that directly affect New York City and American public health:

    The WHO Pandemic Agreement annex negotiations. The WHO Pandemic Agreement — adopted by 120 countries in May 2025, without U.S. participation — is still being finalized. The critical PABS annex, which governs how countries share pathogen data and access vaccines during a future pandemic, is being negotiated at this assembly. The U.S. is not part of those talks. When the next pandemic begins, Washington will have no formal access to the early pathogen intelligence sharing system its own scientists helped build.

    Global health architecture reform. The assembly this week voted to establish a Member State-led reform process for the entire global health architecture — redesigning how the world coordinates on outbreaks, funding, and emergency response. The U.S. has no voice in shaping that redesign.

    The direct GOARN impact. In his address to the assembly on May 19, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus highlighted that GOARN coordinated 58 deployments to 16 countries in the past year alone — including rapid responses to Ebola in the DRC, Marburg virus in Tanzania and Ethiopia, and the ongoing hantavirus situation aboard the MV Hondius cruise ship. NYC’s GOARN membership means the city’s health department now receives that real-time intelligence directly. The federal CDC does not.

    The financial vacuum. The assembly opened under what UN News described as “the shadow of Ebola, hantavirus and funding cuts.” Ghana’s president, in his keynote, said his country lost $78 million in health funding following USAID cuts, with critical malaria and HIV programs affected. The U.S. withdrawal has forced the WHO to scale back operations globally — creating gaps in exactly the outbreak surveillance infrastructure that NYC is now trying to plug through GOARN membership.

    The irony is not subtle: as Washington steps back from the global health table, New York City has pulled up its own chair.

    Timeline: How We Got Here

    Date Event
    Jan 20, 2025 President Trump signs Executive Order 14155, initiating WHO withdrawal
    Jan 22, 2026 U.S. officially exits WHO; all funding terminated, personnel recalled
    Feb 5, 2026 NYC Health Dept. joins GOARN — first U.S. municipality to do so
    Feb 10, 2026 NY State joins GOARN under Gov. Hochul
    Feb–March 2026 California and Illinois health departments also join GOARN

    Related Reading on MedicalDaily

    Source link

  • NHS to Include Menopause in Health Checks from 2025 – What It Means for Women

    NHS to Include Menopause in Health Checks from 2025 – What It Means for Women

    In what campaigners are calling a ‘historic breakthrough’, the NHS in England will, for the first time, include questions about menopause during routine health checks for adults aged 40 to 74. The change, set to benefit up to millions of women, follows years of public pressure and advocacy from high-profile figures who accused the health system of failing women during one of the most consequential stages of their lives.

    Health Secretary Wes Streeting voiced that too many women had been dismissed, ignored or told their symptoms were just part of getting older. He added:

    ‘Women have been suffering in silence for far too long. This is the clearest signal yet that their voices are being heard.’

    For many, this policy is the culmination of a grassroots movement driven by high-profile advocates such as Davina McCall, whose own words laid bare the confusion and frustration that many women experience. She revealed:

    “I was furious at the lack of knowledge that I had as a 43-year-old woman going through perimenopause,” and said she felt “terrified, lonely, not knowing what it was.”

    Her candid testimony became part of the tide of public awareness and demand that the health service recognise menopause as the vital health priority it is.

    Reflecting on why she had not recognised the symptoms sooner, she said in an interview:

    “I had no idea. And I thought, how, why? Why do I not know about this?”

    Her testimony resonated widely, helping women across the UK identify their own symptoms and call for systemic change in how menopause is addressed within the NHS.

    Menopause specialist Dr Louise Newson, who founded the balance menopause app and has long argued that menopause should be part of preventive healthcare:

    ‘I didn’t realise until I opened my clinic … how many women really suffer and how many women give up their jobs, have partners that leave them, are in crisis, really worry about their future health and actually have quite intrusive suicidal thoughts as a direct consequence of their hormones.’

    The push for reform has been relentless. Labour MP Carolyn Harris, who chaired the UK’s All-Party Parliamentary Group on Menopause, was instrumental in shining a political spotlight on the issue. She told MPs last year:

    ‘This menopause revolution will bring an end to women’s suffering.’

    Advocacy organisation Menopause Mandate, which represents thousands of women, said the NHS decision proves the power of public outcry. A spokesperson commented:

    ‘Including menopause as a key part of the NHS 40+ health check is a major leap forward — for women and for business.’

    The NHS Health Check currently screens for heart disease, diabetes and stroke risk — all conditions that menopause can exacerbate. Symptoms such as hot flushes, heart palpitations, joint pain, sleep disturbance and anxiety affect around 75% of women, with 25% reporting severe symptoms.

    However, until now, menopause has not been included in any NHS screening programme, leaving many women to battle years of untreated symptoms or misdiagnoses.

    Professor Ranee Thakar, President of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said: “It is fantastic news that menopause conversations will now be included in routine NHS health checks for women over 40 years old… Creating space for women to get information about menopause symptoms, support and treatments will break down barriers, reduce stigma, and help many women live more happily and healthily in middle age.”


    GP Dr Ellie discusses new Menopause bill benefits in X video


    Beyond the clinical implications, the move is seen as a symbolic shift towards dismantling what campaigners have called ‘medical misogyny’. The decision marks a profound change in how the state views midlife women: not as invisible patients, but as individuals whose health is central to societal wellbeing.

    As Carolyn Harris MP stated during the parliamentary debate introducing the Menopause (Support and Services) Bill,

    “This is not just about women; this is about families, communities, the economy and society as a whole.”

    Originally published on IBTimes UK



    Source link