Category: Diseases & Conditions

  • Medicine Nobel To Trio Who Identified Immune System’s ‘Security Guards’

    Medicine Nobel To Trio Who Identified Immune System’s ‘Security Guards’

    A US-Japanese trio on Monday won the Nobel Prize in Medicine for research into how the immune system is kept in check by identifying its “security guards”, the Nobel jury said.

    The discoveries by Mary E. Brunkow and Fred Ramsdell of the United States and Japan’s Shimon Sakaguchi have been decisive for understanding how the immune system functions and why we do not all develop serious autoimmune diseases.

    Sakaguchi, a professor at the Immunology Frontier Research Centre in Osaka, told Swedish broadcaster Sveriges Radio: “It’s an honour for me. I’m looking forward to visiting Stockholm in December” to receive the award in person.

    The Nobel committee was however unable to reach the two US-based laureates to break the news to them in person.

    “If you hear this, call me,” the head of the Nobel Assembly, Thomas Perlmann, joked at the press conference announcing the winners.

    The three won the prize for research that identified the immune system’s “security guards”, called regulatory T-cells.

    Their work concerns “peripheral immune tolerance” that prevents the immune system from harming the body, and has led to a new field of research and the development of potential medical treatments now being evaluated in clinical trials.

    “The hope is to be able to treat or cure autoimmune diseases, provide more effective cancer treatments and prevent serious complications after stem cell transplants,” the jury said.

    Sakaguchi made the first key discovery in 1995.

    At the time, many researchers were convinced that immune tolerance only developed due to potentially harmful immune cells being eliminated in the thymus, through a process called “central tolerance”.

    Sakaguchi, 74, showed that the immune system is more complex and discovered a previously unknown class of immune cells, which protect the body from autoimmune diseases.

    Brunkow, born in 1961 and a senior project manager at the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle, and Ramsdell, a 64-year-old senior advisor at Sonoma Biotherapeutics in San Francisco, made the other key discovery in 2001, when they were able to explain why certain mice were particularly vulnerable to autoimmune diseases.

    “They had discovered that mice have a mutation in a gene that they named Foxp3,” the jury said.

    “They also showed that mutations in the human equivalent of this gene cause a serious autoimmune disease, IPEX.”

    Two years later, Sakaguchi was able to link these discoveries.

    The trio will receive their prize — a diploma, a gold medal and $1.2 million split three ways — at a formal ceremony in Stockholm on December 10.

    Researchers from major US institutions typically dominate the Nobel science prizes, due largely to the US’ longstanding investment in basic science and academic freedoms.

    But that could change down the line following massive US budget cuts to science programmes announced by President Donald Trump.

    Since January, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has terminated 2,100 research grants totalling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch.

    Thomas Perlmann, secretary general of the committee that awards the Nobel Prize for Medicine, told AFP it was “no coincidence that the US has by far the most Nobel laureates”.

    “But there is now a creeping sense of uncertainty about the US’ willingness to maintain their leading position in research,” he said.

    Trump has meanwhile made no secret of the fact that he wants to win a Nobel himself — the Peace Prize.

    Nobel experts have however said his “America First” policies and divisive style give him little chance.

    “It’s completely unthinkable,” Oeivind Stenersen, a historian who has conducted research and co-written a book on the prize, told AFP.

    “(Trump) is in many ways the opposite of the ideals that the Nobel Prize represents,” he said, citing “multilateral cooperation” as an example.

    Trump “follows his own path, unilaterally,” Stenersen added.

    Sudan’s networks of volunteers Emergency Response Rooms (ERR) helping people survive war and famine — are seen as a possible contender this year, as are media watchdogs the Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters Without Borders, and Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny.

    Source link

  • What Is TikTok’s Benadryl Challenge? Teen Almost Dies After Attempting Viral Trend

    What Is TikTok’s Benadryl Challenge? Teen Almost Dies After Attempting Viral Trend

    A South Carolina teenager is lucky to be alive after trying TikTok’s dangerous ‘Benadryl Challenge’, a viral stunt that urges kids to swallow massive doses of the over-the-counter allergy drug.

    The incident occurred earlier this week in Horry County and left the teen hallucinating with a racing heart before being rushed to hospital in critical condition. The scare has reignited warnings from parents, doctors and regulators about the deadly risks of social media dares.

    What Is the Benadryl Challenge?

    The ‘Benadryl Challenge’ is a reckless trend spreading on TikTok and other platforms where users down alarming amounts of diphenhydramine, the active ingredient in Benadryl, to trigger hallucinations.

    Although diphenhydramine is safe when taken in correct doses to treat allergies or as a sleep aid, large quantities can act as a toxic hallucinogen.

    According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, overdosing can lead to confusion, seizures, psychosis, coma or death.

    The challenge first came to public attention in 2020 after several hospitalisations and deaths were reported in the United States. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warnings at the time, urging young people to avoid the trend and calling on TikTok to remove content that promoted it.

    The South Carolina case

    In the latest case, the mother of the South Carolina teenager discovered her daughter in distress with a heart rate near 200 beats per minute. The girl was hallucinating and later required urgent medical care.

    According to reports, pill bottles and missing tablets were found hidden under her pillow. At first the teen claimed to have taken only two pills, but a larger number was missing.

    Doctors at the hospital questioned whether the ingestion had been a suicide attempt. The girl denied this, saying she had been told by a friend that taking enough Benadryl could cause a ‘high’.

    The mother also reported finding TikTok videos about the challenge on her daughter’s phone. She said she attempted to report the videos to the platform but was informed they did not breach community guidelines.

    Previous Fatalities Linked to the Trend

    The dangers of the Benadryl Challenge have been highlighted in several previous cases. In 2020, a 15-year-old girl in Oklahoma died after taking an overdose of diphenhydramine. That same year, multiple teenagers in Texas were hospitalised following overdoses reportedly linked to the trend.

    In 2023, 13-year-old Jacob Stevens from Ohio died after consuming up to 14 Benadryl tablets while friends filmed the attempt. He suffered seizures, was placed on a ventilator and never regained consciousness. His death prompted calls from his family for tighter controls on access to the drug.

    Health Warnings and Platform Response

    Medical professionals caution that diphenhydramine overdoses can cause serious anticholinergic toxicity, producing symptoms such as delirium, rapid heart rate, seizures, memory loss and in severe cases, organ failure.

    The FDA has previously warned that even modest overdoses can be life-threatening. TikTok has said that dangerous challenges are not permitted on its platform and that it blocks related search terms.

    However, families affected by these incidents continue to argue that harmful videos remain accessible and that reporting mechanisms are inadequate.

    IBTimes UK carried out a keyword search on TikTok and found no visible content under the term ‘Benadryl challenge’.

    Instead, users are directed to a safety notice that states: ‘Your Safety Matters. Some online challenges can be dangerous, disturbing, or even fabricated. Learn how to recognise harmful challenges so you can protect your health and well-being.’

    Originally published on IBTimes UK

    Source link

  • Dolly Parton Scraps Vegas Shows Over Health Issues

    Dolly Parton Scraps Vegas Shows Over Health Issues

    Dolly Parton, 79, has postponed her upcoming Las Vegas concerts due to “health challenges,” the American country music legend announced, although she stressed she is not yet ending her glittering career.

    “As many of you know, I have been dealing with some health challenges, and my doctors tell me that I must have a few procedures,” the singer-songwriter posted on social media late Sunday, without disclosing specifics.

    The “Jolene” and “I Will Always Love You” hitmaker kept her trademark humor intact, quipping that “it must be time for my 100,000-mile check-up, although it’s not the usual trip to see my plastic surgeon!”

    “In all seriousness, given this, I am not going to be able to rehearse and put together the show that you want to see.”

    Parton was set to perform six nights of sold-out shows in December at Caesars Palace. She revealed that the new dates are set for September of 2026.

    She told her millions of followers that she would continue her projects in Nashville but would need “a little time to get show ready, as they say.

    “And don’t worry about me quittin’ the business because God hasn’t said anything about stopping yet.”

    Parton became a major star in the 1970s, with singles including “Coat of Many Colors,” and followed up with smash hits like “I Will Always Love You,” famously covered by Whitney Houston, and “9 to 5.”

    Source link

  • Dr. Rahul Bansal’s Journey from Clinical Care Provider to CEO in Redefining Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care

    Dr. Rahul Bansal’s Journey from Clinical Care Provider to CEO in Redefining Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care

    When Dr. Rahul Bansal left India to continue his research at one of the universities in Pittsburgh, he carried with him not only a passion for medicine but also a deep desire to make a positive impact in the world. That commitment has shaped his career as a respected child and adolescent psychiatrist and inspired him to create MindWeal, a company aiming to redefine how America responds to the growing mental health crisis.

    Dr. Bansal’s path has been rooted in both scholarship and service. Over the years, he has treated patients from diverse backgrounds. He has also worked at some of the nation’s leading hospitals. His wide-ranging experience across inpatient, outpatient, intensive outpatient, and residential care settings gave him unique insight into the systemic gaps in mental health delivery.

    “Everywhere I practiced, I saw the same problem: demand for child psychiatry was overwhelming, and supply was painfully limited,” Dr. Bansal explained. “We cannot bridge the gap unless we empower mid-level providers with the right training and tools.”

    That conviction became the foundation of MindWeal. Founded in 2020, the organization was born from Dr. Bansal’s earlier outpatient practice, BanCAPs, and has since evolved into a comprehensive platform that blends technology, training, and clinical care. At its core is the 1300-touch-point diagnostic tool designed to help nurse practitioners achieve the same level of diagnostic accuracy as psychiatrists. The tool has been used in clinical settings and has shown promising results in improving diagnostic consistency.

    But for Dr. Bansal, innovation is not just about numbers; it’s about people. “Families don’t come to me asking about the latest treatment trend,” he said. “They come asking what’s wrong with their child. Diagnosis is the first and most important step, and we built a tool to get it right.”

    Beyond technology, Dr. Bansal has also prioritized education and training. Recognizing that nurse practitioners often receive limited exposure to child psychiatry during their schooling, MindWeal developed structured rotations and mentorship programs. Providers are supported in learning how to use the tool and in developing confidence around prescribing, managing medications, and engaging with families in meaningful ways.

    “You cannot build a sustainable system without empowering providers,” Dr. Bansal emphasized. “Mid-level providers are the backbone of mental health care. By giving them the right resources, we give children and families better outcomes.”

    Dr. Bansal’s influence extends beyond the clinic. He has authored multiple papers in psychiatry and is known for his research in autism and developmental disorders. His academic background continues to inform his vision for MindWeal, where evidence-based practice is a guiding principle.

    Under his leadership, MindWeal has grown into four practices across Illinois and Missouri, with plans to expand nationally. The company offers in-person, hybrid, and virtual care, balancing local trust with scalability. Patients and families have responded positively to MindWeal’s approach.

    Despite his success, Dr. Bansal remains grounded in his mission. “My inspiration is simple, I want to make a positive difference every day,” he reflected. “If we can bring clarity to families, empower providers, and create better outcomes for children, then we are doing something that truly matters.”

    Colleagues and collaborators echo his impact. Dr. Bansal’s efforts have begun to draw interest from healthcare systems and insurers, who see the potential of the new tool and MindWeal’s ecosystem to transform psychiatric care delivery at scale.

    Looking ahead, Dr. Bansal is focused not only on expanding MindWeal’s reach but also on shaping the national conversation about mental health. He is a vocal advocate for closing the gap between traditional psychiatric care and the innovative solutions emerging from technology and training. “The system is fragmented,” he said. “But we have the opportunity to rebuild it in a way that prioritizes accuracy, accessibility, and compassion.”

    From his early days training in child psychiatry in Michigan to his current role as CEO and thought leader, Dr. Rahul Bansal’s journey has been defined by vision, perseverance, and a relentless commitment to children’s well-being. With MindWeal, he is demonstrating how individual determination can contribute to broader change, and that the future of mental health care can be both innovative and deeply human.

    Source link

  • Over A Dozen Sunscreens Pulled From Shelves After Watchdog Exposes Major Flaw

    Over A Dozen Sunscreens Pulled From Shelves After Watchdog Exposes Major Flaw

    The makers of over a dozen suncreams have halted sales in Australia after a consumer advocacy group analysis found many of them did not provide the sun protection factor their makers claimed.

    Long, hot days in the sun are a fixture of daily life in Australia, famous for its good weather and outdoors-loving lifestyle.

    But the country also has the highest rate of skin cancer in the world — almost 19,000 Australians were estimated to be diagnosed with melanoma in 2024, official data shows.

    And an investigation in June by consumer group CHOICE found that of 20 popular brands of suncream tested, only four accurately matched their Sun Protection Factor (SPF) claims.

    A follow-up investigation by the Therapeutic Goods Administration released on Tuesday identified 21 suncreams that may fall short of their protection claims.

    In some cases, products that claimed to have sun protection factors of 50+ “were unlikely to have an SPF greater than 21”, the authority said.

    Of the flagged suncreams, eight have been voluntarily recalled, 10 have suspended sales, two are being reviewed and one is not sold nationally, according to the authority.

    “You may wish to consider using an alternative product until the TGA completes its review,” the agency warned.

    AFP has reached out to a number of the firms named for comment on the claims.

    Under current testing standards, things like how much suncream is applied and the degree of skin redness observed can impact the variability of results.

    Australia classifies suncreams under therapeutic goods — health-related products for human use rather than cosmetics — and are therefore regulated to ensure their safety and efficacy.

    Firms can face heavy penalties for inaccurate labelling.

    Anne Cust, acting director of cancer research institute Daffodil Centre, said suncream was “just one of the forms of protection”.

    She said people should apply suncream “as a last resort” and use it alongside other protective measures like seeking shade and wearing long sleeves.

    “The most important thing with sunscreen is to apply enough of it,” she said. “What is important is to put enough on your skin and reapply after a couple of hours.”

    The issue was particularly pressing given the looming summer season, Vice President of the Australian Medical Association Julian Rait told national broadcaster ABC.

    “People should still have confidence in the vast majority of suncream products, and they should still provide adequate protection from the sun, especially if used frequently,” he said.

    Source link

  • Parents Express Concern After President Donald Trump Brings Back Presidential Fitness Test

    Parents Express Concern After President Donald Trump Brings Back Presidential Fitness Test

    President Donald Trump’s decision to bring back the Presidential Fitness Test has sparked intense debate among parents nationwide.

    The test, which was phased out in 2013 during former President Barack Obama’s administration, will once again require students to perform physical challenges, including the mile run, sit-ups, push-ups, and flexibility tests. Many parents remember their own experiences with the test and express serious concerns about its impact on their children’s mental health and self-esteem.

    The announcement came in July 2025 when Trump signed an executive order surrounded by professional athletes in the White House Roosevelt Room. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will oversee the program as part of the broader “Make America Healthy Again” initiative. The order states that declining physical fitness poses “a threat to the vitality and longevity of our country” and weakens America’s economy, military readiness, and national morale, according to Cronkite News.

    Concerns Among Parents

    Parents across the country are sharing their own childhood experiences with the test, and many memories are far from positive. “I remember how hurtful this program was when we were in school. Traumatic and bullying. Hopeless,” wrote Mike from Salem, New Hampshire, in response to media polls about the test’s return. Similar sentiments are echoing through social media platforms and parent groups nationwide.

    The original Presidential Fitness Test, which ran from 1966 to 2013, required students to meet specific benchmarks to earn awards. For example, a 14-year-old girl needed to run a mile in under eight minutes, complete 40 sit-and-reaches, shuttle-run in about 10 seconds, and do 47 curl-ups to qualify for recognition, among other things, 29News reported.

    Physical education expert Judy LoBianco, who worked in New Jersey schools for over two decades, believes the test can embarrass less athletic kids, make them anxious, and discourage them from pursuing fitness. She argues that modern physical education should focus on joy, social interaction, and life skills rather than competitive testing.

    Implementation Questions Remain

    Parents are also questioning the practical aspects of the revived program, as many wonder whether schools with lower-performing students will receive additional resources, better meals, and improved physical education equipment.

    The Trump administration has positioned the test as part of a broader focus on youth health, citing concerning statistics about childhood obesity and physical inactivity. Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” report highlights that more than 70% of children ages six to 17 fail to meet federal guidelines for daily physical activity, as per NPR.



    Originally published on parentherald.com

    © {{Year}} ParentHerald.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

    Source link

  • Did COVID Lockdowns Doom Britain’s Youth? Inquiry Reveals Childhood ‘Torn Apart’ – Lasting Harm Was No Secret

    Did COVID Lockdowns Doom Britain’s Youth? Inquiry Reveals Childhood ‘Torn Apart’ – Lasting Harm Was No Secret

    In a stark revelation shaking Britain’s pandemic response, the UK COVID-19 Inquiry on 29 September 2025 exposed how lockdowns inflicted grievous harm on children, tearing at the very fabric of childhood through school closures and enforced isolation.

    Witnesses detailed severe, long-lasting impacts on education, mental health, and social development, with government decisions prioritising adults over youth despite known risks. As testimonies unfolded, it became clear that lasting harm to Britain’s youth was no secret, yet officials proceeded, dooming a generation to profound consequences.

    Inquiry Exposes Grievous Harm

    The inquiry’s major research report, published 15 September 2025, drew from interviews with 600 children aged 9-22, highlighting disrupted routines and missed milestones as an ‘empty time‘ of pandemic effects.

    Participants described family tensions and emotional drain, with one noting: ‘That was, like, very difficult having my mum, my auntie, my uncle; my brother was there as well and my cousin. So it was a very crowded place. It was also very, like, emotionally draining with kind of like family stuff. So I did end up, like, developing anxiety… I was very sad a lot of the time…’ This underscores how COVID lockdowns amplified home-based vulnerabilities for Britain’s youth.

    School Closures Chaos

    Government planning for school closures began only on 17 March 2020, the day before the announcement, despite earlier focus on keeping schools open. Former education secretary Gavin Williamson described the shift as a ‘discombobulating 24-hour sea change,’ highlighting inadequate preparation across UK nations. This failure exacerbated education disruption, with children missing crucial learning and social interactions.

    Online learning challenges included limited device access, as one child said: ‘I learn best when I have a physical thing in front of me …’ Exam cancellations and grade frustrations affected university aspirations, compounding long-term impacts.

    Vulnerable children suffered most, with schools as ‘constant eyes‘ for safeguarding; closures led to declined referrals and increased exposure to harm. The National Crime Agency noted rises in online abuse due to more time spent digitally during lockdowns.

    Mental Health Crisis Unveiled

    Post-lockdown readjustment proved tough, with one participant stating: ‘Not leaving the house… and then having to try and get used to being in public again, and going to school… definitely contributed to, like, my anxiety being a lot worse.’ Mental health issues surged, including body image worries and first-time service access among secondary-aged youth.

    Inquiry counsel Clair Dobbin KC emphasised: ‘The reality is that there were children who suffered grievous harm at the hands of their carers during the pandemic. The carers of those children bear responsibility for the violence and neglect inflicted on children, and these children stand as the starkest examples of what adults are capable of doing to children behind closed doors.’

    This highlights how lockdowns removed protective layers, leading to abuse and neglect.

    In an X post from LBC, it was shared: ‘Some children suffered “grievous harm” at the hands of those who should have been caring for them in the pandemic, the UK COVID-19 Inquiry has heard.’ Such public reactions amplify the inquiry’s findings.


    Baroness Heather Hallett noted the impact was ‘severe and, for many, long-lasting,’ urging lessons for future crises. Children’s rights groups called for apologies and prioritisation of youth in decisions.

    The four-week hearings, starting 29 September 2025, probe physical health, long COVID, and high absence rates, revealing systemic oversights. Stories from parents like Aisha illustrate ongoing struggles, with her son lacking education and facing trouble post-lockdown.

    Originally published on IBTimes UK



    Source link

  • Cytotoxic Drug Exposure, Genotoxicity, and the Unseen Risk to Autism

    Cytotoxic Drug Exposure, Genotoxicity, and the Unseen Risk to Autism

    For more than two decades, Jim Mullowney has been sounding the alarm about a problem many don’t want to confront: the hidden risks associated with human waste from cytotoxic drugs. As the founder of Pharma-Cycle, a company dedicated to providing safe collection and disposal systems for the urine, feces, and vomit of patients containing cytotoxic drugs, Mullowney has devoted his career to preventing birth defects, including autism, childhood cancer, and others.

    “I first realized what we were dealing with when I saw syringes full of chemotherapy drugs being mishandled at a hazardous waste facility,” recalls Mullowney. “These were not ordinary chemicals; many of them are cytotoxic, designed to alter the DNA of rapidly dividing cells, such as a child being born. They are life-saving in the right medical context, but their second-hand exposure is disastrous.”

    Cytotoxic drugs are indispensable in cancer care. They aim to target rapidly dividing cancer cells. But their second-hand potency has an enormous duality. While essential in treatment, their genotoxic nature means they can affect other fast-growing healthy cells, such as those in hair, skin, or the reproductive system of men and women of childbearing age, a known risk to fertility. This presents a major public health challenge because these hazardous agents can be shed by patients not just in urine and feces, but also in sweat, vomit, and saliva. That duality, which is at the heart of their therapeutic power yet makes them hazardous outside strict controls, is the undeniable reality at the core of Mullowney’s mission.

    “The reality is that hospitals handle these substances with extraordinary caution,” he explains. “You will see pharmacists working behind multi-million-dollar systems with robots mixing doses in sealed environments. Nurses wear protective gear. But after a patient receives treatment, they go home, and just like the vitamin you took this morning, where your urine looks like you ate a highlighter, the drugs continue to leave their system. That’s where the oversight drops off.”

    Mullowney also raises questions about potential connections between environmental exposures and conditions such as autism. While autism is widely understood as a complex neurodevelopmental condition with both genetic and environmental influences, Mullowney believes the role of hazardous drugs in shaping DNA deserves closer examination. “If autism has a genetic component, and we know certain chemicals are designed specifically to alter DNA, then it’s at least worth asking what impact secondhand exposure to cytotoxic drugs could have,” he says. Although no definitive link has been established, he argues that the issue highlights the need for expanded research into how these substances may affect future generations.

    Scientific literature has documented for decades that cytotoxic drugs are hazardous even in small amounts. The United States Pharmacopoeia, known as USP800, has long recognized the risks to healthcare workers under USP Chapter 800 exposed during preparation or administration. Mullowney believes the same awareness needs to extend beyond the hospital walls.

    “We know these drugs are excreted in sweat, urine, and stool,” he says. “Once outside controlled settings, they don’t just disappear. They can end up in wastewater, septic systems, and even on household surfaces. That raises questions about who else could be exposed, and what the long-term consequences might be.”

    While research has shown increased rates of miscarriage and birth defects among healthcare workers exposed to cytotoxic drugs, the broader impact on families and communities is less well studied. “Nobody disputes the toxicity of these substances,” he notes. “The gap is in connecting that knowledge to how we manage drug waste once patients leave the hospital.”

    Pharma-Cycle was founded to address precisely that gap. The company develops collection systems that aim to safely capture hazardous pharmaceutical waste before it contaminates our families and future generations, as well as enters the environment. “The simplest way to put it,” Mullowney explains, “is that we can’t treat these drugs like ordinary trash. They need a closed-loop system, collected, contained, and destroyed in a way that protects public health.”

    The challenge, he admits, is not technological but political. “The science is there. Various well-known safety and health agencies have recognized the dangers of cytotoxic drugs for decades. What’s missing is the will to standardize and enforce proper collection. Too often, regulatory agencies pass responsibility back and forth, and the result is inaction.”

    Mullowney believes broader change requires public awareness. “Most people don’t know this issue exists,” he says. “Hazardous cytotoxic drug waste rarely makes headlines.”

    That’s why he continues to advocate, not only as a business owner but as a father. “I’m not doing this for money,” Mullowney says. “I’m doing it because I have seen what these chemicals are and how poorly they have been handled. If we know these drugs can be harmful in microdoses, why aren’t we taking every step to prevent unnecessary exposure?”

    For Mullowney, the path forward is clear: improve public understanding, strengthen regulations, and implement proven systems for safe disposal. “We put a car on the moon,” he says, “but we still have not figured out how to consistently keep cytotoxic drugs out of our environment. That needs to change.”

    The urgency of his message is not rooted in alarmism but in precaution. As he says, “These are lifesaving medicines, and we will always need them. But if we don’t handle the waste responsibly, we could risk creating problems for future generations, including autism and other birth defects. Prevention is always better than repair.”

    Source link

  • What Type of Cancer Was He Diagnosed With and Is He Still Sick?

    What Type of Cancer Was He Diagnosed With and Is He Still Sick?

    James Van Der Beek’s unexpected cameo during the Dawson’s Creek reunion concert has fans once again asking tough questions: what type of cancer is the actor battling, and is he still fighting the disease?

    The 48-year-old star, forever remembered as Dawson Leery in the hit ’90s teen drama, first revealed in 2024 that he was facing a serious health battle.

    Though he couldn’t join the live event in New York, his virtual appearance reignited speculation and worry among fans, many of whom took to social media to express both concern and support.

    What Does James Van Der Beek Have?

    In an interview with People in November 2024, James Van Der Beek confirmed that he is battling Stage 3 colorectal cancer.

    ‘I have colorectal cancer. I’ve been privately dealing with this diagnosis and have been taking steps to resolve it, with the support of my incredible family,’ the actor said.

    This form of cancer affects the colon or rectum and is often detected during routine screenings such as colonoscopies. According to Mayo Clinic, symptoms can include persistent changes in bowel habits, abdominal discomfort, and weight loss without trying.

    Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide, and early detection is considered key in improving survival rates. Van Der Beek’s openness about his illness has drawn attention to the importance of awareness, especially among younger adults who might overlook potential symptoms.

    James Van Der Beek’s Illness Timeline

    The actor first went public with his diagnosis in 2024, stating that he was undergoing treatment while continuing to focus on his family life. Van Der Beek and his wife, Kimberly, share six children, and he has often credited them as his motivation during his health struggles.

    In September 2025, Van Der Beek was due to appear at a one-night-only live reading of the Dawson’s Creek pilot script at the Richard Rodgers Theatre in New York. The event was organised as a reunion for fans and a fundraiser for the charity F Cancer. Just days before the reunion, Van Der Beek announced that he would not be attending in person after suffering from separate stomach viruses on top of his cancer battle.

    Although unable to take the stage, he surprised fans with a pre-recorded video appearance. In the clip, he thanked the audience, cast, and organisers, introducing Lin-Manuel Miranda as his understudy for the evening.

    @goss.ie #JamesVanDerBeek made an unexpected virtual appearance during the #DawsonsCreek reunion charity event on Monday night, after previously withdrawing due to illness. The star-studded charity event featured a live reading of the show’s pilot episode and brought together beloved Dawson’s Creek cast members including Michelle Williams, Katie Holmes, Joshua Jackson, Mary Beth Peil, John Wesley Shipp, Mary-Margaret Humes, Nina Repeta, Kerr Smith, Meredith Monroe, and Busy Philipps ❤️ Directed by Dawson’s Creek alum Jason Moore, the event supported F Cancer and also honored Van Der Beek, who was diagnosed with stage 3 colorectal cancer last year. 🎥 @backtoyoubobpod #dawsonscreekreunion ♬ original sound – Goss.ie


    Is James Van Der Beek Still Sick?

    The question ‘is James Van Der Beek sick?’ has become a trending search as fans follow his health updates. His absence from the reunion highlighted that he is still managing illness alongside treatment. While the actor has not disclosed specific details of his current medical regimen, his comments and public appearances confirm that his fight with cancer is ongoing.

    Support from his wife Kimberly and their children has been central to his journey. The family have shared glimpses of their life on social media, showing both the challenges and moments of hope as he continues treatment.

    Dawson’s Creek Reunion and Public Support

    The Dawson’s Creek reunion drew significant attention not only for nostalgia but also for its charitable cause. The event raised funds for F Cancer, an organisation dedicated to cancer education and early detection.

    Fans responded with strong messages of support for Van Der Beek after his video message was played at the theatre.

    Lin-Manuel Miranda’s appearance as Dawson Leery was also widely discussed, but it was Van Der Beek’s heartfelt words that left a lasting impression. Many fans took to social media to express admiration for his strength and resilience.

    Originally published on IBTimes UK



    Source link

  • First Successful Gene Therapy for Huntington’s Disease Slows Disease Progression by 75%

    First Successful Gene Therapy for Huntington’s Disease Slows Disease Progression by 75%

    An experimental gene therapy developed by uniQure has, for the first time, shown a dramatic slowing of Huntington’s disease progression in human patients, offering hope for a condition long considered incurable.

    How the Trial Worked

    The therapy, called AMT-130, was administered via a one-time neurosurgical procedure lasting 12 to 20 hours using a modified viral vector to deliver corrective DNA to regions of the brain affected by the disease. Patients treated with a high dose saw their disease progress 75% more slowly over a 36-month period compared to matched external controls. Secondary outcomes showed a 60% slower decline in functional abilities. The treatment was generally well-tolerated, with no major new safety concerns reported.

    Sarah Tabrizi, director of UCL’s Huntington’s Disease Centre, said these findings mark “We now have a treatment for one of the world’s more terrible diseases. This is absolutely huge. I’m really overjoyed.” uniQure now plans to submit a Biologics License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in early 2026.

    Regulatory Advances & Future Steps

    Earlier in 2025, the FDA granted AMT-130 Breakthrough Therapy designation, which may expedite review and regulatory pathways. In a regulatory update, uniQure disclosed that it is aligning key analytic and manufacturing plans with FDA guidance ahead of the BLA submission.

    The company intends to use external control data sets, like ENROLL-HD, for primary comparisons in its statistical analysis plan.

    Why This Breakthrough Is So Significant

    • Disease-modifying therapy: Until now, Huntington’s treatments have only addressed symptoms; AMT-130 indicates the possibility of altering disease trajectory.
    • One-time administration: Because it is delivered via a single surgical procedure, its benefits—if durable—could last years without repeated dosing.
    • High unmet need: In the U.S., about 41,000 people live with Huntington’s and over 200,000 carry risk alleles.
    • Scientific validation: The magnitude of effect in this trial is among the most convincing in neurodegenerative disease research to date.

    How AMT-130 Compares to Other Gene Therapies

    AMT-130’s approach—one-time neurosurgical delivery of a vector designed to suppress the mutant huntingtin protein—is somewhat unique among genetic therapies, in both delivery method and disease target.

    Here are some points of comparison:

    Therapy Mode of Delivery / Regimen Indication / Age Group Key Strengths Known Limitations / Risks
    AMT-130 (uniQure) Single stereotactic brain surgery (direct striatal infusion) Early-manifest Huntington’s disease Promising stabilization of function, one-time treatment, demonstrable biomarker improvements Surgical risks, inflammatory complications, durable long-term efficacy unknown
    Zolgensma (Onasemnogene abeparvovec-AVXS-101) Single intravenous or intrathecal in some trials Spinal Muscular Atrophy (infants and older children) Has shown dramatic improvements in survival, motor function; among best-known successful gene therapies Very high cost, immune reactions, limited age window, administration logistics
    Nusinersen (Spinraza) Repeated intrathecal injections (ongoing) SMA across age groups Reduces disease burden, extends life, widely used; well-understood safety profile Requires regular dosing, invasiveness, burdens on patients/caregivers, cost

    Cautions and Limitations

    • Not a cure: While the slowing is impressive, it does not reverse the disease or fully stop its course.
    • Surgery risk and cost: The invasive nature and complexity of delivery limit its applicability, especially in less capable surgical settings.
    • Long-term durability unknown: Whether the effect holds beyond three years remains to be seen.
    • Regulatory and access hurdles: Approval does not guarantee access, and pricing, reimbursement, and manufacturing scale remain major challenges.

    Source link