Dr. Anthony Fauci, superintendent of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID) since 1984, this year rose to national prominence as the leader of the White House Coronavirus Task Force. By the time everything is said and done, he may end up wishing he’d gained less public exposure.

In the October 19, 2020, report1 “Dr. Fauci’s COVID-1 9 Treachery, ” Dr. Peter Breggin uncovers Fauci’s “chilling ties” to the Chinese Communist Party( CCP) and its military.

A second, legal, report2 by Breggin entitled “COVID-1 9& Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Impression on Individual, Societies and Society, ” was filed in a federal tribunal in Ohio, August 31, 2020, as one of the purposes of a prosecution and injunction to put an end to the state’s pandemic measures.

According to Breggin, Fauci “has been the major force” behind investigate undertakings that enabled the CCP to manufacture lethal SARS coronaviruses, which in turn led to the release — whether incidental or not — of SARS-CoV-2 from the Wuhan Institute of Virology( WIV) in Wuhan, China.

Breggin claims Fauci has helped the CCP obtain “valuable U.S. patents, ” and that he, in its partnership with the CCP and the World Health Organization, first quelled the truth about the causes and perils of the pandemic, thereby enabling the dissemination of the virus from China to the rest of the world.

Fauci has, and is continuing to, shield the CCP and himself, Breggin says, by “denying the beginning of SARS-CoV-2” and “delaying and thwarting worldwide attempts to deal rationally with the pandemic.”

Gain-of-Function Research Supported by Fauci

In the ministerial summing-up of the report, Breggin documents 15 controversial pleasures that Fauci has been engaged in, starting with the fact that he funded risky gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses, both by individual Chinese researchers and the WIV in collaboration with American investigates. This study, Breggin says, countenanced the CCP and its military to create their own bioweapons, including SARS-CoV-2.

He points out that the American-Chinese collaboration was initially detailed in a article been established by two Chinese investigates, Botao Xiao( studied at Northwestern University and Harvard Medical School) and Lei Xiao back in February 2020. According to Breggin, the CCP impelled them to disavow and the working paper was withdrawn.

“The stated purpose[ of gain-of-function research] is to learn to prevent and give future outbreaks; but research labs are the most common generator of eruptions from risky pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, as well as two earlier incidental escapes by SARS viruses in 2004 from a research facility in Beijing, ” Breggin writes. 3

As previously reported by Newsweek, 4 the NIAID-funded gain-of-function research into at-bat coronaviruses was conducted in two parts. The first, which started on 2014 and ended in 2019,5 focused on “understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.” Initial findings6 were published in Nature Medicine in 2015.

The program, which had a fund of $3.7 million, was to be provided by Wuhan virologist Shi Zheng-Li and sought to catalogue wild at-bat coronaviruses. It also involved U.S. scientists such as Ralph Barric from the University of North Carolina and Charles Lieber from Harvard. 7

The second phase that began in 2019 included added surveillance of coronaviruses together with gain-of-function research to investigate how at-bat coronaviruses might mutate to affect humen. This second phase was run by the EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit research radical led by Peter Daszak, the panel of experts on cancer ecology. According to Newsweek, the project proposal showed the research to be conducted as follows :8

“’We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone engineering, in vitro and in vivo illnes ventures and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that% divergence thresholds in S protein sequences foresee spillover potential.’

In layman’s calls,’ spillover potential’ refers to the ability of a virus to jump-start from animals to humen, which requires that the virus be able to attach to receptors in the cadres of humans. SARS-CoV-2, for instance, is adept at binding to the ACE2 receptor in human lungs and other organs.

According to Richard Ebright, an infectious disease professional at Rutgers University, the project description refers to experimentations that would enhance the ability of bat coronavirus to infect human cadres and laboratory animals employing techniques of genetic engineering. In the aftermath of the pandemic, that is a noteworthy detail.”

Why Did Fauci Continue Gain-of-Function Research?

While President Trump canceled funding for dangerous gain-of-function research on viruses in April 2020 after the Chinese-American collaborations became publicly held, Fauci has since “unleashed a cloudburst of new funding that will almost certainly” help Chinese scientists with CCP ties who are still working in many U.S. universities and other investigate facilities.

Part of the financing is again directed to the EcoHealth Alliance, which for years has outsourced its research projects to WIV and other Chinese researchers. That said, recent reports indicate the NIH is now demanding “the organizations activities” raise records detailing its work with the Wuhan lab before the funding is liberated. 9

Fauci also continued outsourcing gain-of-function research to the WIV back in 2014, after then-President Obama prescribed a stop to such research. At the time, he also continued to fund collaborations between U.S. and WIV investigates, led by Vineet Menachery, Ph.D ., at the University of North Carolina.

“In guild to outsource hazardous viral research from the U.S. to China during the Obama moratorium, Fauci prematurely agreed to this Wuhan Institute as a highest degree containment equipment( known as BSL-4) capable of safely are concerned with destructive viruses, ” Breggin writes. 10

“He did this while knowing the Institute had a very poor safety record and while also knowing that all such facilities in China are overseen by the military as part of its biowarfare curriculum. Thus, Fauci created two grave worldwide threats, the accidental release of a deadly coronavirus and/ or its abuse as a military weapon.”

Interestingly, while the original moratorium on gain-of-function research was a direct degree by the President, when the suspension was promoted at the end of 2017, it was done so by the National Institutes of Health and the NIAID.

Fauci holds himself out as the eventual informant of objective scientific information and science-based judgments. In world, he works with and entitles globalist pharmaceutical conglomerates and globalist formations … These globalists gained dominance and affect as their policies and patterns, includes the shutdowns, continue to worsen necessities in all regions of the world.~ Dr. Peter Breggin

Fauci likewise attacked and promoted gain-of-function research on bird flu viruses ten years ago, saying such research was worth the risk because it allows scientists to prepare for pandemics. 11 However, as mentioned by Breggin, this kind of research does not appear to have improved governments’ pandemic responses one whit.

Downplaying COVID-1 9 Probabilities

Next, Breggin points out Fauci’s a link with and assist of Director-General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a are part of a Marxist-Leninist Ethiopian political party whose corrupted past and gunman ties ought to have foreground ever since his controversial nomination. 12,13, 14 Incidentally, Tedros has also been accused of covering up cholera outbreaks in Ethiopia.

“Together, they first minimise the chances of COVID-1 9. Fauci and Tedros too delayed worldwide preparing for the pandemic while permitting the Chinese to spread the virus with thousands of international passenger flights, ” Breggin writes, adding 😛 TAGEND

“Fauci publicly eroded the President’s criticism of Director-General Tedros and China. Instead, Fauci reassured the world that Tedros was a trustworthy and’ outstanding’ man — implying that Tedros’s acquaintances in China were similarly reliable and could be trusted.”

Fauci’s Globalist Ties

Interestingly, Fauci recently published a paper in which he again rejects the opportunities that SARS-CoV-2 was created in and secreted from the WIV, suggesting instead for a natural mutant.

“By persistently and unequivocally claim that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from nature untouched by lab manipulations, Fauci continues to protect himself and China, and their relationship, to the endangerment of America and countries around the world, ” Breggin writes.

“Fauci holds himself out as the ultimate root of objective scientific information and science-based agreements. In reality, he works with and entitles globalist pharmaceutical houses and globalist organizations such as WHO and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation … These globalists gained strength and force as their policies and practices, including the shutdowns, continue to worsen conditions throughout the world.”

The globalist, technocratic plan likewise reflects through Fauci’s call for a policy agenda that protects its own population from pathogens by limiting or eliminating “aggressive” and manmade interventions into nature. Fauci’s paper, be made available in the publication Cell in September 2020, speaks in part: 15

“The COVID-1 9 pandemic is yet another remember … that in a human-dominated world, in which our human activities represent aggressive, damaging, and unbalanced interactions with nature, we will increasingly cause new canker comings.

We remain at risk for the foreseeable future. COVID-1 9 is among the most vivid wake-up calls in over a century. It should thrust us to begin to think in earnest and collectively about lives here in more thoughtful and artistic unison with mood … ”

Indeed, this communication is straight out of the technocratic guide , now rebranded as “the Great Reset.” As pointed out by Breggin 😛 TAGEND

“Fauci’s utopian programme, which overlaps with the Green New Deal, would permanently curb and disrupt the activities and the standard of living of the 7.8 billion people on Earth in the vain hope of reducing future pandemics.

Thus the American official most responsible for the creation of SARS-CoV-2 in a Chinese lab instead condemns its causes on human interventions into the environment and nature, thereby altogether absolving himself while regarding humanity responsible.

Simultaneously, he is using the pretext of protecting us from viruses to impose a progressive despot agenda upon humanity. Indeed, the most important one, most aggressive, and most dangerous human involvements into sort must include Fauci-funded gain-of-function research in which viruses are taken out of nature and engineered into pathogens.”

Fauci Continues to Hype COVID-1 9 Gambles

In the main body of the report( Page 7 onward ), Breggin will continue to detail Fauci’s capacity in the media fearmongering that has allowed pandemic appraises to pull from an initial call for a two-week lockdown to eight months and weighing. “Most beings have very idealistic horrors about the risk of dying from COVID-1 9, ” Breggin records, and “This is due in part to the CDC and to Dr. Anthony Fauci who inflate the risk of COVID-1 9 deaths.”

According to data1 6 released by the CDC August 26, 2020, only 6% of the total COVID-1 9-related deaths in the U.S. had COVID-1 9 scheduled as the sole cause of death on the extinction certificate. The remaining 94% had an average of 2.6 health conditions that contributed to their deaths.

“Most people who die while being positive for SARS-CoV-2 are near to or past their median longevity. In addition to being old-fashioned, the great majority are already ill with congestive heart failure, cancer, or some other chronic illnesses that may in fact have caused them to die.

But even use the CDC’s biased data, the risk of death for most people is too small to require them to sacrifice the quality of their lives as the government involves under the threat of catching COVID-1 9, ” Breggin writes.

COVID-1 9 Is Less Lethal Than the Flu for Most

According to a September 2, 2020, article1 7 in Annals of Internal Medicine, the infection fatality ratio has been overestimated due to the fact that many who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 remain asymptomatic, which represents it difficult to estimate the true infection rate.

The researchers found that, when eliminating those residing in nursing homes and other long-term care equipment, the infection fatality rate for the average person is as follows 😛 TAGEND

Overall( all ages) — 0.26%

People younger than 40 — 0.01%

Beings age-old 60 or older — 1.71%

The estimated infection fatality rate for seasonal influenza listed in this paper is 0.8%. Other sources set it a bit higher. In either occasion, this meaning that if you’re under the age of 60, your fortune of dying from the influenza is greater than your opportunity of dying from COVID-1 9.

Breggin quotes CDC data, noting that the CDC is using overstated figures, but even at that, the risk of extinction for people under the age of 70 is lower than that of the flu. Harmonizing to CDC reckons, the infection fatality rates are as follows: 18

0-19 years — 0.003%( 3 in 100, 000)

20 -4 9 times — 0.02%

50 -6 9 years — 0.5%

70+ years — 5%

As noted by Breggin, the threat to children and youths is exceedingly small-scale, “Yet Dr. Fauci and other public health officials continue to act as if there is a grave threat of exposing children and young adults to SARS-CoV-2, when there is not, ” Breggin writes.

Breggin’s 55 -page report1 9 is well worth reading in its entirety. It contains far more details than I’ve been able to provide in this overview, and is fully referenced.

Fauci Continues to Dismiss Hydroxychloroquine

Breggin’s law report, 20 “COVID-1 9& Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effect on Soul, Prisons and Society, ” is likewise worth see. It addresses the totalitarian threat posed by the world response to the pandemic, and details the psychological enterprises behind the fearmongering and the underhanded methods used to discredit hydroxychloroquine, among other things.

Included is an open letter addressed to Fauci about his dismissal of hydroxychloroquine, signed by Drs. George C. Fareed, Michael M. Jacobs and Donald C. Pompan, which reads, in part: 21

“Dear Dr. Fauci:

You were placed into the most high-profile role seeing America’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. Americans have is dependent upon your medical knowledge concerning the wearing of disguises, resuming employment, returning to school, and of course medical treatment.

You are largely unchallenged in terms of your medical beliefs … This is unusual in the medical profession in which doctors’ sentiments are challenged by other physicians in the form of exchanges between doctors at infirmaries, medical seminars, as well as debate in medical periodicals.

You interpret your opinions unchallenged, without formal public resist from specialists who passionately are not in accordance with you. It is incontestable that the populace is best provided when beliefs and program are based on the reigning testify and discipline, and able to withstand the scrutiny of medical professionals.

As suffer accrued in treating COVID-1 9 infections, specialists worldwide discovered that high-risk cases can be treated successfully as an outpatient, within the first five to seven days of the onslaught of evidences, with a’ cocktail’ consisting of hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin( or doxycycline ). Multiple scholarly contributions to the literature detail the efficacy of the hydroxychloroquine-based combination treatment.

Dr. Harvey Risch, the renowned Yale epidemiologist, wrote an section in May 2020 in the American Journal of Epidemiology designation’ Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-1 9 Cases that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to Pandemic Crisis’ …

Dr. Risch is an expert at estimating research data and study patterns, producing over 300 clauses. Dr. Risch’s assessment is that there is explicit exhibit for the early and safe exploit of the’ HCQ cocktail’ …

Yet, you continue to reject the use of hydroxychloroquine, except in a hospital mounting in accordance with the arrangements of clinical ordeals, frequently emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting its use. Hydroxychloroquine, despite 65 years of use for malaria, and over 40 times for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, with a well-established safety profile, has been regarded by you and the FDA as unsafe for use in the treatment of symptomatic COVID-1 9 illness.

Your opinions have influenced the thinking of physicians and their patients, medical boards, nation and federal agencies, pharmacists, hospices, and simply about everyone involved in medical decision making.

Indeed, your opinions affected the health of Americans, and many aspects of our day-to-day lives including employment and school. Those of us who prescribe hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin/ doxycycline conclude fervently that early outpatient abuse would save tens of thousands of lives and enable our country to dramatically alter the response to COVID-1 9.

We propose for the purposes of an coming that will reduce horror and allow Americans to get their lives back. We to be expected that our questions enforce you to reconsider your current coming to COVID-1 9 infection.”

Fauci –‘ An Extraordinarily Destructive Force’

In Breggin’s appraisal, Fauci “has been and continues to be an extraordinarily destructive force in the world.” Not merely did he frisk a role in China’s ability to create SARS-CoV-2 and other potential biological weapons, he’s too covering up its lineage, and first tried to downplay the threat of the romance virus.

To top it off, “he became the go-to scientist and conduct czar for the most pandemic that he helped to create, tremendously increasing his influence and force, and the property of his institute and his world traitors, including Bill Gates and the international pharmaceutical companies, ” Breggin writes, adding, in conclusion 😛 TAGEND

“In his rise to power, Fauci has done a great deal of added injure … for example, by suppressing the most effective, safest, and least expensive medication treatment( hydroxychloroquine in varying compoundings ), while manipulating his clinical research to promote an inadequate, hazardous, and highly expensive treat( remdesivir ).

Fauci has also been supporting increased COVID-1 9 occasion weighs and reported deaths per the CDC, then consuming the increase estimates to justify inhuman public health measures that have no precedent and limited or no scientific basis, but add to his influence and superpower and to the wealth of his globalist identifies …

It is time to fire Fauci, to investigate this whole trouble, and to consider what needs to be done to protect the US and the world from future lab-generated pandemic catastrophes, whether accidental or intentional.”

Read more: articles.mercola.com