In July 2020, Facebook announced they would contributed descriptions to announces from politicians “to protect the holding of elections and promote healthy civic engagement.”1 The names were supposed to identify content Facebook thought was inflammatory, misinformation or lies, without removing the post.
Why Facebook felt they should “moderate” free speech that was not incendiary or promoted cruelty is a question for another time. Harmonizing to left-leaning Media Matters for America, 2 while the media giant continues to use labels on poles, a study of Trump’s announces found that those “thats been” labeled as possible misinformation had significantly more interactions than those that were not labeled.
In other paroles, the labels appeared to engage more books. Facebook began researching a new label in July 2021. These descriptions don’t precisely distinguish possible “misinformation, ” but go any further to stimulate readers — asking if their friends are becoming radicals. 3 Historically, extreme minds have proven to advance society or lag it back into the Dark Ages. Consider 😛 TAGEND
Book burning by the Nazis to ensure the next generation did not providing access to anticipates contrary to Hitler4
The project that humans can fly, leading to the Wright brethren inventing the airplane
That energy could be controlled, with dreamers like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Edison working to find ways to have lamp in the dark
That the medical establishment didn’t entertain the idea of handwashing to stop the spread of disease until 20 years of data evidenced the practice lowered paces of infection5
The thread that runs through these extreme ideas is that censorship influences the style culture fantasizes and therefore changes the results of the. Had the German people been allowed to think for themselves, an part country may not have been swayed by the propaganda of one human. If the medical community were open to the idea that their behavior was killing people, they may have saved thousands.
Of course, there are extreme suggestions that should not be entertained. People will never is the possibility of fly without succour or walk into fire without defence. Yet, without censorship, these sentiments die a natural fatality. It’s simply through debate and sharing information that the truth winnings out. And the truth is the only foundation on which culture can realistically and confidently continue.
Facebook Labels Gardeners as Possible Activists
CNN reported that Facebook causes are being shown to some individuals, prudence them that they may know someone who is becoming an extremist. Other promptings are letting people know they’ve been exposed to extremist content. This is part of Facebook’s Redirect Initiative. 6 Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone told CNN: 7
“This test is part of our large work to assess ways to provide resources and support to beings on Facebook who may have engaged with or were exposed to extremist content or may know someone who is at risk. We are partnering with NGOs and academic experts in this space and hope to have more to share in the future.”
In the past, Facebook has been criticized for not acting on content that encourages people toward brutality. Yet, these admonishes are also attached to berths sharing information about apparently innocuous topics, like buying nutrient. Harmonizing to CNET :8
“One of the notifies, shared on Twitter, asks:’ Are you concerned that someone you know is becoming an extremist? We care about preventing extremism on Facebook. Others in your statu has come forward with confidential support.’
Another alert speaks:’ Violent groups try to manipulate your indignation and disappointment. You can take action now to protect yourself and others.’”
As an likenes saved on archive.is from Reddit establishes, 9 Facebook is labeling those selling home-grown beef as “too prepared.” Compare the extremist contemplates of preparedness to the Forbes1 0 report August 17, 2021, that the Taliban would have control of the Afghan social media accounts.
However, it doesn’t stop there. Twitter affixes are reporting screenshots of canning and gardening radicals that are also being asked, “Are you concerned that someone you know is too prepared? We care about frustrating extremism on Facebook. Others in your place has come forward with confidential support.”
In other oaths, Facebook is labeling people who are preparing their food supply as potential fanatics, but in August 2021, the social monster was fine with activist radicals like the Taliban taking over Afghan social media histories. 11 Twenty-four hours later, though, Reuters1 2 reported Facebook had a ban on the Taliban posting on the social media stage. According to vice president of content policy Monika Bickert: 13
“They will not be allowed while they are prescribed by the U.S. law and even if they were not prescribed by U.S. ordinance, we would have to do a plan analysis on whether or not they nevertheless violate our hazardous organisations policy.”
Bickert is referring to the fact that the U.S. has soft-pedaled their posture on the group as they are not on the U.S. State Department’s list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. 14 Since the U.S. had not been able to classified them as gunmen, they can enter negotiations1 5 with working group whose wars historically have been less than trustworthy. 16,17, 18
Facebook’s definition of militant plans apparently conforms to the doctrines of the World Economic Forum( WEF ), of which Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder and CEO of Facebook, is a part of that. 19
For example, while some consider a guaranteed basic income paid by the government to all citizens as progressive and dystopian, according to a charismatic appearance Zuckerberg made during a inauguration addres at Harvard, 20 moving the financial scaffold “of the worlds” to universal basic income is not an extremist move.
Instead, it’s something to be explored and researched. As reported by the WEF, Zuckerberg explained that “too few people had the opportunity to try out new ideas — like house his world-conquering platform.”2 1 This is in line with the WEF’s mission to reinvent the future2 2 by resetting the global fiscal platform. 23
Facebook Act Called to Question in Early 2019
In late 2018, PBS’s “Frontline” liberated a two-part film announced “The Facebook Dilemma, ”2 4,25 in which James Jacoby probed the affected by the social media beings had over the democracy of commonwealths, and the lack of privacy parameters that allowed for tens of millions of users’ data to be siphoned and used to influence U.S. elections.
During 2019 Bloomberg2 6 reported Facebook was taping flecks of audio the government has recorded from users’ telephones. This explained how many were realizing targeted ads after just speaks with a product or service out loud. Further research exposed even more disturbingly, Android apps were taking screen shots of your smartphone and sending the information to third parties. 27
According to The Guardian, 28 in 2018 Facebook had 40 correspondents who worked as information checkers pinpointed across the globe. They were split in their opinion about their fact-checking relationship with Facebook. The Guardian mentioned one who said: 29
“Why should we trust Facebook when it’s drive the same rumors that its own fact checkers are calling fake news? It’s worth asking how do they consider narratives about George Soros on the platform knowing they exclusively compensate parties to try to link political enemies to him? Working with Facebook procreates us look bad.”
Some writers spoke with a reporter from The Guardian, who said they told him, 30 “Facebook’s hiring of a PR firm that used an antisemitic narrative to repudiate reviewers — fueling the same kind of propaganda fact checkers regularly debunk — should be a deal-breaker.”
The accusations into Facebook’s PR pleasures came after the European Parliament called for a privacy scrutiny when it was revealed that Facebook let Cambridge Analytica to misuse 87 million users’ data to influence election results. 31 The infraction penalty Facebook a mere $643,000 for the role it played, which they paid to the U.K.’s Information Commissioner’s office.
Facebook’s reported revenue for the first fourth in 2021 was $26.17 billion, up 48%, due in part from higher-priced advertising. 32 Although the fine was a drop in the barrel when compared against Facebook’s revenue, it was the maximum possible penalty that could be imposed under the Data Protection Act 1998. Under the new laws transferred in 2018, the maximum penalize have had an opportunity to $22 million. 33
The reporter from The Guardian wrote that one of the fact checkers, Brooke Binkowski, shared how Facebook affected the performance of their duties, sometimes to protect their advertisers, writing: 34
“ … it appeared that Facebook was pushing reporters to prioritize debunking misinformation that affected Facebook advertisers, which she contemplated swept a line: ‘You’re not doing journalism any more. You’re doing propaganda.’”
This is inline with current activities, since extremist content that shares preparedness, self-reliance, and evidence-based data about viral spread, masking or shot planneds may have an impact on the push towards the “Great Reset.”
Facebook’s Prepandemic Campaign Against Vaccine Information
Facebook’s campaign against parties sharing information about vaccination platforms had grown in strength even before the COVID-1 9 genetic rehabilitation shot planned. As I reported in early 2019, it was likely driven to protect the interests of their pharmaceutical advertisers. 35,36, 37
While many accept vaccination programs are not advantageous, consider Pfizer’s Prevnar 13 inoculation, which is supposed to protect against common sprains of pneumonia and performed three times more money than Viagra in 2015.38
The rising benefits from Prevnar 13 in 2015 were thanks to the U.S. government’s recommendation to start using it in adults over 65, and not only in children. 39 As noted in the Financial Times, 40 “ … the success of Prevnar demonstrates[ vaccines] can be as profitable as any drug.” So, if you have forums on Facebook sharing true experiences about vaccine side effects, you can see why Pfizer wouldn’t want those notes left there.
When you have a profitable business, you want to promote sustained growth. This wants fostering and protecting your products and services. That’s regular in the world of business. What is not normal is procuring the government to mandate the use of your product while simultaneously thwarting sharing bad reviews that impact auctions or action you to improve the safety or effectiveness of the product.
So, what was happening in the vaccine manufacture before 2020 has continued during the pandemic. The pushing to censor negative press about inoculations on Facebook has been outright shocking. The reason is that “misinformation” thwarts beings from manufacturing voice medical decisions.
It’s the same justification being used by Facebook to name any information about the COVID vaccine4 1 as fallaciou or admonishes beings embed their own plots against “extremist judges, ” while provide “confidential support.”4 2
Government Asking Social Media to Ban Research
Christina Parks, Ph.D ., has her measure in cellular and molecular biology. In this short video she vouches before the Michigan House on Bill 4471, which seeks to prohibit vaccinations as a condition of employment in Michigan. You likely have read or heard the information she shares about COVID, influenza and DTap vaccines if you’ve been reading my newsletter.
Yet, the science she’s quoting is the terribly information that Facebook, and the U.S. authority would like to ban from social media places. To control and influence your demeanor, it is essential that you do not understand the social sciences behind viral pathogens and the vaccines that hope to control those infections — and that intends stopping you from learning technical truths by any means possible.
July 16, 2021, during a White House briefing4 3 press secretary Jen Psaki admitted that the Biden Administration is alerting social media companies to posts and accounts that the White House believes is peddling “misinformation” about COVID insertions. This is illegal and a violation of First Amendment liberties. During the brief she quoth the “Disinformation Dozen” report released by the Center for Countering Digital Hate( CCDH ). 44,45
The report claims that 65% of anti-vaccine content on Facebook and Twitter comes from 12 individuals, including me. After this “disinformation” report was virally spread, the truth was indicates that there is an August 18, 2021, report from Bickert at Facebook, placing the record straight, and in the process razed the CCDH’s claims. The report discovered: 46
“In fact, these 12 parties are responsible for about merely 0.05% of all beliefs of vaccine-related content on Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related berths they’ve shared, whether true-life or fictitiou, as well as URLs associated with these people.”
As the likenes on Reddit4 7 aptly expresses, Facebook now promotes the idea that stretching meat and buying nutrient from farmers may determine you “too prepared.” They will warn your friends they have been exposed to extremist ideas and can receive confidential support to ensure they don’t follow suit.
After the recent warmer weather and time of greater freedom, it could be easy to think the pandemic is behind us. London currently has the lowest COVID-1 9 case rate of any region in England but beings are coming back together for autumn with the return of institutions, universities and workplaces.
While levels of transmission of the coronavirus remains high overall, it’s time for us to be vigilant and ensure we are fully prepared for potentially challenging months ahead. Coronavirus controls in place last year meant that many of the usual winter viruses such as flu , norovirus and RSV were repressed, so we’re preparing for an changeable winter with many more respiratory and seasonal illness circulating.
COVID-1 9 inoculations save lives
Vaccines remain the most powerful and effective tool against severe disease and death from COVID-1 9, and have proven to be effective against many of the brand-new variants of the virus that have emerged over the past year. A key part of preparing for the upcoming winter season is ensuring we continue to increase population coverage and uptake of vaccines, and the most recent proclamations about the booster programme and vaccine offer to 12-15 year olds are welcome.
Although we have made great progress with flattening out the inoculation program in London, “were having” further to go to ensure we have high levels of uptake in all age cohorts, communities and areas of the city. London, like other large metropolitan areas with younger, more diverse, disadvantaged and mobile people, generally has lower uptake of childhood and adult vaccines compared to other regions, and it’s been no different for the COVID-1 9 inoculations. Across the UK over 80% of beings aged 16 and over are fully vaccinated compared to time 60% in London.
Because of the somewhat mingled picture of vaccine uptake across the city, protection from the severe disease and death caused by the virus this winter is likely to be uneven. The data on vaccination is clear; simply 1.2% of deaths involving COVID-1 9 between January and July this year occurred in people who received both dosages of the inoculation. Although occurrence frequencies in London have been stable in recent weeks, the average number of daily illness is ten times higher than this time last year. We are therefore coming into winter from a higher baseline and strengthening our vaccine coverage throughout the city is essential as it will be our strongest cable of defence.
Addressing inoculation hesitancy
We know that the difference in mortality risk between ethnic groups can primarily are attributable to demographic, geographical and socioeconomic factors, often further aggravated by restriction trust and engagement with public health services, poor access to healthcare and lower confidence in the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine due to commonly held superstitions and misinformation. This is why we continue our commitment to working with London’s communities to provide reliable and accessible information about health and vaccines throughout the said period, ensuring that every Londoner can make an informed choice and freely access the vaccine, protecting all our communities and leaving none behind.
We now have the research, suffer and tools to ensure the vaccine is delivered safely to all who need it. From early in the pandemic, we have listened to our communities to understand how and where they like to access information. Taking a united approach with our partners in London to share information regularly has been vital. Over the summer, we worked collectively with young Londoners, the NHS and the Mayor of London’s team at the Greater London Authority to understand the barriers to 20 -2 5 year olds in the capital getting their COVID-1 9 inoculation and how to overcome them.
Young adults shared that they wanted to have open and honest exchanges to help shape their decision, but away from vaccine cores, and in creative spaces with likeminded people. Together we co-designed the “London, You Good? ” project and patronized over 30 regional community organisations in more than 20 districts to host phenomena through music, boast, film, dance and additional activities. This brought together young Londoners from across the city so they could have their questions on the vaccine refuted and an environment to discuss the significant impact of the pandemic on their lives and the effect on their mental health.
Keep on going injected, London
Every day, uptake of the COVID vaccine continues to increase as thousands of Londoners get their jabs at GP rules, vaccination centres, regional society pharmacies and inoculation outreach centres. However, we still have a long way to go if we are to achieve high inoculation coverage in all corners of the city and all eligible age group. It has been an immense effort so far by everyone involved but the rate of uptake has retarded, and frequencies are specially low-spirited among young men from economically disadvantaged parishes, and Black Caribbean and Black African young men from all backgrounds. We need Londoners to continue with the effort- get injected, taking up the booster jab if eligible, and encouraging young people to get vaccinated too.
Stay safe this winter
It is important to remember that the direction of the pandemic are subject to change instantly with emerging winter press and that is why brand-new counseling such as the government’s Winter Plan and the Chief Medical Officers’ recommendation to extend vaccination to all 12 -1 5 year olds, aim to keep pace, so we can keep on top of the pandemic. Rising charges could require a return to more stringent measures including compulsory mask wearing, succeeding from home and vaccine certification. The wander to recovery is going to be a marathon , not a sprint, and regrettably this is not an issue that will disappear overnight.
So, as we are moving forward through autumn and into wintertime, we’re still advising people to stay cautious and to keep up to date with the most recent developments and information. Continue wearing face extends in crowded the regions and on public transport, ventilate indoor neighbourhoods, assessment yourself twice a few weeks with lateral flow maneuvers, and get a PCR test and stay at home “if youre having” symptoms.
If you haven’t more had your vaccine or second dosage, please come forward as soon as possible so London has the best protection and possibility of retaining live leading safely this wintertime. Give yourself and those you adoration the best protection against the most devastating impacts of this infection. The vaccine present remains open for everyone eligible and there’s no such thing as a missed hazard, so if you’ve left it a while it’s not too late! Book your inoculation appointment today or find a walk-in vaccination site.
Angelina Jolie is speaking out with kudo for the brave U.S. gymnasts who spoke at a Senate hearing this week.
Simone Biles, Aly Raisman, McKayla Maroney, Maggie Nichols, Jessica Howard, Kaylee Lorincz, and more testified about the Inspector General’s report on the FBI handling of the Larry Nassar investigation of sexual abuse of Olympic gymnasts.
The hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee took place on Wednesday afternoon( September 15) in Washington, D.C.
Angelina was also in town and she met with the young women.
Click inside to read what she wrote about them on Instagram …
” I was honored to meet with some of the brave US gymnasts who materialized before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday. I’m in awe of their fearlessnes and commitment to preventing future flops to investigate abuse. As Aly Raisman said in her evidence,’ Over 100 preys could have been saved the abuse. All we needed was one adult to do the right thing .’ Sending substantiate and respect to them, and to all who are reliving this pain so that plan reforms can occur ,” Angelina wrote on Instagram.
She lent,” I was on Capitol Hill this week, participating with Senators on the Violence Against Women Act reauthorization and FBI reforms, including better protections for abused children , non-biased forensic manifestation accumulation, trauma attention, and judicial learn .”
In a brand-new interview, the 54 -year-old CNN anchor talked about the possibility of handing 16 -month-old son Wyatt a sibling one day.
Click inside to read more…
“I would[ have more boys ], unquestionably. It is clearly be nice for Wyatt to have a sibling ,” Anderson shared with People.
Anderson likewise gushed about life-time with Wyatt.
“He’s just so happy and giggly, ” Anderson said. “Being there when he wakes up and taking him out of the bed, it’s just very good. I abruptly recall, like,’ Oh my God, there’s going to be a time when he won’t let me kiss his face all over or deem his hands, even .'”
If you didn’t know, Anderson is co-parenting Wyatt with ex suitor Benjamin Maisani.
Also in the interview, Anderson praised Benjamin, 48, for his commitment to parenting.
“We’re exes but we’re family to each other, and we desire each other as family and as co-parents ,” Anderson explained.” There’s the usual bickering that any two people have when there’s a kid involved, like’ What term should he go to swimming class? ’ or’ Should he wear the overalls? ’ or whatever .”
He included, “But all silly, minor things. We is moving forward huge. I’ve always believed that if you’ve been with soul and that ends in terms of an insinuate tie-in, if you affection person there’s no reason why that love shouldn’t continue.”
This article was previously published March 27, 2021, and has been revised with new information.
Geert Vanden Bossche, Ph.D ., a vaccinology insider and former world-wide administrator of inoculation planneds, including work for the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation, has called for the mass vaccination campaign against COVID-1 9 to end. In the video above, he speaks with Discernable about one of his primary concerns with COVID-1 9 inoculations, which is immune escape.
Bossche describes a guiding principles in biology, vaccinology and microbiology that if you put living beasts like bacteria or viruses under pressure, via antibiotics, antibodies or chemotherapeutics, for example, but don’t kill them off wholly, you are eligible to unknowingly encourage their mutation into more venomous strivings. Those that flee your immune arrangement end up surviving and adopting mutations guarantee its further survival.
“It will have a very tough time … and a good deal of these microorganisms will die, ” Bossche says. “But if you cannot really kill them all, if you cannot prevent, altogether, the infection and if there are still some micro-organisms that can replicate despite this huge pressure, they will start to select mutations that enable them to survive.”
COVID-1 9 has a high capacity for mutant but, according to Bossche, if the virus isn’t under pressure, it won’t definitely witness a need to select mutants to, for example, were becoming increasingly infectious. But if you positioned it under pressure, as is occurring during the mass vaccination campaign — or as Bossche sees it, the “one big-hearted experiment” — this may change.
“This in its own right would not be a disaster … because … viruses can only replicate and multiply in living cadres, ” Bossche computes. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that crusades COVID-1 9, is an enveloped cadre, so it cannot survive long in the environmental issues. However, during a pandemic, when the virus is virtually everywhere, it’s not difficult for it to find a living legion in order to replicate.
Some of Bossche’s concerns have deserved, but there’s another side to this story, as noted by Rosemary Frei, who has a master of science in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary and is an independent investigative journalist in Canada. Frei believes that Bossche has a “not-so-hidden agenda, ” which is to push the exploitation and widespread usage of a different type of vaccine.
“[ F] rom my experience as a former long-time medical novelist and journalist — specially a four-month stint with media-relations beings FleishmanHillard in 1994( yes, I’ve worked for the dark side) — this has all the hallmarks of a drug company astroturf campaign, ” Frei says.
“It’s another step in the decades-long erasure of the fact that our intelligent and highly effective immune systems is functioning properly and don’t need any assistance from the biomedical/ pharmaceutical industry.”1
Bossche: ‘It’s Exactly the Same as Antibiotic Resistance’
Bossche asks the dangers of mass COVID-1 9 vaccination and uses antibiotic fight as an example. Antibiotics are increasingly losing their effectiveness against common bacteria, which have figured out how to circumvent the doses. In the case of COVID-1 9, the virus may be developing ways to evade your “self-made antiviral antibiotics, ” or antibodies.
Your body has both cell-mediated immunity, which is part of your innate immune structure, and humoral immunity, which generates acquired antibodies that are elicited in response to specific pathogens. While acquired antibodies, such as those generated by the COVID-1 9 inoculation, are germ-specific, cell-mediated immunity is not and serves to protect you from a broad range of potential attackers. Bossche showed: 2
“As the innate immune plan cannot retain the pathogens it encountered( innate immunity has no so-called ‘immunological memory’ ), we can only continue to rely on it supported we keep it ‘trained’ well enough. Training is achieved by regular exposure to a myriad of environmental agents, including pathogens.
However, as we age, the authorities concerned will increasingly face situations where our innate exemption( often announced ‘the firstly route of immune defense’) is not strong enough to halt the pathogen at the portal of introduction( chiefly mucosal railings like respiratory or intestinal epithelia ).
When this happens, the immune organisation has to rely on more specialized effectors of our immune plan( i.e ., antigen-specific Abs[ antibodies] and T cadres) to fight the pathogen.”
COVID-1 9 vaccines are meant to induce highly specific antibodies that target SARS-CoV-2. However, as in the case of antibiotic opposition, it’s essential that these antibodies are able to eliminate all of the virus. If not, a degenerated sequel could ensue, including the immune escape that Bossche is warning of: 3
“In case of bacterial illnes it is critical to not only choice the claim type of antibiotic( based on the results from an antibiogram) but to also take the antibiotic for long enough( according to the drug ). Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to survive and, hence, may cause the disease to fare up.
A very similar mechanism may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly mutate( which is, for example, the occurrence with coronaviruses ); when the pressure utilized by the army’s( read: population’s) immune protection starts to threaten viral replication and transfer, the virus will take over another hair so that it can no longer be easily recognized and, hence, attacked by the host immune system. The virus is now able to escape immunity( so-called ‘immune escape’ ). “
But Frei disagrees with Bossche’s notion that viral resistance will create an irresistible mutant virus: 4
“There is the possibility of viral defiance … but it’s not the major threat Vanden Bossche attempts to scare us about with people saying the virus is likely to mutate so much and so quickly because of the current mass vaccination safaruss that soon it could escape all current attempts to stop its spread. Remember, for example, that yearly flu mass vaccination hasn’t caused influenza to spiraling out of control and devastate the global population.”
Mass Vaccination ‘Creates an Ebullient Monster’
Bossche believes that scientists, vaccinologists and clinicians are being blinded by the positive short-term effects COVID-1 9 vaccines may have for individuals while ignoring their “disastrous consequences for world health.” In everyday environments, an periodic viral “escape mutant” isn’t exceedingly concerning because it’s unlikely to quickly find access to a emcee which could be used to replicate.
During a pandemic, nonetheless, it’s quite easy for the mutated, variant virus to find new legions, which is able include those with asymptomatic COVID-1 9 or people who have received only the first of a two-dose COVID-1 9 vaccine, leaving them with a suboptimal immune response. According to Bossche: 5
“The combination of viral infection on a background of suboptimal Ab maturity and accumulation enables the virus to select mutations allowing it to escape the immune pressure.
The selection of those mutants preferably occurring in the S protein as this is the viral protein that is responsible for viral infectiousness. As the selection of mutations give the virus with increased infectious capacity, it now becomes a lot easier for the virus to begin severe illnes in infected subjects.”
He trusts people who have had asymptomatic COVID-1 9 illness may suffer a short-lived rise in S( spike) -specific antibodies, which hushes the innate immune response, which could have disastrous effects, including for children: 6
“This is to say that with an increasing rate of infection in specific populations, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary increase in S-specific Abs will steadily increase. Hence, the number of subjects who get infected while knowledge a momentary decrease in their innate exemption will increase.
As a cause, a steadily increasing number of subjects has become still more suggestible to going severe canker instead of showing only mild indications( i.e ., limited to the upper respiratory tract) or no manifestations at all. During a pandemic, specially children will be influenced by this evolution as their natural Abs are not yet principally hushed by a panoply of ‘acquired’, antigen-specific Abs.”
A perfect storm may have been created because lockdowns implemented since the beginning of the pandemic have meant that people have not had regular revelation to various categories of pathogens, which is necessary to keep the innate immune system in top working condition.
Frei again takes edition with Bossche’s assessment, in part because she says he hasn’t added direct manifestation to assist his statements. Further, she indicates, “Vanden Bossche downplays the effectiveness of the antibodies our people naturally cause as part of the second-line( ‘adaptive’) one of the purposes of the immune plan that also has acted us extremely well for millennia.”7
Will Mass Vaccination of Elderly Increase Death in the Young?
In March 2021 Bossche stated that mass vaccination of the elderly against COVID-1 9 will dramatically increase morbidity and mortality rates in younger populations because, as the elderly become protected, the virus will seek out younger people to survive.
His projections started coming true-life the end of April8 and, by August 2021, front line doctors were reporting that unvaccinated parties in their 20 s and 30 s were becoming severely ill with COVID, 9 while 90% of persons age 65 or older were vaccinated. 10
Bossche’s reasoning was that if the virus escaped the S-specific antibodies the hell is temporarily further increase asymptomatically infected parties, it could take advantage of the muffled innate exemption, countenancing the virus to multiply rapidly.
“Selecting targeted mutations in the S protein is, therefore, the way to go in order for the virus to enhance its infectiousness in candidates that are prone to going the disease because of a transient weakness of their innate immune defense, ” Bossche said. 11
Bossche also alleged that another trouble was that variants of SARS-CoV-2 were reportedly circulating, 12 which don’t match well with the inoculation. 13 He said people who have been vaccinated are potentially becoming asymptomatic carriers and are removing the more infectious variances in local communities: 14
“We’re too facing a huge problem in vaccinated beings as they’re now more and more confronted with virulent variants exposing a type of S protein that is increasingly different from the S volume comprised with the inoculation( the latter publication is coming from the original, much less infectious strain at the beginning of the pandemic ).
The more variants become infectious( i.e ., as a result of blocking access of the virus to the inoculated segment of specific populations ), the less vaccinal Abs will protect.
Already now, need of armour will contribute to viral throw and dissemination in inoculation recipients who are exposed to these more infectious strivings( which, by the way, increasingly dominate the field ). This is how we are currently turning vaccinees into asymptomatic carriers removing infectious variants.”
There was controversy over the infectious variants that Bossche mentioned, however. Frei points out that, “Vanden Bossche too asserts that there’s an ‘ever[ -] increasing threat from rapidly spreading, highly infectious discrepancies, ‘ but as I detailed in my February 3, 2021, article1 5 and accompanying video on the new variants, there is no proof that they are highly infectious or will be any time soon.”1 6
Of course, we now know that Bossche was correct about the discrepancies, more: The Delta variant is raging, the COVID vaccines are waning and provoking calls for booster shots as amply injected people not only be brought to an end in hospitals, but learn there is an opportunity transmit the virus asymptomatically. And, as Bossche prophesied, other variances seem positioned to take hold if the Delta variant dies out.
Perfect Whirlwind for COVID to Resist the Human Immune System
Bossche believes it will simply take a few more targeted mutations for the virus to fully resist S-specific anti-COVID-1 9 antibodies, whether they’re produced from vaccination or natural illnes. The reaction could be that this population becomes especially vulnerable due to their no longer handy S-specific antibodies in combination with a repressed innate immune response. Harmonizing to Bossche: 17
” …[ W] e’ll have whipped up the virus in the younger population up to a grade that it now takes little exertion for Covid-1 9 to transform into a highly infectious virus that fully ignores both the innate appendage of our immune structure as well as the adaptive/ acquired one( regardless of whether the acquired Abs resulted from vaccination or natural infection ).
The effort for the virus is now becoming even more imperceptible given that countless inoculation recipients are now exposed to highly infectious viral variances while having received only a single shot of the vaccine. Hence, they are gave with Abs that had still not been acquired optimal functionality.
There is no need to explain that this is just going to further enhance immune escape. Basically, we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that perfectly withstands our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system.”
In essence, Bossche states that the widespread COVID-1 9 vaccination expedition will efficiently turn what was a relatively innocuous virus into a “bioweapon of mass destruction, ” and that the combination of stringent infection prevention measures combined with the inadequate COVID-1 9 inoculations being wheeled out will permit the pandemic to get worse instead of better.
Ironically, Bossche recommends that the solution to ending the COVID-1 9 pandemic, other than letting the virus run its natural trend, is to create natural murderer( NK) cell-based vaccines. He maintains that widespread consume of NK cell located inoculations may assist the innate immune system to eliminate coronaviruses at an early stage of infection. But, according to Frei, this is a red flag in Bossche’s open character. She territory: 18
“It’s not particularly logical to believe that the only solution to the theoretical possible of immune escape, as espoused by someone who’s got a long and strong focus on vaccination as opposed to other ways to improve health, is yet more mass vaccination.
… I do agree that we should stop the use of the current vaccines. But we also we need to stop production and use of antivirals and antibodies and all other parts of the Covid-industrial complex. Covid has an extremely high survival rate. So why develop yet another expensive, invasive and experimental solution to a problem that barely exists, if it does at all? “
Bossche does recommend exercise, healthful menu, residue and a good mental attitude, along with staying away from harmful forces, to bolster the health of your immune plan. But in the meantime, he says, “there is not one second left for paraphernaliums to be swopped and to change the current killer inoculations … “1 9
He’s reached out to the World Health Organization and other international state organizations to warn of the potentially prejudicial consequences thereof further viral immune escape triggered by the current COVID-1 9 vaccination expedition, calling it the “single most important public health emergency of international concern, ” but so far all have remained silent.
Frei, meanwhile, is trying to spread the word that she belief Bossche’s letter was simply “a continuation of the overall COVID deception”: 20
“When combined with the contents of his open letter, it’s inconceivable to believe that he’s in fact an insider who’s now turned against his very high-powered comrades[ including the drug industry and vaccine proponents] … It’s more likely that he’s their accomplice.”
Like in previous year’s reports, this update looks at a range of population health data, such as smoking and obesity, but it also provides an early epitome of the impact of the COVID-1 9 pandemic on many aspects of health and health inequalities.
Here we look at five important points the report makes about how the nation’s health has been affected either directly or indirectly by the pandemic.
Mortality are greater than previous years
In 2020, COVID-1 9 was “the worlds leading” underlying cause of death among males, changing congestive heart failure, and the second largest cause of death among girls after dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. By the end of June 2021, 132,053 demises had been registered with COVID-1 9 mentioned on the death certificate among England residents.
Between 21 March 2020 and 2 July 2021, demises were 1.14 times higher than expected across England, based on data for the previous five years.
Deaths were higher than expected in all age groups over 25 but were particularly high in people living in deprived orbits( 1.17 times greater) and in the Black and Asian population( 1.50 times greater ), indicating the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on these groups. This can be found in figures 1 and 2 below.
Figure 1: Cumulative excess mortality ratio, by distres, England, week culminating 27 March 2020 to week aiming 2 July 2021
Dementia and Alzheimer’s disease remained the leading cause of death in England in females and the third largest in males. Deaths from dementia continued to increase in 2020 and dementia was reported as the primary pre-existing health state in 26% of all deaths involving COVID-1 9 between March and June 2020.
By June 2021, there were around 35,000 fewer people aged 65 and over with a diagnosis of dementia. Although increased mortality among parties with dementia during the course of its pandemic may be a factor, this is also likely due to reduced access to services where diagnosis makes place.
Very few GP referrals were made to Memory Assessment Assistance in the first lockdown and by September 2020 referrals were down by 25% of those expected. It is estimated that there were 10,000 missed referrals up to March 2021.
Health services were not used as much
During the pandemic, hospital admissions, A& E appearances and the number of GP consultations are still down, particularly in the first waving of the pandemic.
Surveys show that half of people with a worsening state milieu between May 2020 and January 2021 did not seek treatment, most commonly because they did not want to put pressure on the NHS or were concerned about catching COVID-1 9.
This has meant that new identifications for some diseases this year were much down compared with previous years. This includes cancer, for which there is indeed 16% less identifications between April and December 2020 than in the corresponding period in 2019, as seen in Figure 3 below.
Figure 3: Monthly new cancer diagnosis, working days adjusted, England, January 2018 to April 2021
This reduced contact with health services may mean that preventative medication has been missed but could also lead to long-term health complications and an increase in deaths in the future, meaning that we can still expect to see the impact of COVID-1 9 in years to come.
Children’s improvement may have suffered
Children’s education has been severely stopped during the pandemic. From 23 March 2020 until June 2020, most institutions in England were closed to children other than those with parents who were keyworkers or “whos” classed as vulnerable.
Whilst the full wallop of the pandemic on child health and development is still not known and will not be known for some time, initial studies suggest that children who started school in the Autumn 2020 term needed additional subscribe when compared with children in previous school year and that learn has suffered to some degree for most pupils and year groups, especially primary and most underprivileged students.
Almost all schools have indicated that they are concerned about young pupils’ communication and language development, personal, social and feelings occurrence and levels of literacy as children were not experiencing the social interactions that they are generally would, such as play dates and interacting with grandparents.
In 2020, one in six children aged five to 16 times were identified as having a probable mental disturbance, increasing from one in nine in 2017. Children and young adults with a probable mental disturbance were more likely to say that lockdown had offset “peoples lives” worse.
Increased alcohol intake among heavy drinkers likely drove an increase in alcoholic liver demises
There has been an unprecedented increase in alcohol-specific demises( fatalities which were caused by alcohol use ), mainly due to increased alcoholic liver cancer death. In 2020, alcohol-specific deaths increased by 20% comparison with 2019. Although alcohol-specific mortality rates have been increasing in recent years, this represented a significant acceleration in the upward trend.
A recent PHE report monitoring booze uptake and distress during the course of its pandemic noted that the increase in alcoholic liver malady mortality was’ likely to be due to increased uptake among an previously at-risk group of heavy drinkers’.
Increased mortality has impacted on life expectancy…
The high number of deaths due to COVID-1 9 generated life expectancy in England to fall in 2020, by 1.3 years for males to 78.7 years and 0.9 years for girls to 82.7 years. This is the lowest life expectancy since 2011 for males and females.
The pandemic has exacerbated existing inequalities in life expectancy by deprivation to the largest we have seen in two decades, which is as far back as our data proceeds. The divergence between “the worlds largest” and least expropriated areas in England in 2020 was1 0.3 times for males, one year larger than in 2019, and 8.3 times for females, 0.6 years larger than in 2019, as Figure 4 shows.
Figure 4: Life expectancy, by gender and deprivation decile, England 2019 and 2020
COVID-1 9 was the cause of death that contributed most to this gap, nonetheless, higher death from congestive heart failure, lung cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases in deprived provinces remained important contributors. You can read more about how life expectancy changed in 2020 here.
We will continue to monitor the impacts of the pandemic on the nation’s health as a priority as additional health data becomes available.